Originally posted by Darth Exodus
So you concede the point? No arguments? Good.
No, I let the quote speak for itself and you whine how it means something different.
Yes. Not only did she get in front of Farfalla after Bane had unleashed a storm of lightning his way but when there 'her arms and blades became a blur as they carved figure eights in the air to catch and absorb the bolts of dark energy', meaning that that her arms would have to be moving at least as fast as lightning to be able to catch Banes lightning which has been described as having 'a dozen forks' as of POD.
So...Hetton moves faster than lightning as well given he dodges a 'storm' of lightning from Bane earlier in the book? Force lightning, in case you haven't noticed is a biiiit slower than normal lightning.
Ok, we've established Raskta's speed is on par with an old man with almost no Dark Side training. Anything else, kiddo?
As to the first point, the only way that it would be invalid would be of Raskta was already in front of Farfalla or pretty close, which isn't the case as she had just been blown far away by Banes Force wave. Not to mention that Banes FL attack comes directly after she regains her feet 'at the speed of thought', so its conclusive that she would have had to move quite far [b]very fast to get in the way of Bane's attack.
Again. This shows Raskta is fast. And she's not blown a massive distance away, given she's cushioned by the force there and is more easily able to regain herself as opposed to when Bane elbows her
And given that that is twenty years after the feat that we're talking about. And that that still isn't a match for Raskta's feat. Even Kopecz match's this feat. Not that it isn't an uber feat though.
An entire ship's crew is a bit greater than a small squad of republic troops. Or did you miss this? I'd be shocked if you didn't.
I agree with Chilled Monkey, you need to provide this example.
Do I need to keep saying 'Shatterpoint' until your tiny brain grasps it?
Being able to block with 90% of your body. I'd be surprised.
Yeah, and it took Raskta, what, moments to adjust and move out of the way? And in an era when freaking cortosis armor is widespread, I sincerely doubt a Jedi of Yoda's caliber is going to encounter many issues
The weakness of his Form won't give him a 100% fail ratio. Remember I did say Yoda would win 3, probably 4 times out of 10 (or at least I'm saying it now). The forms will be a contributing factor in this.
In other words, you consistently ignore logic in your tiny little fanboy brain. Sure, Bane has a weakness in form. And force power. and skill. And speed. But OMG ORBALISKS!
What else are 'contributing' factors? Naturally, you continuously ignore EVERYTHING hurting your case.
Yoda is just better than Bane. He beats him far more often than Bane can beat him and frankly, you can't provide a single counter argument.
Irrelevant. This is nothing that won't be immediately obvious after the first 1 or 2 blows.
I'm gonna say this again because you're clearly unable to understand it the first time:
Dooku was Yoda's student. They've sparred together numerous times. This makes something of a difference. IE: when you know how your opponents fight
ROFL.Now who's twisting canon. Yoda in no way was able to 'utterly leave Dooku in the dust'. Yoda won the fight but it was by no way a mega-stomp or a speedblitz. And distracted? If I recall correctly Yoda was absolutely set on killing Dooku at last. If Yoda is soooooo much greater than Dooku then why couldn't he take down the ba$tard on Geonosis?
Now, either you've a bad memory or you're lying out your ass:
Yoda was kind of distracted by:
A. the massive darkside presence on Vjun
B. saving the innocent woman Dooku had FLUNG OUT THE WINDOW with the Force when Dooku assaults him.
C. Kill Dooku at last? Yoda was trying to TURN HIM BACK TO THE LIGHTSIDE and get through to him while fighting him and holding himself back. Why couldn't Yoda take Dooku down on Geonosis? Gee, let's think, maybe it's because Dooku distracted him by trying to kill Obi-wan and Anakin and Yoda was trying to take him alive?
So no, you don't recall correctly. And Dooku lost the fight on Vjun utterly. Y'know, Dooku? Able to, with incredible ease, handle Grievous at his best-y'know, the guy able to strike sixteen times a second, and defeat Tholme and Sora Bulq simultaneously.
It's already been proved that Bane would have been able to replicate this feat if not for Battle Meditation.
I'm sorry, when were Farfalla or Johun Othone two of the best duelists the Jedi order ever produced? Compared to Agen Kolar or Kit Fisto, AKA the guy capable of moving so fast that Obi-wan could barely follow him? And all this before Mace Windu can react? Mace Windu, who's able to quickly react to block Palpatine's lightning at point blank? Mace, able to utterly overwhelm General Grievous in a fight? Mace, fast enough to stab someone through the heart, deactivate his saber and begin to walk away before the dead man even realizes he's been stabbed (Star Wars: Tales), punch Kar Vastor, what, six times before he could complete a blink?
OK. Just name what must be done and I'll try my best. As long as it doesn't involve conceding the argument or somesuch.
How about, for a starter: Know what you're talking about, stop sticking your fingers in your ears whenever someone brings up a valid argument and stop taking after Nebaris. Also, realize when you're wrong.
Bane is unbelievably skillful, memorising thousands if not millions of attacks and sequences in a short time as well as, by Kas'im's admission 'moving far beyond sequences and forms' as well as out duel two of the greatest swordsmen in the galaxy, one of them while fighting two others at once. Yoda's good but I wouldn't be able to call his skill anything special, nor has it been heralded as such.
Oh, give me a break, 'millions?' Show proof. Yoda's 'good' but his skill's not anything special? Yeah, this is something you work on, because now you're moving to the realms of absurd.' In Dark Rendevzous it says the only Jedi who 'might' withstand Yoda on even ground is Mace Windu. Yoda's skills with a saber are consistently described as 'extraordinary,' and 'incredible' and 'without peer.' He's one of two Jedi able to even compete with Palpatine, someone described as an absolute master of every form and style of the saber, Yoda's able to easily elude Plo Koon, Saesee Tiin and Depa Billaba at once and frankly, Depa Billaba is likely easily comparable to Raskta, given her standing with Mace Windu. Is Yoda called in the ROTS novel's narration as the most devastatingly powerful foe the darkness has ever known because his skill's 'nothing special' or because he's an incredible duelist and a Jedi of, to quote the new encyclopedia as 'extraordinary power'
So yeah, this is why I have a hard time, Exodus. Because you just duplicate Nebaris's hate on for the PT and hard on for the ancients without regard for logic or reason or anything resembling an open mind.
And Farfalla was one of the greatest swordsmen in the galaxy? This begs to be demonstrated.
When was this by the way? Could you elaborate please, because otherwise I don't know if this is a speed feat, force powa etc.
According to the NEC, when a group of clone troopers were left alone and abandoned, Yoda went to the planet by himself and with only his saber, turned the entire droid army into scrap metal, including the giant hailfires into scrap metal in a very short amount of time.
Drat. When was it then?
Before ROTS. Presumably during the Clone Wars