Cyclops runs a gauntlet

Started by The Heap7 pages

He stops at Joker.

Originally posted by SuperiorTech
Your right actually reading the comics about the people your debating for or against is pretty overrated.
😂

Originally posted by Lord S
Ok what was that thing we talked about the other day? Common knowledge? Yeah.

It's not like I've never read comics with Batman in them, I just don't follow the character that closely. Just like I don't read X-Men comics anymore, but still consider myself quite knowledgable on the subject. Due to his popularity, and the vast amount of information about him available all over the web, even a casual reader can get a good handle on what his abilities are. You don't need to have infinite knowledge on the character to know that he's an excellent h2h combatant., has a wide array of gadgets and weaponry in his belt, plus a brain. Common knowledge.

Regarding Cyclops, I don't doubt he can fry anyone he nails with his optic blasts at point-blank range, but what else has he got? Maybe you're under the assumption that Batman will just stand in front of him and do nothing...if that's the case, then Cyclops surely wins, but that would be a ludicrous assumption. How good is Cyclops h2h? He's too one-dimensional, IMO. People talk about him as if he's Captain America, when in fact he's far from it.

So that's my opinion...if your nickers are still in a knot over it, then that's your problem.

Yes, because the only scenario in which Cyclops will be able to hit Batman is if he stands still.

I mean, Cyclops never hits moving objects.

Originally posted by Mindset
Yes, because the only scenario in which Cyclops will be able to hit Batman is if he stands still.

I mean, Cyclops never hits moving objects.

So then by your logic Cyclops should never lose against anybody that moves.

Well, no way in HELL is Cyclops beating Clayface. His lasers won't help him much here.

Originally posted by Lord S
So then by your logic Cyclops should never lose against anybody that moves.
Is this post serious?

Originally posted by Mindset
Is this post serious?
That depends if you believe your own, ahem, logic.

Originally posted by Lord S
That depends if you believe your own, ahem, logic.
Are you mentally retarded?

Originally posted by Mindset
Are you mentally retarded?
Wow...just wow!

Who ever said true wit was dead...Oscar Wilde ain't got nothing on you!

Originally posted by Lord S
So then by your logic Cyclops should never lose against anybody that moves.

Even if we are to discount the Speed of his blast, The Accuracy of Cyke using them and just take into account the actual radius the he can cover with a blast batman would be hard pressed not to get tagged.

http://img224.imagevenue.com/img.php?image=60977_X-Men_Hidden_Years_n1-p29_122_343lo.JPG
------------------------------------------------------------
http://img46.imagevenue.com/img.php?image=65155_HY22PG06_122_619lo.JPG
http://img176.imagevenue.com/img.php?image=65156_HY22PG07_122_484lo.JPG
------------------------------------------------------------
http://img219.imagevenue.com/img.php?image=65146_Secret_Wars_005-21_122_64lo.jpg
------------------------------------------------------------
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v655/pr1983/scotthulkPIS2.jpg

Originally posted by Lord S
Wow...just wow!

Who ever said true wit was dead...Oscar Wilde ain't got nothing on you!

So I guess you are.

When did I ever say or even elude to the fact Cyclops would never lose to someone that moves? Oh yea, never.

Either you are trolling or you're retarded.

Originally posted by Mindset
So I guess you are.

When did I ever say or even elude to the fact Cyclops would never lose to someone that moves? Oh yea, never.

Either you are trolling or you're retarded.

😆 You crack me up but seriously 😐.

Originally posted by Mindset
So I guess you are.

When did I ever say or even elude to the fact Cyclops would never lose to someone that moves? Oh yea, never.

Either you are trolling or you're retarded.

rolleyes1

I think you mean 'allude'. See...I can be an *******, too.

I don't know what you're all mad about, but next time try debating without the sarcasm and general snarkiness. Maybe it's residual hostility carried over from that Onslaught/Thanos thread, but you've been riding me since about halfway through this thread to the point of name-calling.

You've been reported, so why not just drop it now?

Originally posted by Lord S
rolleyes1

I think you mean 'allude'. See...I can be an *******, too.

I don't know what you're all mad about, but next time try debating without the sarcasm and general snarkiness. Maybe it's residual hostility carried over from that Onslaught/Thanos thread, but you've been riding me since about halfway through this thread to the point of name-calling.

You've been reported, so why not just drop it now?

Asking questions is riding you?

I was sarcastic in one post in this entire thread...

The point of name calling? The only time I said anything rude to you was when you tried to make up something I said, I suggest you look back through this thread because it seems like you are seeing things that weren't actually there.

Guys, shut up please and get back on topic. gun4durgun3

Clayface stops Cyclops in his tracks.

Lol at the scans where Hulk pwn Cyclops 😛

Re: Re: Cyclops runs a gauntlet

Originally posted by vansonbee
1. Riddler = 9/10 Cyclops

2. Captain America = 8/10 Captain America win: Shield, Strength, speed, H2H combat expert

3. Joker = 8/10 Cyclops

4. Batman = 7/10 Cyclops

5. Spider-Man = 8/10 win for Spiderman: Spider Sense, Speed, Strength

6. Clayface = Tie I say. Clayface getting blast to bits and it take him too long to regenarate to continue the battle, or Clay take hold and swallow Cyclop and squeeze him to death.

Qft

Re: Re: Re: Cyclops runs a gauntlet

Originally posted by Bouboumaster
Qft

What does those initials stand for?

agreeing with my ratio 😛?

Huge lulz at 'lord s.'

Don't sweat it, mindset. Some people just don't have the appropriate faculties.