Mighella vs. Obi-Wan Kenobi (TPM)

Originally posted by Borbarad
How about not trying to play IKC - only one of the roles you miserably fail at - and stop your hilarious attempts to spot and point out logical fallacies. A double-standard? So, when exactly have I asked you to prove that one of your insults was correct, which would be necessary for me to commit a double-standard?

Just look above and see why this is "illogical" - because you didn't take Kenobi's unique state into consideration and attempted to apply his skill level shown there to another fight.

Sexy...
Didn't I just tell you to stop the trolling? You can make a poll to see how many people here believe you ["I'm not TDTD" "I have sources"] and how many people believe my words. Have fun with it. I'm not interested in your personal perceptions of reality or in the size of your e-peen. Time to get that into your head. [/B]

🙄

Originally posted by Dr McBeefington
IKC? Wtf? Wow Nai you respond to my point about you making bullshit assumptions with...Bullshit assumptions?

Welcome to "dodging the point with Sexy" once again. Here, the great master himself has shown us how to evade stuff that hurts. You need some "WTF?", a little "bullshit" and of course the big word "assumption" here, and your dodgery dodge soup can be served.

And the double standard would you be peddling the illusion that I have no sources, and then criticizing me when I prove your bullshit wrong. That's a double standard, get it? I can't be any clearer.

Excuse me, Sexy. Where have you "proven my bullshit wrong"? Did I, by any chance, miss the picture that shows you with even one SW source or can it be, that you are still just repeating the "No. You're wrong" without getting anywhere because I don't give a damn, while the audience just laughs at your attempts to remain right somewhere because you miserably failed to do so at the original topic?

I didn't take his normal state into consideration and that's where I was wrong. However my main argument was about Kenobi's performance against Maul in the state he was in.

Oh wow. Sexy. Gosh.
Let me just recap this: The self-proclaimed nigh-genius future top-lawyer has failed to comprehend, that exceptional circumstances aren't equal to normality. As if this alone isn't hilarious enough, the same self-proclaimed nigh-genius future top-lawyer, even after realizing that he was dealing with an exceptional situation does - and this is incarnated awesome - still call Kenobi's performance in this exceptional situation his main argument.

So Sexy is trying to remain right in a point, that doesn't even touch the original topic and then he tries to justify his ignorance (note: his words are still > Kenobi's words, when judging Kenobi's performance) with...oh...sorry...there is no justification for this utter lack of common sense, reason, logic, reading comprehension or - in short - every quality that would distinquish a good debater.

🙄

If you weren't interested then you wouldn't make yourself look retarded by doing the thing you do best. Argue, make a retarded attempt at humor, and then use the last resort of calling me a sock and a troll.

Sexy. Using a "last resort" would imply that I'm losing, when - de facto - I just kicked your sorry ass across the place, just in case you still haven't noticed that I grinded your entire "argument" into tiny little bits. One could think that the only person who is using a "last resort" here, is you, with your constant attempts to lure the attention away from the original debate, which you utterly lost.

Sure we can make a poll but you(like Faunus before you) will realize that you will lose and I will be once again instructed to ignore baseless accusations. This agenda failed on this forum and I have no doubt you're peddling the same agenda elsewhere(faunus-style) to try and gain some sort of acceptance. Keep trying though.

Sexy. Your inability to ignore the "baseless accusations" speaks for itself. And "lose"? Every single time you burst into a temper-tantrum, because somebody calls you TDTD, which happens just every second post, I win. Hell. You're even upset because of that, when I'm not even mentioning it. So how did I lose or fail? Because you're still posting here? That would imply that I was trying to get you banned - and why would I, considering that you offer cheap entertainment whenever I get bored?

Originally posted by Borbarad
Welcome to "dodging the point with Sexy" once again. Here, the great master himself has shown us how to evade stuff that hurts. You need some "WTF?", a little "bullshit" and of course the big word "assumption" here, and your dodgery dodge soup can be served.

Excuse me, Sexy. Where have you "proven my bullshit wrong"? Did I, by any chance, miss the picture that shows you with even one SW source or can it be, that you are still just repeating the "No. You're wrong" without getting anywhere because [b]I don't give a damn, while the audience just laughs at your attempts to remain right somewhere because you miserably failed to do so at the original topic?

Oh wow. Sexy. Gosh.
Let me just recap this: The self-proclaimed nigh-genius future top-lawyer has failed to comprehend, that exceptional circumstances aren't equal to normality. As if this alone isn't hilarious enough, the same self-proclaimed nigh-genius future top-lawyer, even after realizing that he was dealing with an exceptional situation does - and this is incarnated awesome - still call Kenobi's performance in this exceptional situation his main argument.

So Sexy is trying to remain right in a point, that doesn't even touch the original topic and then he tries to justify his ignorance (note: his words are still > Kenobi's words, when judging Kenobi's performance) with...oh...sorry...there is no justification for this utter lack of common sense, reason, logic, reading comprehension or - in short - every quality that would distinquish a good debater.

🙄

Sexy. Using a "last resort" would imply that I'm losing, when - de facto - I just kicked your sorry ass across the place, just in case you still haven't noticed that I grinded your entire "argument" into tiny little bits. One could think that the only person who is using a "last resort" here, is you, with your constant attempts to lure the attention away from the original debate, which you utterly lost.

Sexy. Your inability to ignore the "baseless accusations" speaks for itself. And "lose"? Every single time you burst into a temper-tantrum, because somebody calls you TDTD, which happens just every second post, I win. Hell. You're even upset because of that, when I'm not even mentioning it. So how did I lose or fail? Because you're still posting here? That would imply that I was trying to get you banned - and why would I, considering that you offer cheap entertainment whenever I get bored? [/B]

1. Argue something
2. Argue something with weak sarcasm and a cheap attempt at humor
3. #2 but with a mix of hilarious insults
4. #2, #3, and add "troll" and "sock".

Once again Nai, you've proven to be the KMC comic relief.

Here we go Nai, and again I expect you to take this to your superiors because like most internet pseudo intellectuals with low self esteem, they need to blog or tweet about their endeavors. Here is the list

1. NEC
2. JvS
3. All TOTJ comics
4. All movie novels
5. All legacy comics
6. Sithesis and short stories
7. Dark Rendezvous
8. Death Star
9. Rise of Darth Vader
10. All LOTF novels
11. All FOTJ novels

And that's just what's in my room. You are free to test me on these sources, so you'll finally realize to think before you type.

Sexy:

a) You lost the debate.
b) I'm not interested in any blah blah [read: pointless trolling] that hasn't something to do with the topic here.

Since you offered nothing new, and just repeated how you are absolutely correct, despite all the errors I pointed out in your "reasoning", and tried to justify your own ignorance (and, as usually, failed), I'll simply take your helplessness as concession. Game over.

Edit: I was riding FauNuts. K?

If you're gonna ride my nuts, and give make it clear that its my nuts you're riding. Don't take all the credit for yourself in your closing remarks.

ForeiTroll. 🙄

I didn't read your posts notice that give a damn want to keep the credit for myself.

Originally posted by Borbarad
Sexy:

a) You lost the debate.
b) I'm not interested in any blah blah [read: pointless trolling] that hasn't something to do with the topic here.

Since you offered nothing new, and just repeated how you are absolutely correct, despite all the errors I pointed out in your "reasoning", and tried to justify your own ignorance (and, as usually, failed), I'll simply take your helplessness as concession. Game over.

Edit: I was riding FauNuts. K?

A. I'm well aware of this, before you came in for the rescue.
B. If you weren't interested in "blah blah" or the pointless trolling you introduced in the form of hilarious accusations, you wouldn't have brought them up. Then again, you're only interested because you're too stupid to back up what you're saying. So much for common sense.

Originally posted by Dr McBeefington
A. I'm well aware of this, before you came in for the rescue.

Oh. So you kept arguing despite knowing that you were wrong? Great. Tells me a lot about your personality.

B. If you weren't interested in "blah blah" or the pointless trolling you introduced in the form of hilarious accusations, you wouldn't have brought them up. Then again, you're only interested because you're too stupid to back up what you're saying. So much for common sense.

Sexy. I'm sure you want to stay in the roll of "smart law student", but don't bother me with your interpretation of an "insult" as an "assertion that has to be proven". Instead of shouting "Proof?" you should have typed "insult" or ignored it entirely, which is what I did with your Nazi comment. So much for "common sense", indeed.

Nai
I was riding FauNuts. K?

DS
I'm well aware [that I lost the debate to Eminence] before you came in for the rescue.

This thread is a testament to my glory.

Originally posted by Borbarad
Oh. So you kept arguing despite knowing that you were wrong? Great. Tells me a lot about your personality.

Sexy. I'm sure you want to stay in the roll of "smart law student", but don't bother me with your interpretation of an "insult" as an "assertion that has to be proven". Instead of shouting "Proof?" you should have typed "insult" or ignored it entirely, which is what I did with your Nazi comment. So much for "common sense", indeed.

Nai, if there's one thing I learned from you it's any moron can attempt to be intelligent and fail miserably. Another thing I learned is that if I was Nai Fohl, I could make up random bullshit without backing it up, and generally make whatever assertions I want as long as it doesn't pertain to the debate. Then I can engage in double standards and claim the other person is stupid for even bringing it up.

Originally posted by Dr McBeefington
No Nai, I now know why I was wrong and it was before you and I argued.

And who did show you that you were wrong? You figured that out yourself, genius, right?

Nai, if there's one thing I learned from you it's any moron can attempt to be intelligent and fail miserably.

Since I used you as example to prove that, the credit goes to yourself.

Another thing I learned is that if I was Nai Fohl, I could make up random bullshit without backing it up, and generally make whatever assertions I want as long as it doesn't pertain to the debate. Then I can engage in double standards and claim the other person is stupid for even bringing it up.

Still not getting it? I just insulted you, which isn't an assertion. An "assertion" would have been something like: "You don't have any source material, so you can't contribute anything to the debate". Applying your great reasoning, you certainly have proof that I'm a Nazi, correct? This great insult actually shows all one has to know about you, Sexy. I say "Hey. You don't have sources", and you, in turn, compare me to people responsible for the industrial annihilation of several million human lives. And, because you don't make baseless "assertions" like that, you have proof that I'm a Nazi, correct? 🙄

Originally posted by Borbarad
Since I used you as example to prove that, the credit goes to yourself.

Still not getting it? I just insulted you, which isn't an assertion. An "assertion" would have been something like: "You don't have any source material, so you can't contribute anything to the debate". Applying your great reasoning, you certainly have proof that I'm a Nazi, correct? This great insult actually shows all one has to know about you, Sexy. I say "Hey. You don't have sources", and you, in turn, compare me to people responsible for the industrial annihilation of several million human lives. And, because you don't make baseless "assertions" like that, you have proof that I'm a Nazi, correct? 🙄 [/B]

Originally posted by Dr McBeefington
Oh I get it Nai, the usual I know you are but what am I game. And yes, you showed me, congratulations.

It's always fun to beat your silly ass, Beef.

Wow you're dense. You claimed I have no sources. That may be an insult but even to the biggest simpleton(you), it's still a claim. And you're comparing your claim to me making a random Nazi reference? That's hilarious Nai.

No, Sexy. A "random Nazi reference" is exactly the same that making a "random reference" to the multiple occassions, on which you have pointed to others to present quotes for you, with the exception that I had a reason for the reference. The only "hilarious" thing is that you tried - and still try - to raise a fuzz because of that. Why? Because you just want to beat me once, going that you never managed to do it in a debate regarding the SWU, you now try it this way. Wow. Okay: I had no reason to "assume" that you have no source material. I concede. Are you pleased now? Go and mark the date red on your calender.

I love how you misinterpret virtually...Everything. But hey, you're the one calling an obvious assertion, nothing more than an insult so who am I to argue ROFL.

Yes. Finally the correct question: Who are you to "argue" against anybody here?

Originally posted by Borbarad
It's always fun to beat your silly ass, Beef.

No, Sexy. A "random Nazi reference" is exactly the same that making a "random reference" to the multiple occassions, on which you have pointed to others to present quotes for you, with the exception that [b]I had a reason for the reference. The only "hilarious" thing is that you tried - and still try - to raise a fuzz because of that. Why? Because you just want to beat me once, going that you never managed to do it in a debate regarding the SWU, you now try it this way. Wow. Okay: I had no reason to "assume" that you have no source material. I concede. Are you pleased now? Go and mark the date red on your calender.

Yes. Finally the correct question: Who are you to "argue" against anybody here? [/B]

Once again Nai, if you're allowed to waste bandwidth with your constant nonsense, I have that same right.

Originally posted by Eminence
I have conquered you all.

This thread is a testament to my glory.

I hate you.