lol, tl:dr warning
so, no more than 3 months ago, I was diagnosed as being type 1 diabetic.
To live, I need to monitor my blood sugar levels. My case isn't so bad, and small insulin injections, 3 times a day at meals, with a second, long lasting, insulin injection at bed, is totally enough to keep my sugars in check (in fact, as I get healthier, my insulin requirements are going down, all I'm really saying is that, as far as diabetes goes, I could be WAY worse).
So, I'll get to the medications in a second, but just as far as doctors visits go: I have had several walk in clinic appointments, normally with blood work and other lab work done. A night in the emergency ward, on going meetings with diabetic specialists and a nutritionist at the hospital, and now at least 2 separate endocrinologists working with me. I'm thinking of going to a third, as I'm more inclined to their style, but whatever. Waiting periods have been, well, non-existent. The endocrinologists have had a couple of months wait, but my condition isn't life threatening, so its not that big a deal. I guess in a private system I might not have to wait until January to meet this new guy, but this was only really an issue when I was first diagnosed. Because there are so few family doctors, and mine is in the city I used to live in (45 min drive, ugh) I initially went to a walk in clinic when I figured out something was up. They prescribed me pills, which was stupid, and better care immediately would likely have been possible in a private system, though, within a week I was seeing a diabetic specialist, because I was vigilant and kept on the system when I didn't think the care was proper.
In all of this, the only direct cost, to me, has been parking at the hospitals and clinics. While there may have been marginal advantages to a private system in my case, it would have prevented many other conveniences. For instance, I would likely not be seeing as many endocrinologists, if any, nor would I be so frequently with the diabetic care specialists. Further, given the initial walk in would have cost a significant amount, I would have been more likely to find out I was a diabetic after slipping into a coma or something else, whereas access to "free" doctors allowed me to be somewhat preventative.
Now, medications in Canada (Ontario at least) are not covered by the government. I am on my father's health plan, so that works well, but soon I will have to use the one I get through school (I'll be 25 and no longer covered by his work). I didn't find any stats on a quick google search, but I've never heard of "uninsured" canadians being refused medicine as a real problem with our system. At the very least, going by the OHIP site (http://www.settlement.org/sys/faqs_detail.asp?faq_id=4000305) there are numerous ways that the government will assist you, and even if I didn't have a specific health plan, there would be a way for me to get the government to assist with meds.
This is good. Because, I currently have over a dozen prescriptions for things that I go through fairly quickly. Contour test strips, which I use 3-5 of a day, cost about $90 for 100. I would die if I didn't have them, and if I had to pay for them, well, I'd be in really bad shape. Insulin is similarily expensive, as are the machines which I test my sugars on, etc.
On paper, there are advantages to either one (private v public). However, when you go through stuff like this, some things becomes abundantly clear. You can't sacrifice the ability of people to have excellent care, just because it might free things up or make things more convenient. I'm in favor of private care being available, but if a government must exist, this is something it owes the people who it gives itself the power to rule.