Originally posted by Silent MasterWhy don't you answer my question. We can get somewhere if you tell me what constitutes as proof to you that Odin was going all out.
Great, so now you're accusing me of doing to you what you've spent the last several posts doing to me.The only one arguing in circles here is you.
I already answered that question.
Main Entry: 1proof
Pronunciation: \ˈprüf\
Function: noun
Etymology: Middle English prof, prove, alteration of preve, from Anglo-French preove, from Late Latin proba, from Latin probare to prove — more at prove
Date: 13th century
1 a: the cogency of evidence that compels acceptance by the mind of a truth or a fact b: the process or an instance of establishing the validity of a statement especially by derivation from other statements in accordance with principles of reasoning
2obsolete : experience
3: something that induces certainty or establishes validity
4archaic : the quality or state of having been tested or tried ; especially : unyielding hardness
5: evidence operating to determine the finding or judgment of a tribunal
Besides, I asked my questions first and you still haven't answered them.
Originally posted by Silent MasterNo, I don't want the definition. I want you to tell me when you knew Odin was going all out before and how you knew it.
I already answered that question.Main Entry: 1proof
Pronunciation: \ˈprüf\
Function: noun
Etymology: Middle English prof, prove, alteration of preve, from Anglo-French preove, from Late Latin proba, from Latin probare to prove — more at prove
Date: 13th century
1 a: the cogency of evidence that compels acceptance by the mind of a truth or a fact b: the process or an instance of establishing the validity of a statement especially by derivation from other statements in accordance with principles of reasoning
2obsolete : experience
3: something that induces certainty or establishes validity
4archaic : the quality or state of having been tested or tried ; especially : unyielding hardness
5: evidence operating to determine the finding or judgment of a tribunalBesides, I asked my questions first and you still haven't answered them.
Originally posted by Silent MasterWell, if I know what constitutes as proof to you I can begin to make a case.
My opinion on when Odin has gone all out has zero to do with whether you're claiming that Odin was going all out in the Thanos fight.Now, are you claiming that Odin was going all out in the Thanos fight?
Originally posted by AvlonThanos wasnt getting pimpsmacked around or even knocked off his feet ,all Odin did was unbalance him, he only started getting knocked/blasted around was when Odin used his staff.
Odin was winning, a fresh Thanos couldn't do anything, so you think a weakened Thanos was going to do better somehow?Even is PIS device forceblock that he used because he couldn't defeat a vastly weaker Thor was practically laughed at.
We both know it's your stubborness at work here.
Thanos wasn't anywhere near Odins class, he was pimpsmacked around, his most powerful sneak attack failed miserably, and the IW saved him since he was clearly failing.
Odin won. Period. Thanos side threw in the towel. Thanos surely didn't continue the fight after the Watch convinced Odin. It's not like they restrained him.
So you honestly dont think from not being able to budge/effect to being able to launch Galactus throught the hull of his ship and a few hundred feet(i know galactus isnt harmed,but Odin and Galactus are to entirely diiferent beings) wouldnt make any difference.
Originally posted by Silent MasterWell, I want to know what you consider going all out. If it falls short you will continue to say there is no valid proof. Tell me what constitutes as valid proof.
We aren't the same person, therefore my opinion on whether Odin has ever gone all out has zero impact on whether you're claiming that he did so in the Thanos fight.Now, are you claiming that Odin went all out in the Thanos fight?
Originally posted by quanchi112
The fight wasn't over and had it continued we don't know if he would have needed the odinsleep or not.
Thanos also did not use his full abilities. Shielding, for instance, was completely absent. I think Thanos fought simply for the challenge and thrill. As he did against PG Thor and Tyrant. While Odin was clearly fighting to defend his realm, which was being invaded, as well as to free his imprisoned son. Foolish to think that Odin wasn't trying to put Thanos down - which he could not do.
Thanos clearly had more left in the tank, otherwise he wouldn't have been able to get up. At that point in time though, I think Quan would even admit that had the battle gone on, Thanos would have lost or been forced to retreat. He's been upgraded since.
That's all the point he's trying to make.