Originally posted by Final Blaxican
I agree.The counter argument is that the same technology that focuses the laser energy into the shape of a blade also retains the heat.
That's sensible in regards to why the Jedi can hold them without bursting into flames, but 'hotter than the sun multiple times over' doesn't make sense because of heat transfer, they would do far more heat damage to droids, blast-doors and people when slicing through.
Thank you though for not just saying "THE FORCE."
Lightsaber Cutting power
A lightsaber blade was a massless form that neither radiated heat nor expended energy until it came into contact with something solid. The power of the energy blade was so great that it could cut through almost anything, although the speed through which it cut depended on the density of the subject. One important note about lightsaber wounds is that they rarely bleed profusely, even when a limb had been severed. This is because the energy blade cauterized the wound as it passed, and thus even a severe wound did not tend to bleed heavily.
When cutting through dense material, the immense electromagnetic field generated by the arc causes resistance rather than letting solid matter enter and interrupt the arc. This gives the blade a feeling of being solid when immersed in dense material. Rarely, some solid materials can actually pass through the electromagnetic field and short out the arc. Other Electromagnetic energy fields and coherent energy are also repelled by lightsabers' arcs. These include most force fields, blaster bolts, and other lightsaber blades.
How it works
The lightsaber's hilt consisted of an alloy cylinder traditionally 25 to 30 centimeters long; however, design and dimensions of hilts varied greatly in part to the preferences and needs of each creator. The hilt casing contained the intricate components that created and shaped the unique blade. High-powered energy was unleashed through a series of positively charged focusing lenses and energizers, manifesting a beam of energy that extended outward from the base to a length of about a meter, then arced circumferentially back to a negatively charged fissure ringing the emitter. A superconductor completed the power loop by feeding the transformed energy back into the internal power cell, where the energy loop began anew. By adding up to three focusing crystals of varying attributes, [source?] the blade's length and power output could be adjusted using control mechanisms built into the hilt's shaft.
Originally posted by Final Blaxican
I noticed.And I'm saying, that I think it's a bit unfair to do so.
With no offense intended, why?
Does this person have special privilege to call someone a twit? Why is it unfair of me to call him out and tell him to stop commentary that can, and, most likely, will, lead to chaos?
Originally posted by Final Blaxican
If you're a police officer and you arrive at a hotpot and you see twenty guys shooting at each other and random pedestrians, would you shoot one, and then walk away?
Again, you miss my premise, FB.
Explain to me how me telling someone to stop name calling in order to avoid confrontation is wrong.
Have I "shot anyone"? Have I "walked away"? Negative. I am trying to prevent a shitstorm. Plain and simple. I would appreciate it if you would not challenge my decisions. I've never had a problem with you, and I do not wish to begin one now.
End.
Originally posted by Final Blaxican
I didn't say it was wrong. 😐I said, telling one person when three others were doig the same thing is unfair.
If you'd like, I can go quote all the over aggression that's been going on in this thread. But, you're the boss.
So that's fine, man.
I only go by what I see. I saw, with my own eyes, someone calling another person a twit. Uncalled for. I corrected said problem.
If, in fact, you say that other posters were, also, in the wrong, then, very much so, I will do everything that I can to help solve your dilemma. Plain and true.
All I ask is that you present a valid argument to me before you make such comments.
Also, I do not, nor have I ever, considered myself to be "the boss". I am just another member here who enjoys posting int he same forums that you do. My job is to clean up all of the dumb ass shit that ensues, and it oh so does, almost everyday. Just because I am called Moderator, does not mean that I position myself over you.
Originally posted by Impediment
I only go by what I see. I saw, with my own eyes, someone calling another person a twit. Uncalled for. I corrected said problem.If, in fact, you say that other posters were, also, in the wrong, then, very much so, I will do everything that I can to help solve your dilemma. Plain and true.
All I ask is that you present a valid argument to me before you make such comments.
Also, I do not, nor have I ever, considered myself to be "the boss". I am just another member here who enjoys posting int he same forums that you do. My job is to clean up all of the dumb ass shit that ensues, and it oh so does, almost everyday. Just because I am called Moderator, does not mean that I position myself over you.
Oh no no, when I say "The boss", it's just a figure of speech. I consider you to be the boss. 😂