Thor vs Thanos

Originally posted by xJLxKing
Beating someone using your backhand blast(or w.e. it was) shows you are using all your power.

WTF are you talking about.

Originally posted by quanchi112
No, it really wasn't. Odin complimented him. Thanos wasn't even ko'd so why act like his best feat was not dying when he wasn't even defeated.

Face it man. This is about you not wanting to be wrong. Odin was clearly superior to Thanos in every way. He lost bad... Odin had to be convinced to stop because clearly Thanos wasn't going to win.

Originally posted by quanchi112
Odin was winning and that's all we know. The fight was a longer fight compared to comic book battles on average.

Odin won. Period. Admit it, and let's get this sillyness over with already.

Originally posted by Avlon
Face it man. This is about you not wanting to be wrong. Odin was clearly superior to Thanos in every way. He lost bad... Odin had to be convinced to stop because clearly Thanos wasn't going to win.

Odin won. Period. Admit it, and let's get this sillyness over with already.

Odin was winning. Period. There was no victor in this fight and you know it.

Originally posted by quanchi112
What criteria do you need to prove that Odin went all-out?

Actual proof and not speculation.

Originally posted by Nihilist
WTF are you talking about.

Originally posted by Silent Master
Actual proof and not speculation.

Originally posted by quanchi112
Such as what? What counts as actual proof to you?

Again, actual proof and not speculation.

Originally posted by Silent Master
Again, actual proof and not speculation.

Main Entry: 1proof
Pronunciation: \ˈprüf\
Function: noun
Etymology: Middle English prof, prove, alteration of preve, from Anglo-French preove, from Late Latin proba, from Latin probare to prove — more at prove
Date: 13th century
1 a: the cogency of evidence that compels acceptance by the mind of a truth or a fact b: the process or an instance of establishing the validity of a statement especially by derivation from other statements in accordance with principles of reasoning
2obsolete : experience
3: something that induces certainty or establishes validity
4archaic : the quality or state of having been tested or tried ; especially : unyielding hardness
5: evidence operating to determine the finding or judgment of a tribunal

Originally posted by xJLxKing
I was referring to this
http://www.killermovies.com/forums/attachment.php?s=&postid=4512588

Originally posted by Silent Master
Main Entry: 1proof
Pronunciation: \ˈprüf\
Function: noun
Etymology: Middle English prof, prove, alteration of preve, from Anglo-French preove, from Late Latin proba, from Latin probare to prove — more at prove
Date: 13th century
1 a: the cogency of evidence that compels acceptance by the mind of a truth or a fact b: the process or an instance of establishing the validity of a statement especially by derivation from other statements in accordance with principles of reasoning
2obsolete : experience
3: something that induces certainty or establishes validity
4archaic : the quality or state of having been tested or tried ; especially : unyielding hardness
5: evidence operating to determine the finding or judgment of a tribunal

So, are you claiming that Odin was going all out?

Originally posted by Nihilist
What about that.

I was trying to say. If you can use your backhand and knock someone like that, then there is a clear power difference.

Originally posted by Silent Master
So, are you claiming that Odin was going all out?

Originally posted by xJLxKing
There was a typo before.

I was trying to say. If you can use your backhand and knock someone like that, then there is a clear power difference.

Originally posted by quanchi112
I'm trying to figure out when Odin went all -out according to you. Since you claimed there is no proof I'd like to know when there was proof according to you. It's a simple question so why not answer it?

Yes or no.

Are you claiming that Odin was going all out.

Originally posted by Silent Master
Yes or no.

Are you claiming that Odin was going all out.

Originally posted by xJLxKing
There was a typo before.

I was trying to say. If you can use your backhand and knock someone like that, then there is a clear power difference.

you still havent repsoned to this

Have you ever seen Odin use the Odinforce through the Gungnir before?

On occasions it looks the same as when he used it on Thanos, but that doesnt matter at all i suppose.

Originally posted by quanchi112
So, you answer my question with a question of your own. That isn't how it works on here. There is no proof as to suggest he was holding back.

Great, so now you're accusing me of doing to you what you've spent the last several posts doing to me.

The only one arguing in circles here is you.

Originally posted by quanchi112
No, he was winning, but hadn't won. He thought he did, but Thanos clearly wanted to continue. The battle was going to continue, but it was interrupted.

Odin was winning, a fresh Thanos couldn't do anything, so you think a weakened Thanos was going to do better somehow?

Even is PIS device forceblock that he used because he couldn't defeat a vastly weaker Thor was practically laughed at.

Originally posted by quanchi112
Odin was winning. Period. There was no victor in this fight and you know it.

We both know it's your stubborness at work here.

Thanos wasn't anywhere near Odins class, he was pimpsmacked around, his most powerful sneak attack failed miserably, and the IW saved him since he was clearly failing.

Odin won. Period. Thanos side threw in the towel. Thanos surely didn't continue the fight after the Watch convinced Odin. It's not like they restrained him.