Originally posted by dadudemon
Your counter-argument was anchored by geographic size."Is it your argument that me paying for someone on the other side of the countries healthcare is warranted because they may SOME DAY do something for me?"
I countered that by citing that UHC can even be at the municipal level, which would satisfy your geographic restriction you listed above.
Meaning, if your argument is contributing to things outside of your local community, then you would obviously support municipal UHC. HEHE! I was more being a smartass than serious, but my point is really is valid.
And your other points about police and fire are the same exact points that one could make about HC insurance.
My argument is anchored on the fact that these people I am paying ACTUALLY DO SOMETHING TO GET PAID BY ME.