Overrated?

Started by Victor Von Doom8 pages

My point is that if overrated means a band that some people like more than you do, then the answer is every band.

I imagine his is different.

That's someone overrating a band in his opinion, on a one-by-one basis, subjectively, because he dislikes them.

This is nothing to do with disliking a band.

This thread is quite clearly about the kind of overrating you, and I and others besides him all seem to understand.

The Beatles, U2 etc.

-AC

Ah alright, well, I think Blax problem is that he just took the popularity of the band at his school and figured it would be like that everywhere across the board. Personally I think that evaluating whether something is overrated is not only subjective, but also involves an amount of guesswork as to how they are rated in the first place...of course some methods to find that are better than others.

That wasn't my point at all... I'm only talking about on a local level. I don't mean "Disturbed is overrated in general because in my area it's overrated". 😬

Originally posted by Final Blaxican
That wasn't my point at all... I'm only talking about on a local level. I don't mean "Disturbed is overrated in general because in my area it's overrated". 😬
Oh well, even better then. Makes sense. Though, you stating "Disturbed" initially, without explanation, is a bit confusing...an the thread is probably about a more general level.

Then how is his point even relevant? We're not talking local.

-AC

Originally posted by Alpha Centauri
Then how is his point even relevant? We're not talking local.

-AC

I would say talking about what is locally overrated, is certainly a tangential topic, I wouldn't say it's totally irrelevant,

Originally posted by The Grey Fox
AC/DC are very overrated. Especially Back In Black.

the Back in Black part yes
but thats cause its only one of 5 or 6 songs people play on the radio or in commercials.
the rest is awesome

Originally posted by Alpha Centauri
There're two major kinds of influence. Those who influence people and those who influence music. The Beatles influenced people, not music. The Beatles didn't change music in any way, really. Frank Zappa changed more than they did, he even gave them the idea for their most acclaimed album, Sgt. Peppers
...that's not true. Sgt. Pepper's Lonely Hearts Club Band was Paul McCartney's idea.

Originally posted by Strangelove
...that's not true. Sgt. Pepper's Lonely Hearts Club Band was Paul McCartney's idea.

The idea for a concept album came from Frank Zappa, and he was a heavy influence on the creation of that album.

http://www.icons.org.uk/theicons/collection/sgt-pepper/biography/its-influence

"Although the Beatles distanced themselves from the claim, many rock historians have dubbed Sgt Pepper the first in a long line of concept albums – when all the songs on an LP are linked by a theme. In the case of this release, the main device used was the running of songs together one after the other.

In fact, the Mothers of Invention's Freak Out pre-dated Sergeant Pepper and is considered by others to be the first concept album – a sneering farce about rock music and America as a whole. Paul McCartney has said it influenced Sgt Pepper considerably.".

Well now, whaddya know.

-AC

Originally posted by Alpha Centauri
The idea for a concept album came from Frank Zappa, and he was a heavy influence on the creation of that album.

http://www.icons.org.uk/theicons/collection/sgt-pepper/biography/its-influence

"Although the Beatles distanced themselves from the claim, many rock historians have dubbed Sgt Pepper the first in a long line of concept albums – when all the songs on an LP are linked by a theme. In the case of this release, the main device used was the running of songs together one after the other.

In fact, the Mothers of Invention's Freak Out pre-dated Sergeant Pepper and is considered by others to be the first concept album – a sneering farce about rock music and America as a whole. Paul McCartney has said it influenced Sgt Pepper considerably.".

Well now, whaddya know.

-AC

Oh, I thought you were saying they got the idea for the concept of Sgt. Pepper from Zappa, not the idea of a concept album in general. My bad.

Because the actual idea of the "Lonely Hearts Club Band" was McCartney. ermm

He came up with a concept for a concept album.

He's clearly the genius everyone says.

-AC

Truly.

I agree.. I love the Beatles but they are overrated

Re: Overrated?

Originally posted by geshien
List some bands you think are overrated, which btw doesn't necessarily mean you dislike them.

And while there are bound to be opinions that make you go "What?!", lets keep it friendly.

Most of my favorite 80s bands are consider overrated by other people....such as U2 and REM.

For me bands like Tool, System of a Down, Red Hot Chili Peppers, and AC DC are overrated.

Overrated for me doesn't mean that they're bad. It's just that their fans consider them so friggin great and above that really makes it laughable. I personally don't dislike bands....their fanatics...yes, but not the bands.

Originally posted by moodringer10
I agree.. I love the Beatles but they are overrated
I find it hard to agree. As easy as it would be for me to say "Yes, The Beatles are overrated", I don't believe it.

Originally posted by Strangelove
I find it hard to agree. As easy as it would be for me to say "Yes, The Beatles are overrated", I don't believe it.
Why?

Just a note, I agree that The Beatles are overrated, but anyone who says they "didn't actually change music" should probably take a listen to 'Revolution' and 'Helter Skelter', debatably two of the first 'hard rock'-like songs... ever. I mean, I know that bands like the Mothers of Invention and the Velvet Underground probably had a larger play in the evolution of Hard Rock overall, but you can't just say they didn't change music by judging their most cliched music.

Also have to take into account their influence and evolution of Psychedelic music. I'd say they really did change music, in a lot of ways.

Still overrated, though.

They "changed" music the same way Nirvana did.

They took something different that was happening and made it popular. There were lots of other bands in that movement that did it better.

-AC

The idea of the other bands doing it 'better' is opinion, though. It is however, an opinion I agree with, so I won't say anything about that. I do, though, disagree that Proto-Metal was 'happening' as such in 1968, it was still being experimented with by a few bands, but wasn't catching much attention since not many bands wanted to rely on this new sound they'd discovered.

Hendrix, Cream, Free, etc. were advancing the sound of 'Hard Rock', but they didn't experiment with Proto-metal the way the Beatles did with the said two songs. 'Helter Skelter' was dubbed the heaviest and dirtiest sounding track of it's time, and it was still a year or so before bands like Black Sabbath started picking this sound up and making something more of it.

In that seemingly small way, I believe The Beatles did change and advance music beyond the way you stated. You may disagree, but that is what I believe from what I know.

Also, although unrelated, great sig. Killing Joke don't usually recieve the attention they deserve.