Starving Wives in Afganistan

Started by MildPossession9 pages

Could you please answer my question at the top of page 3, Mr. Anderson.

Germany was held by three different countries after the Soviets invaded it.

Hell, there was basically a political war between three world powers in the middle of Germany until the walls were brought down and the armies came out of Germany.

You don't see Germany starving their wives, though, no?

Not to mention the fact that if you would visit Germany now it's in excellent shape. Something I can't really say for Afghanistan.

Originally posted by Spidervlad
Germany was held by three different countries after the Soviets invaded it.

Hell, there was basically a political war between three world powers in the middle of Germany until the walls were brought down and the armies came out of Germany.

You don't see Germany starving their wives, though, no?

Not to mention the fact that if you would visit Germany now it's in excellent shape. Something I can't really say for Afghanistan.

We got some pretty good reconstructionary help though. And our previous "badness" wasn't based in some deep founded and continued spiritual belief.

Germany is pretty awesome though.

Originally posted by Bardock42
And our previous "badness" wasn't based in some deep founded and continued spiritual belief.

Atheist sentiment pwnage, right there.

I'll say it again:

If all religions disappeared right now, the world would be a better place.

Originally posted by ~:Mr.Anderson:~
no, early sixth century was when it was founded. The middle east had in contact with the west.

I suppose that is technically true since it used to be controlled by Rome, but in no way does that give the west credit for Islam. At the time when Mohammed created Islam the Bedouin clans he was part of were quite isolated from europe.

Originally posted by ~:Mr.Anderson:~
i did.

No you didn't. You posted a page that used it's own translation that was proven to be invalid by others in this thread. In the future I would like you to use the following service that allows you to easily search through multiple accepted translations and compare them.

http://www.islamicity.com/QuranSearch/

Originally posted by ~:Mr.Anderson:~
The christian bible doesn't endorse the treatment of women as property.

Coolio. Neither does the quran and at any rate this has zero to do with you claiming the quran is young and is just a pathetic attempt to escape the fact that you were wrong when you claimed it was very young.

Originally posted by ~:Mr.Anderson:~
slight typ-o. I was tired last night.

How about when you said afghanistan was an "Iraqi nation"? Or when you said the "Muslim nation" is at jihad with us when there isn't even a recognized one.

Originally posted by ~:Mr.Anderson:~
done and done.

Yeah you can pick and choose from weird translations, but i'd rather you search through the numerous ones I provide a service for.

Originally posted by dadudemon

If all religions disappeared right now, the world would be a better place.

B-but, b-but where would morals come from!!11??

Secular Humanism?

Originally posted by Spidervlad
Germany was held by three different countries after the Soviets invaded it.

Hell, there was basically a political war between three world powers in the middle of Germany until the walls were brought down and the armies came out of Germany.

You don't see Germany starving their wives, though, no?

Not to mention the fact that if you would visit Germany now it's in excellent shape. Something I can't really say for Afghanistan.

Germany was also one of the most industrialized nations on the planet post ww2

After ww1 might be a better example, as the currency tanked and gross militarization and racism seemed the only solution.

Afghanistan has never had anyone spend the money necessary to even build the initial infrastructure, as it has been a victim of "The Great Game" for centuries, where its land has been a battleground for major powers who want it for various reasons, most recently an oil pipe line (this is all pre-911 though).

Originally posted by King Kandy
Secular Humanism?

but where do they get their morals from?

Originally posted by inimalist
but where do they get their morals from?

Would you please re-ask that in multiple choice form?

Originally posted by Robtard
Would you please re-ask that in multiple choice form?

lol, thats a lot of choices...

Originally posted by Robtard
B-but, b-but where would morals come from!!11??

You mean the thing we evolved to become a more successful species?

BAH!

I flop my genitals at you. I fart in your general direction.

Originally posted by inimalist
but where do they get their morals from?

The exact same place religion gets them . . .

Originally posted by King Kandy
I suppose that is technically true since it used to be controlled by Rome, but in no way does that give the west credit for Islam. At the time when Mohammed created Islam the Bedouin clans he was part of were quite isolated from europe.

that's not the point. The point is, you said that muslims treated women well before western influence. they didn't exist before western influence.

No you didn't. You posted a page that used it's own translation that was proven to be invalid by others in this thread. In the future I would like you to use the following service that allows you to easily search through multiple accepted translations and compare them.

http://www.islamicity.com/QuranSearch/


from your source:
[272] then let him who watches over his interests dictate equitably. And call upon two of your men to act as witnesses; and if two men are not available, then a man and two women from among such as are acceptable to you as witnesses, so that if one of them should make a mistake, the other could remind her. [273]

oh, heres one saying that a woman who has done something immoral will be locked in her house until she starves to death! isn't that nice?
4:15 (Asad) AND AS FOR those of your women who become guilty of immoral conduct, call upon four from among you who have witnessed their guilt; and if these bear witness thereto, confine the guilty women [12] to their houses until death takes them away or God opens for them a way [through repentance].

oh, and heres one (from your source) that describes the way men should take care of women who's ill will YOU HAVE REASON TO FEAR.

# 4:34 (Asad) MEN SHALL take full care of women with the bounties which God has bestowed more abundantly on the former than on the latter, [42] and with what they may spend out of their possessions. And the right_eous women are the truly devout ones, who guard the intimacy which God has [ordained to be] guar_ded. [43] And as for those women whose ill-will [44] you have reason to fear, admonish them [first]; then leave them alone in bed; then beat them; [45] and if thereupon they pay you heed, do not seek to harm them. Behold, God is indeed most high, great!
from this source: http://quranicteachings.co.uk/women.htm
the burkha:
24/31 And say to the believing women that they cast down their looks and guard their chastity and do not display their ornaments except what appears thereof, and let them spread their head-coverings over their bosoms, and not display their ornaments except to their husbands or their fathers, or the fathers of their husbands, or their sons, or the sons of their husbands, or their brothers, or their brothers' sons, or their sisters' sons, or their women, or those whom their right hands possess, or the male servants not having any desire or need (of women), or the children who have not attained knowledge of what is hidden of women; and let them not strike their feet so that what they hide of their ornaments may be known; and turn to Allah all of you, O believers! So that you may be successful.


Coolio. Neither does the quran and at any rate this has zero to do with you claiming the quran is young and is just a pathetic attempt to escape the fact that you were wrong when you claimed it was very young.

it is young, very young. sixth century as opposed to 0AD

How about when you said afghanistan was an "Iraqi nation"? Or when you said the "Muslim nation" is at jihad with us when there isn't even a recognized one.

The first one was a slip because i was quite tired. The muslim nation is at jiihad with us, unless they ended it.

Yeah you can pick and choose from weird translations, but i'd rather you search through the numerous ones I provide a service for.
done. they are still rather incriminating.

Originally posted by dadudemon

If all religions disappeared right now, the world would be a better place.
I sincerely doubt that. The charities that take care of the poor would be abandoned for one.

Originally posted by ~:Mr.Anderson:~
I sincerely doubt that. The charities that take care of the poor would be abandoned for one.

Altruism would not cease to exist.

I think you missed the point of my post, bro.

Originally posted by Symmetric Chaos
The exact same place religion gets them . . .
the fear of something bigger damning them for unselfish acts?

Originally posted by dadudemon
Altruism would not cease to exist.

I think you missed the point of my post, bro.

maybe. I'm not sure. Altruism, of course, would not entirely cease to exist, but undoubtedly christians are the founders of most of the largest charities. Goodwill, salvation army, and red cross were all formed by christians. America also has a large part of its creation thanks to the christian people.

I wonder if any good things would disappear if the muslims ceased to exist, however. I can't think of any.

Originally posted by ~:Mr.Anderson:~
that's not the point. The point is, you said that muslims treated women well before western influence. they didn't exist before western influence.

I meant modern western influence in any case, like the US or USSR.

Originally posted by ~:Mr.Anderson:~
from your source:

oh, heres one saying that a woman who has done something immoral will be locked in her house until she starves to death! isn't that nice?


Or did you miss the part saying to let up if she repents? As in, do that until she apologizes.

Originally posted by ~:Mr.Anderson:~
oh, and heres one (from your source) that describes the way men should take care of women who's ill will YOU HAVE REASON TO FEAR.

It says you should punish them and then NOT harm them. Yeah that is not in any way saying women are objects especially when it says men are to PROTECT women.

Originally posted by ~:Mr.Anderson:~
from this source: http://quranicteachings.co.uk/women.htm
the burkha:

My friend, I don't think you have a right to call me misinformed anymore.

This is what that passage describes (a head scarf). And this is a rather large version at that:

THIS is a Burka:

They are not the same thing at all. Burkas were not invented when Mohammod was around and most muslims agree they are not quranic dress.

Originally posted by ~:Mr.Anderson:~
it is young, very young. sixth century as opposed to 0AD

I didn't realize that the modern form a christianity was around in 0AD given christ was a baby then... I seem to recall the bible being finalized in the 4th century... oh yeah that's because it was. Before then every christian sect had it's own canon of books. As opposed to the Quran which was finalized only a few years after Mohammod's death.

Originally posted by ~:Mr.Anderson:~
The first one was a slip because i was quite tired. The muslim nation is at jiihad with us, unless they ended it.

WTF is "The Muslim Nation"? There is no such authority. BTW I suppose you not knowing what a Burqa is is another slip? You are just full of mistakes.

Originally posted by ~:Mr.Anderson:~
done. they are still rather incriminating.

Not really because you seriously exagerrated what they were saying. At best they're mildly bothersome (I could find far worse stuff in the bible).

This seems pointless, it's really hard rationally debating an obvious cattle car enthusiast.