DarkC
-KMC THREAD KILLER-
Originally posted by Blax_Hydralisk
But it makes my argument so much easier... 🙁And I think that rule was created back in the day when a lot of people were questioning how the Halo novels fit into continuity.
We weren't as enlightened, way back when.
I think that, if people have a problem with it, they should take it up with Lana, specifically in the rules thread. If enough people talk about it she might change the rule.
I know it does Blax, lol.
Halo is probably the best example of why this rule should NOT be in place. Most of the abilities and feats performed by the Master Chief are in the novels, fully endorsed by Bungie. It severely cripples anyone trying to bring things he did in the books such as surviving an antitank missile and running 500m in 12s with a torn Achilles tendon.
If you ask me Street Fighter is the best example of why this rule should be in place. A lot of the "plot devices", while endorsed by Capcom, are officially non-canon (Udon comics, the anime, the movie). The thing is, most people who get into a debate involving a Street Fighter character know this anyway so it would be easily refuted. However, some of the references (while not IN the games) are perfectly viable too as canon materia, such as interview transcripts and the well-known Tiamat Street Fighter Plot Guide.
It severely hampers debaters who are trying to use an "official" feat, yet the rule limits them because it's not from in-game. It shouldn't be up to anyone but the companies themselves to decide official material that can be used as materia in discussion. It's a useless rule, what's the point debating for a character if I can't even use all his officially stated capabilities and feats as argument?
And if you think about it, it doesn't even defeat the purpose of this forum either, simply because a character originated from a video game doesn't mean that the arguments have to come from strictly the games themselves. Someone mentioned FF7:AC and that's a great example; Square Enix stated it as canon yet technically we aren't allowed to use it because - oops, it's a movie! Despite that, you see it being brought up left and right, both Sado and I made numerous references to it in the Gouki vs. Cloud thread anyways.
Completely boggles my mind as to why on Earth this rule was tacked up in the first place.