Watchmen

Started by Alpha Centauri50 pages

It's funny how now matter the amount of times you break the argument down, there's always a fool or two who simply do not get the point of why people don't agree with this adaptation.

-AC

Might be good. Will certainly watch it. Trailer looks alright.

Never considered actually evolving your style, Bardock?

-AC

Originally posted by Alpha Centauri
Never considered actually evolving your style, Bardock?

-AC

Don't change what fits.

Originally posted by Alpha Centauri
It's funny how now matter the amount of times you break the argument down, there's always a fool or two who simply do not get the point of why people don't agree with this adaptation.

-AC

Ha ha. Welcome back, AC. Try not get perm banned this time. It'd be dull around here without you.

It's not often within my hands, Imp.

But I feel that would be more suited to a detailed PM than to get into it with you here, if you're curious you can PM me.

Thanks, though.

-AC

Originally posted by Da Joker
How is it lame? The fact that I think it'll be pretty good and one of the best is because I'm excited because of the trailer and all of the featurettes I've read about it? Or are you calling me lame because you can't come to terms with the fact that you're a loser who can't keep his hand out of his pants? 😉

Please, just stop. You sound like a fool.

Originally posted by S_D_J
It seems that way: Ozymandias' costume has nipples 😑

I too don't like the costumes... and Jon's crystal palace (I think they should have stuck to the original design) other than that looks ok

C'man, of course Ozy's would have nipples.

Originally posted by Bardock42
Might be good. Will certainly watch it. Trailer looks alright.

Indeed, it looks interesting. I'm especially looking forward to seeing Dr. Manhattan.

It won't necessarily be a disaster. I'll almost certainly watch it, at least. I just hope that they assume a fair amount of intelligence in the viewer and don't dumb the film down too much. It had better at least stay true to the spirit of Watchmen, even if parts must be cut out, which is, I suppose, understandable.

Why are people talking about staying true?

The fact that this movie is being made is not staying true to Watchmen.

-AC

I have a question(please don't get all butt-hurt over it, I'm genuinely curious):

Why is there such a "snobby" attitude pertaining to this movie? Let me explain. Maybe I have to read the novel, I don't know, but it sounds to me like people are treating this like The Bible being put on film by Joel Schumaker. Why can't it just be another comic book movie? If it's good it's good, if it's not it's not. What I gather is that people like seeming intellectual by liking/knowing the novel and they don't want their Holy Grail sullied onscreen. "I just hope that they assume a fair amount of intelligence in the viewer and don't dumb the film down too much." Why is this statement necessary? Are the Watchmen Bio-engineering professors or something?

PEACE

Originally posted by SpaceMonkey
I have a question(please don't get all butt-hurt over it, I'm genuinely curious):

Why is there such a "snobby" attitude pertaining to this movie? Let me explain. Maybe I have to read the novel, I don't know, but it sounds to me like people are treating this like The Bible being put on film by Joel Schumaker. Why can't it just be another comic book movie? If it's good it's good, if it's not it's not. What I gather is that people like seeming intellectual by liking/knowing the novel and they don't want their Holy Grail sullied onscreen. "I just hope that they assume a fair amount of intelligence in the viewer and don't dumb the film down too much." Why is this statement necessary? Are the Watchmen Bio-engineering professors or something?

PEACE

It's a good and intelligent comic. I guess it's that people just don't want what they liked in it to be dumbed down to appeal to the greater masses. Kinda like how some people would object if a movie version of Ulysses would star Chuck Norris and be about Leopold Bloom roundhouse kicking his way through Dublin.

Originally posted by Bardock42
It's a good and intelligent comic. I guess it's that people just don't want what they liked in it to be dumbed down to appeal to the greater masses. Kinda like how some people would object if a movie version of Ulysses would star Chuck Norris and be about Leopold Bloom roundhouse kicking his way through Dublin.

LOL!!!! OK, great explanation. Thanks.

That would be a great movie with Chuck Norris though!

Originally posted by SpaceMonkey
Why can't it just be another comic book movie?

Why do people insist on commenting if they've not read the book?

-AC

Hey, even if this film's a complete disaster, at least we'll get to see Alan Moore go a little bit crazier, which sounds pretty crazy.
If you can get crazier than worshipping a Roman snake god which you confess is in fact a 'complete hoax'...
Crazy old prick/ genius...

Originally posted by Alpha Centauri
Why do people insist on commenting if they've not read the book?

-AC

2 reasons:

1. Free Speech
2. This is Killer MOVIES.com, not Killer BOOKS.com, and I want to see the movie based on the trailer. That's why I'm asking questions.

OK, now I'm not happy. Apparently, a game will be released. Some kind of 'prequel' to the film with Rorschach and Nite-Owl as playable characters. Oh dear...

Originally posted by Almighty Bauer
OK, now I'm not happy. Apparently, a game will be released. Some kind of 'prequel' to the film with Rorschach and Nite-Owl as playable characters. Oh dear...
Oh well, they will try to milk it as much as possible.

Originally posted by SpaceMonkey
2 reasons:

1. Free Speech
2. This is Killer MOVIES.com, not Killer BOOKS.com, and I want to see the movie based on the trailer. That's why I'm asking questions.

Then ask objectively, don't ask in a negatively tinged post that suggests those of us pissed off at the movie are wrong, or overrating the book, when you have no knowledge.

-AC