Originally posted by Doctor-AlvisDo I really need to point out that The asgardians are part of the viking mythos AGAIN?
I never said Vikings weren't Norse. I'm pointing out they aren't from Asgard.
Why would they have a different fighting style? And then there's valhalla... I mean your arguments just don't make any sense.
The problem is the same that people keep pointing out about Wolveirne and other martial artists.. since they have these superhuman stats they rarely if ever show it.
And it doesn't matter if you have 2000 years of fighting history if its the same damned thing over and over again, against opponents that use the same style.
Practice doesn't make perfect, perfect practice makes perfect.
Originally posted by Doctor-AlvisOkay lets compare the two... The norse culture was around for like 300 years. The Eastern, since the paleolithic era.
And the rest of my of my post wasn't about any character in particular but more the concept of the value of centuries of fight experience.
Hmm...
Originally posted by Doctor-AlvisI don't. but I pay attention to the history of the cultures that thought these concepts up.
You probably would have picked that up if you read more than two sentences. Christ man. Don't believe in Peter Pan, Frankenstein, or Superman.[/]b
Originally posted by Doctor-AlvisWhy would they if they're fighting the same style over and over? This is evidenced by the fact that whenever they're shown they're using the same fighting styles. regardless of who it is.
[B]So you don't think people with long lives who engage in combat regularly wouldn't naturally evolve?
Originally posted by Doctor-AlvisThat might be. but since that's always whats' ever depicted in the comics... its right up there with gama radiation not obliterating DNA but mutating it and spider bites givign super powers and random chemicals giving super powers.
That they'd be stuck with the exact same moveset they had since day one? That seems silly.
It's part of the comic book history.
Originally posted by Doctor-AlvisThats the problem. the comic books don't support this. Everything you see of these characters are based on that small window of history rather than your evidence supporting the natural evolution of Eastern martial arts.
In cases like Thor or Hercules where their culture is based around fighting, with them trying to constantly outdo each other to prove who's the best, you don't think their natural competitive nature over thousands of years could have given them comparable abilities to someone who instead travels the world to learn completely different styles? Feats aside,
Originally posted by Doctor-AlvisThats the funny thing. the Norse style is not the ancient fighting style. the eastern one is.
we're talking in theory here. I don't mean just because they're old. I mean they have the advantage of time and the competitive nature and need to one up each other. And as they say, necessity is the mother of invention.][/comics] Your arguments are sound as thats how the eastern Martial arts developed. But they're not supported by the comics which only shows us the fighting based on medieval combat.[QUOTE=12191679]Originally posted by Doctor-Alvis
In the example of 900 years of MMA training vs 100 years of MMA training after those 900 years both people have the benefit of actively experimenting and learning hand to hand skills. Let's say they're complete clones of each other. No futuristic enhancements or anything involved. The difference is after 900 years the first one is like frozen in time or something and the 100 year one goes at it for 100 years. Will the 100 year fighter have the advantage because of some crazy martial arts improvement in those 100 years? I really doubt it.