Originally posted by xJLxKing
You can't. She feats don't consist of picking up earth, destroying planets, and stuff like that.And Yes, Thor's hammer is the reason why Thor can beat many opponent, and his power is also increased with it
Originally posted by Zeuodin
I've read the comics where Odin and the God Seth busted some long dead and lifeless galaxies. Not an Odin feat. Also it's easy for me to bust up a dry rotted dead piece of wood. I'd break my hand trying that on an alive tree.
😆 what kinda analogy is that? your comparing dead wood and a living tree to a live galaxy and a dead galaxy?
dude, a dead planet is still made of the same minerals when it supported life hence it still retains its original density, structure, composition etc.
a better analogy would be a mountain with a forest. when the forest dies, the mountain is still the same mountain.
Originally posted by gogogadgetgoNot at all the same. Galaxies hold inherent energy if you didn't know. whey they die, they lose the energy. Thus they are easier to destroy. Also the feat was an effect of he and Seth's battle. Misnomer and not at all usable.
😆 what kinda analogy is that? your comparing dead wood and a living tree to a live galaxy and a dead galaxy?dude, a dead planet is still made of the same minerals when it supported life hence it still retains its original density, structure, composition etc.
a better analogy would be a mountain with a forest. when the forest dies, the mountain is still the same mountain.
Originally posted by Zeuodin
Has thor ever fought a super powered martial artist before? Wondy has. Several Times.Has he fought a skilled swordsman on the level of Beauwolf with a sword? Wondy has.
Has Thor used bows and arrows and been proven to be nearly a match for hawkeye as wondy can nearly match artemis and green arrow in marksman ship?
Does Thor use pressure points and block rapid fire incoming attacks? That takes lots of skill.
so what now shall I start listing Thor feats and turn it in a respect thread?
By the way the answer to all the above is yes.
Originally posted by gogogadgetgo
shit, to think i read this ... 🙁
Why "shit"? Is there something you disagree with about it? It makes references to specific events and related information. Or is it just because of length? I've seen longer around here, and short answers tend to only spread ignorance further...
Originally posted by WarlordI've NEVER seen Thor use martial arts in all my years of reading. I've never seen him use a bow an arrow, sword or anything like that. i've never seen him block multiple projectiles with pin point accuracy. twiling his hammer doesn't count. it's just the hammer twirling.
so what now shall I start listing Thor feats and turn it in a respect thread?By the way the answer to all the above is yes.
Originally posted by Zeuodin
I've NEVER seen Thor use martial arts in all my years of reading. I've never seen him use a bow an arrow, sword or anything like that. i've never seen him block multiple projectiles with pin point accuracy. twiling his hammer doesn't count. it's just the hammer twirling.
oriental style MA are not the only type of MA. Wrestling and armed fight are MA too.
bow and arrow are irrelevant. WW has never used a hammer-so what?
The whirling of the hammer might not show accuracy but it shows speed as the narrator states that the speed of the whirling defy characterization and so on
so overall you believe WW is flat out more skilled right?
Originally posted by Warlord
so what now shall I start listing Thor feats and turn it in a respect thread?By the way the answer to all the above is yes.
Missed linking the quote you are responding to, but to show that I, myself, am not biased, I do agree with your response; Thor has fought martial artists, comparable mythic/legendary beings, and by spinning Mjolner can repel rapid fire/incoming attacks (though not a well as Diana can, but that's splitting hairs).
A lot of people underestimate the range of his skills.
Just as a lot of people underestimate Diana's powers, as well...
Originally posted by Warlord
oriental style MA are not the only type of MA. Wrestling and armed fight are MA too.bow and arrow are irrelevant. WW has never used a hammer-so what?
The whirling of the hammer might not show accuracy but it shows speed as the narrator states that the speed of the whirling defy characterization and so on
so overall you believe WW is flat out more skilled right?
Originally posted by Zeuodin
Not at allt he same. Galaxies hold inherent energy if you didn't know. whey they die, they lose the energy. Thus they are easier to destroy. Also the feat was an effect of he and Seth's battle. Misnomer and not at all usable.
inherent what? dude, don't mean to be rude, but that is one stupid argument.
galaxies are composed of multiple solar systems. solar systems are composed of star/s and planets. take away the life from these planets, your left with minerals. these minerals, with life or without life retain the same properties. it'll take the same amount of force to destroy these minerals with or without life.
Thor (both in the comics and in *actual* mythology) is NOT a "skilled" warrior in the sense of finesse and tactical astuteness (THAT aspect, of "skilled fighting and expertise" belongs to Tyr; Thor was the god of brutal assault in combat, the raw power of a warrior, but not the skilled expertise of a "proper" battle tactician). He is still powerful and one of the greatest warriors in myth/comics, but in a manner very different from that of a martial-artist, or trained combat wrestler...
That's why I think he and Diana make such a good combat debate -- their approach to fighting is very different, but equally effective in their own way...
Originally posted by gogogadgetgoYour argument is weak. A long dead Galaxy would mean no Stars. No energy. It is much easier to crumble a barren rock than one teaming with life, plant life, and heat. The mass is even affected. The feat was also shared.
inherent what? dude, don't mean to be rude, but that is one stupid argument.galaxies are composed of multiple solar systems. solar systems are composed of star/s and planets. take away the life from these planets, your left with minerals. these minerals, with life or without life retain the same properties. it'll take the same amount of force to destroy these minerals with or without life.