U.S. Expected to Own 70% of Restructured G.M.

Originally posted by leonheartmm
i call it liberal socialism actually. and it was proposed by russel. onership, but no trade.

So do you support Communism or private ownership?

^both. i support people making money only when they put in the labour. with private ownership and inability to trade, you have the psychological satisfaction of owning anything u can while still having the bunds which stop you from making money off of money without putting in the labour.

Originally posted by leonheartmm
^both. i support people making money only when they put in the labour.

So you're against welfare programs that pay money to the poor who don't work?

Originally posted by leonheartmm
you have the psychological satisfaction of owning anything u can while still having the bunds which stop you from making money off of money without putting in the labour.

Can you explain this? I don't know what you mean by 'bunds'?

And do you realize that if we had communism, you would not have private ownership, correct?

You seem to be changing the definition of Communism and then agreeing with it.

"I support Communism and private ownership"

Do you REALLY not see how that just doesn't work?

^i wud explain it to u, if u were a half decent person who cared.

Originally posted by leonheartmm
^i wud explain it to u, if u were a half decent person who cared.

You hurt my feelings ❌

Continue fighting for that dream utopia of Communism and private ownership for all..it's a noble fight buddy, keep it up.

Don't buy and don't want Government Motors. 👇

Originally posted by WhoopeeDee
Don't buy and don't want Government Motors. 👇

Originally posted by WhoopeeDee
Don't buy and don't want Government Motors. 👇

What if, theoretically, they produce incredibly awesome cars for cheap?

Originally posted by Symmetric Chaos
What if...

Yeah, there is your problem...my wallet goes with what it is...not what if...I'm not buying.

Originally posted by Symmetric Chaos
What if, theoretically, they produce incredibly awesome cars for cheap?

Likely scenario.

We all know how efficient the government is.

wut?

Originally posted by WhoopeeDee
Yeah, there is your problem...my wallet goes with what it is...not what if...I'm not buying.

Originally posted by KidRock
Likely scenario.

We all know how efficient the government is.

wut?

Stimulus money is being spent on rural roads and bridges...they're also charging 300 dollars per sign that states "construction ahead"..300$, per sign.

I wonder what passenger side airbags will cost me..my left arm?

Originally posted by KidRock
Stimulus money is being spent on rural roads and bridges...

The horror of infrastructure! nuts

Originally posted by KidRock
they're also charging 300 dollars per sign that states "construction ahead"..300$, per sign.

😂 I wonder who's idea that was.

Originally posted by leonheartmm
communism is a GOOD thing. thats what no1 gets. as long as people can own private property, minus the trade rights. idiot cons and propagadists throw out the term "communism" like its a vulgar insult and the final word in the argument. it just like any other taboo. driven by stupidity,

I don't agree with your ludicrous definition of what communism is. But I do agree with the stupidity that drives it to be a bard word, in America. This does not seem to be the case anywhere, except in the land of the stupid and the poor.

Originally posted by KidRock
Stimulus money is being spent on rural roads and bridges...

Originally posted by KidRock
they're also charging 300 dollars per sign that states "construction ahead"..300$, per sign.

You bastards obviously don't know how expensive signs are.

My dad was a signmaker and those things cost a shitload!

Originally posted by Symmetric Chaos
The horror of infrastructure! nuts

😂 I wonder who's idea that was.

There is nothing wrong with infrastructure development. The point is how inefficient the government is with everything they do.

They pay 300 dollars for a sign and I am suppose to believe they will sell me a cheap car or cheap health insurance?

Government is insufficient because they have obligations to lobbyists who's backers demand cuts of things they really have no right to be interfering in.

Originally posted by KidRock
They pay 300 dollars for a sign and I am suppose to believe they will sell me a cheap car or cheap health insurance?

Well context, more information and a source for the first claim would be nice before I rush to a conclusion.