Originally posted by Victor Von Doom
**** this queerfest.
Amen, if men were meant to be with other men, we'd be able to reproduce. All homosexuality is pretty much wrong, no matter how you look at it. I, like most men, have watched lesbian porn, but even being lesbian is pretty wrong, as entertaining as it was for me to watch. Men are only meant to be with women.
WORD
Originally posted by Markus Corvinus
Amen, if men were meant to be with other men, we'd be able to reproduce. All homosexuality is pretty much wrong, no matter how you look at it. I, like most men, have watched lesbian porn, but even being lesbian is pretty wrong, as entertaining as it was for me to watch. Men are only meant to be with women.WORD
Ha, dumbass.
Originally posted by Markus Corvinus
Amen, if men were meant to be with other men, we'd be able to reproduce. All homosexuality is pretty much wrong, no matter how you look at it. I, like most men, have watched lesbian porn, but even being lesbian is pretty wrong, as entertaining as it was for me to watch. Men are only meant to be with women.WORD
Then please be the first to only and I mean ONLY have sex with a woman when she's ovulating and you have every intention of impregnating her. In fact, have your sperm-count tested; if you happen to be sterile or have a critically low sperm count, do the right (as opposed to wrong) thing and live a life of celibacy.
AIGHT.
Originally posted by dadudemon
I mostly agree with you. However, God made gays. That means homosexuality is natural.I can tolerate the civil unions thing. But why call it something else when it's the same thing? Sentimental reasons? Just call it marriage, I say.
God create humans. Humans create homosexuality. And anything man-made is unnatural. Synthetic.
And marriages and civil unions are the same thing like basketball and football are the same thing. Both require points to win, both are competitive and even have teams with their own proper uniforms. But you can't have 'em on the same ground. Football's football and basketballs' basketball. That's just the way it's is and has been traditionally. When a man and a woman take the plunge together specifically, religiously, traditionally, etc., we've called it a marriage because the joining is between a man and a woman in holy matrimony.
That's how marriages and civil unions are and should be different. Not that civil unions are low, it's just the marriage ritual always said that choosing to marry means it going to occur with a man and woman. And nothing else. Any and everything and anyone else can and should feel free to create their own version of a sacred ritual with their own ways and rules that involves coming together to create any sort of formal bond, just like marriage did thousands of years ago.
What people do tend to forget is that calling homosexuality unnatural isn't actually derogatory if you mean it by definition, or a definition.
If one subscribes to the idea that the purpose and/or function of humans is to reproduce, then obviously being attracted to the same sex isn't meant to happen and would probably then be considered unnatural.
I personally don't really care, because it has shit all to do with marriage, which should be a legal institution anyway, but if it has to exist then let anyone do it.
-AC
Originally posted by inimalistNothing, but why would they want to?
whats wrong with people getting married just because they want to?
Originally posted by Bardock42What, how is that my point, or how is social acceptance a stupid reason, or how is the reason eradicated?
How so?
Originally posted by chithappensIt's stupid for wanting to get married.
Where were you when Jim Crow was discussed in class?