Borbarad
Advocatus Diaboli
Originally posted by truejedi
If you DID lift the 20k lbs, then indeed it is NOT exaggerating to say so.
If the only account for lifting that weight are my words, how do you know if it was exaggerated or not?
Since Mace DID destroy an army with his fists, it is NOT exaggerating to say so.
First: Even in the CW Cartoon, he doesn't destroy the entire army with his fists.
Second: How do you know if the amount of droids he destroyed wasn't exeggerated, if the only source showing this battle is one that's creator proclaimed to feature exeggerations? Maybe he just destroyed one droid using his fists. Maybe he didn't do that at all.
Since Yoda DID smash ships together, it is NOT exaggerating to say so.
Again: How can you know, if the only source for this is one that features exaggeration in terms of action? Did Yoda really smash those ships together? Did he smash smaller ships together?
These things DID happen, therefore the feats themselves are not exaggerated. The overall concept of force use is exaggerated, but the feats themselves happened, and therefore ARE a measuring stick of their abilities.
No. The Battle of Dantooine happened and Mace, somehow defeated the droid army. Did he do it with his fists? Or is that an exeggerated display of his force aided strength and ability? We don't know. Did Yoda push those ships, or was that an exeggerated display of force use, to emphasize his extraordinary powers? We don't know.
Of course, it's likely that Mace and Yoda are capable of performing that feats, but since the only source showing them features exeggeration of the same abilities used to perform that feats/i], we need further context to determine what [i]really happened - or rather than that, if it happened like it's shown on screen.
Why is that so hard to understand? You are supposed to be intelligent, but here you fail, and hard.
Funny.
I tell you a story. Then I tell you that the story featured some exeggerations. After I did that, you proclaim I presented the absolute and undenyable truth to you. You don't see any lack in terms of reasoning here? Then it's not me who fails here...hard.
@Sidious 66:
Originally posted by SIDIOUS 66
Actually, it was stated in the commentary of the old cartoons that the feats shown are what the jedi were capable of if they did releash there full power. I believe it was said during Mace's scene on dantooine, either that or it was the part where Yoda callapsed part of the mountain on those droids.
Nope. It's stated that the cartoons were close to what Lucas imagined the Jedi to be, but he couldn't realize them like that in the films. Do you really want to discuss the machinations of canon now? Theoretically, Lucas words are absolute. So when he says the show depicts the Jedi better than his own movies, we would have to accept that as gospel. But this would put every further SW source into question, because they do follow the - then less accurate - films.
Simply proclaiming "but it ISN'T canon" does not help either, especially when what is shown contradicts your claim.
And who did proclaim that? It certainly wasn't me. So?
If we go by your logic, then TFU is not canon either since every jedi in it out did anything Yoda has displayed in the movies feat-wise. No one said it was a good idea, but neither was the way Vader easily killed Palpatine after seeing what Palpatine was capable of during his battle with Yoda.
Apparently, you don't even understand my logic, so you might step away from trying to apply it to other situations. What Yoda displayed in the movies is clearly not the apex of his abilities (save for lightsaber duelling probably). And how do you even compare the TFU feats to the movie feats. Have you found the "potential need to perform force move X" chart somewhere, that enables you to accurately judge feats featuring a metaphysical energy field?
My point was that if we have just one source and we are told that this source features exeggeration of the things happening, we can't simply accept anything contained in the source without questioning. That's also true for TFU and, well, the novel certainly makes people look quite less powerful than the game itself does. This was also the case when WotC released the Dark Forces saga, which "downgraded" Kyle Katarn quite a bit.
Do you remember which part of the dvd of vol. 1 where the commentary said the feats shown are exaggerated?
I'd have to rewatch it, but I think it was during the battle of Mace on Dantooine.