G.Lantern, Thor vs Superman, Silver Surfer.

Originally posted by D_Dude1210
Energy blasts, rushing and H2H aren't the Surfer's only powers. The fact that he can compensate and beat down BRB once he used his other powers was the point of my post. Please try and keep up.

Stop. Side. Stepping. Answer. Questions. Not. Difficult. You. Can. Do. It.

Just write your answer between the brackets.

What happened when Surfer fired energy blasts?
(WRITE YOUR ANSWER HERE)

What happened when Surfer rushed Bill?
(WRITE YOUR ANSWER HERE)

What happened when Surfer got close?
(WRITE YOUR ANSWER HERE)

Did Surfer Block, avoid, or dodge Bills H2H?
(WRITE YOUR ANSWER HERE)

Originally posted by D_Dude1210

Never said the board did no damage (stop making stuff up). Of course it did damage, ALL of Surfer's blows did damage. It also played the part of stunning BRB long enough for Surfer to finish him off with a 2-shot.

Stop. Think. Stay on topic. Resist urge to dodge. Here is a refresher for you.

Original Point: So unexpected attacks that hit you in the back of the neck, of all places, doesn't make you weakened, disoriented, stunned, shocked, off balance, dizzy, etc., and easier or more susceptible to KO?

Of course not it was the punches.

Originally posted by D_Dude1210
Sigh. This is my take on the fight:
The board opened him up to a 2-shot from the Surfer. BRB's durability was unable to soak the damage dealt from the Surfer's attacks causing him to bleed all over the place. His attacks, however, were shrugged off easily by the Surfer due to the Surfer's durability.

Two things:
1. Sidestep. Stop. Please.
2. Anything that you would care to add? Like, um, stuff that happened before the board, and why he would need to.

Originally posted by D_Dude1210
Sidestepping?? I was answering each of your arguments on an almost one-to-one basis. If you have proof of me sidestepping ANY of your arguments, post your comment and post the reply I made so I can explain to you my meaning (cuz, apparently, most of what I say seems to be over your head).
1) I made you choose between Surfer's punches being powerful (w/c you claim weren't) or BRB's durability being crappy because you keep saying that Surfer's punches were weak because it didn't move BRB all that far and didn't make a "Zwaammm!" sound.
2) Damage is affected by durability and to win a forum fight, you either have to make the other guy forfeit or inflict enough DAMAGE (w/c is, again, affected by durability) to render the opponent unable to fight, thus I proved that damage and durability has a lot of relevance in determining who wins a fight.

If you can't understand a simple:

Was Person 1 throwing powerful punches?

And you respond with random off topic stuff like, 'Person 2's durability' or 'VS forum fights'' or 'Durability is important in a fight', then you're not mentally equipped to be using the internet.

Disconnect your modem.

Originally posted by DarkOdin
I don't have to prove anything anything off-panel is point less like i said repeated to you and now the light bulb in your head goes off and you repeat what i said to you brilliant way of debating

lulz. Go and learn how to read and stop dodging. Im not talking about anything off panel and u want to ignore that and go on about some off panel drivel. Nice strawmanning. its clear that ur trying ur best to sidestep ur burden of proof all of which i have no time for. When u can actually prove the premise on which u base evrything else off (something which is ON PANEL) then u will begin to have a case. For now ur so called argument is laughable.

It all depends, but still Green Lantern is not powerless even without his ring ...

Originally posted by Naija boy
shit

there is no burden of proof. Any panel showing BRB body shows him standing/hovering.

You made the claim that he might be flying on the close up panel to his eyes.

i know your a little slow but i will spell it out for you.

You need to proof it as the panel show him not moving.

So the scan i posted that shows BRB not moving is not proof.

Originally posted by Naija boy
Infact ur whole point is moot because there is no proof that BRB was standing still and not moving while making that sentence since we only see his eyes.

Since your slow here is why you have to prove it making a claim that we don't know what is happening off-panel now move on troll

Originally posted by DarkOdin
there is no burden of proof. Any panel showing BRB body shows him standing/hovering.

You made the claim that he might be flying on the close up panel to his eyes.

i know your a little slow but i will spell it out for you.

You need to proof it as the panel show him not moving.

My God ur an idiot. U dont even know the meaning of the burden of proof. The panels prior to the panel showing his eyes have no bearing on the panel where his eyes were shown u bufoon. That is the panel in question not the other ones. Assuming that he was doing the same thing that he was doing in the previous panel, even though his opponent is no longer in the same position and we do not actually see his other body parts, is inane. I dont need to prove anything. The absence of any of his other body parts in the panel automatically makes the particular action( movement vs standing still) he was performing in that panel ambiguous. That is what i indicated. Ur argument however is dependant on the fact that he WASNT moving and u made that initial claim. Therefore u have to show proof that inthat particular panel he was not moving. U clearly cant.

So the scan i posted that shows BRB not moving is not proof.

Exactly. because the panels in which he wasnt moving arent the ones being discussed.

lulz u cant even keep track of ur own ridiculous arguments.

Originally posted by DarkOdin
Since your slow here is why you have to prove it making a claim that we don't know what is happening off-panel now move on troll

lolwut?

Originally posted by Naija boy
My God ur an idiot. U dont even know the meaning of the burden of proof. The panels prior to the panel showing his eyes have no bearing on the panel where his eyes were shown u bufoon. That is the panel in question not the other ones. Assuming that he was doing the same thing that he was doing in the previous panel, even though his opponent is no longer in the same position and we do not actually see his other body parts, is inane. I dont need to prove anything. The absence of any of his other body parts in the panel automatically makes the particular action( movement vs standing still) he was performing in that panel ambiguous. That is what i indicated. Ur argument however is dependant on the fact that he WASNT moving and u made that initial claim. Therefore u have to show proof that inthat particular panel he was not moving. U clearly cant.

Exactly. because the panels in which he wasnt moving arent the ones being discussed.

lulz u cant even keep track of ur own ridiculous arguments.

It off-panel it doesn't count then i can say SS was knock out cold for ten mins when he landed in the ship. thenyou have to prove me wroung 😆

Originally posted by Naija boy
lolwut?

Well, Skuttlebutt's laser barely affected Thor.

Thor > Surfer > BRB

Originally posted by Naija boy
Infact ur whole point is moot because there is no proof that BRB was standing still and not moving while making that sentence since we only see his eyes.

You make the claims you prove it this was all you buddy.

I stated that BRb had time to follow up on surfer then you came up win this.

Originally posted by Kris Blaze
Well, Skuttlebutt's laser barely affected Thor.

Thor > Surfer > BRB

just run Kris between Naja and dude i think i am going to go crazy.

Originally posted by DarkOdin
😆 i guess i was right on the slow part

No more like ur simply incoherent

Since your slow here is why you have to prove it making a claim that we don't know what is happening off-panel now move on troll

This is statement is gibberish and doesnt convey any meaning. If u had actually put some thought into it u wud have known this before posting it. Though thats probly too much to ask.

Originally posted by Naija boy
No more like ur simply incoherent

so let me know how a person can be incoherent on the internet and i will get back with you on it.

Guys, guys, let's take it down a notch.

Surfer VS BRB can take place somewhere else.

Originally posted by DarkOdin
Originally posted by Naija boy

[B]Infact ur whole point is moot because there is no proof that BRB was standing still and not moving while making that sentence since we only see his eyes.

You make the claims you prove it this was all you buddy.

I stated that BRb had time to follow up on surfer then you came up win this. [/B]

Hmm still refusing to address anything i see. In the post u so foolishly quoted i said that we couldnt determine whether BRB was standing still because we could ONLY see his eyes. Hence it is ambiguous. My argument isnt dependant on his moving or standing still so i dont have to prove anything. My argument is dependant on the fact that we CANT determine whether he is moving or standing still in that panel. The burden of proof is completely on u. But hey, keep up the dodging,strawmanning and posting of emoticons in place of any meaningful argument.

Hopefully ill get another incoherent one sentence response to this post as well.lmao

Originally posted by DarkOdin
so let me know how a person can be incoherent on the internet and i will get back with you on it.

Ah i see,ur incoherent as well as mentally deficient. Well since u asked so nicely ill grant ur request (but please dont get back to me, ive had enough of ur gibberish)

Here the meaning of incoherent
http://www.thefreedictionary.com/incoherence

And now to break it down the message u typed lacked cohesion clarity and organization and conveyed no meaning. therefore can u guess what it was?........................incoherent!. 😱

Originally posted by Naija boy
Ah i see,ur incoherent as well as mentally deficient. Well since u asked so nicely ill grant ur request (but please dont get back to me, ive had enough of ur gibberish)

Here the meaning of incoherent
http://www.thefreedictionary.com/incoherence

And now to break it down the message u typed lacked cohesion clarity and organization and conveyed no meaning. therefore can u guess what it was?........................incoherent!. 😱

Originally posted by Kris Blaze
Guys, guys, let's take it down a notch.

Surfer VS BRB can take place somewhere else.

Your right sorry about that team 1 takes this

Originally posted by DarkOdin
you know incoherence and incoherent 🙄 different meanings too

facepalm 😐

Incoherence-Noun; the condition of being incoherent i.e lack of cohesion or clarity

Incoherent- adjective; lack of cohesion or clarity