Originally posted by Darth_Glentract
No Sith left? What about the entire Brotherhood of Darkness?
By the end? Hoth and Farfalla were commanders. The only battle I know Farfalla took active command in was the last battle of Ruusan. Hoth was seen leading from the camp during the last three battles. The first, he wasn't present in, the second he arrived and cleared off a small force of Sith there...3rd's the one he saw active combat in.
This is were the pivotal disagreement is. I have never agreed with the idea that Sidious was the most powerful Sith who had lived up to that point. He most certainly BECAME the most powerful, but as of ROTS he was far from the top. Bane has shown power far beyond was Mace or Sidious has demonstrated.
And? In the Dark Side Sourcebook, Palpatine is directly named the most powerful Sith of Bane's order. In the New Essential Chronology, the Vader Ultimate Guide, Palpatine's named the most powerful Sith ever. His power exceeds Bane there and considering he had Bane's holocron and time to master all of Bane's knowledge?
And in saber abilities, Mace and Palpatine have demonstrated more than Bane
Mace lacked real lightsaber against lightsaber experience. Hoth and Farfalla have that benefit. The peacekeepers were NEVER described as the best Jedi in combat.
prime of the Jedi in regards to combat. The 'peacekeepers' have that from GEORGE LUCAS'S MOUTH. What does that tell you?
Since combat was never the Jedi's primary role, the 'prime' of the Jedi wouldn't automatically be the best combatants ever.
Ok. So why was he talking combat? The Prime of the Jedi's duelists included Yoda, Mace, Obi-wan, Qui-Gon, Depa, Anakin, Agen, Kit, Shaak Ti, Sora Bulq...I'm probably leaving some out. Mace has trained with a sparred with a great deal of them. And in sabers, Mace outmatched the monster that was Grievous. Mace has overcome any weakness his 'peacekeeping' era has by what he's shown up. Sora Bulq, General Grievous, Asajj Ventress, Palpatine? Mace's faced them all. And he's shown what he's good for with a saber.
So take a solider who has trained in combat for years and then take another who has actual combat experience on multiple occasions. Throw the two into a fight with each other and the one with more experience in that field will usually win. The experience of having actual combat is a major advantage.
Tiny problem? When that order of 'warriors' includes Johun Othone, the argument is badly diminished. Mace and his ilk have far greater showings and backing in the text than any of those warriors.
Farfalla, again, did little but job to Bane. While on BM. Mace, by contrast, has been seen to handle Grievous, fight Palpatine, decimate droid armies, take on Kar Vastor and do lots of crazy things.
Stop clinging to the idea that the Jedi being involved in war is in any way, shape or form enough evidence for them to be able to stand to Depa and Mace. And seriously, JOHUN has more experience than Mace or Depa if you want to play that game.
Fact is, who've demonstrated greater power? Mace and Depa. Who've shown superior blade skills? Depa and Mace. Who have the textual backings? Depa and Mace? Hoth, by the by, lacked the speed to kill Kaan from a short distance away before Kaan raised his hands, yelled "Well gone" and clapped them to unleash the Thought Bomb.
Yes, we can probably definitively say Mace and Depa can take him and Farfalla.
We can put them way up there because they were the best of a group of Jedi who actually lived in a time when fighting Sith was common.
And again...so? Mace was a warrior through and through who fought numerous battles from his youth on and battled personally against one of the most monstrous Jedi killers in history and personally duelist the most powerful Sith who ever lived.
Is there anything Hoth and Farfalla have behind them besides a brief assertion of their era's prowess, which isn't near enough when you consider everything Depa and Mace have, and their status as warleaders? Anything at all?