Originally posted by Advent
Ineffectual, can you support that at all? Hint: No. Bastila Shan, who's willpower topples nigh everyone of her era, was shown to be frozen for the several minutes it takes to duel Malak and unlock the door.
Ineffectual because Malak has several seconds (more than enough time to swing a saber) yet he chooses not to, your basically calling it PIS.
Originally posted by Advent
Afterwards, at 7:57, Revan is put in a stasis until at least 8:20+. If you notice, Malak charges Bastila while Revan is still stuck in a stasis, completely vulnerable with no way of defending himself.
You're calling it PIS? Because Revan was "helpless" for a quite a while before Bastila ever shows up. You're saying Malak was operating on CIS and PIS, a weak argument. Like the people who argue Maul "would've killed Obi Wan" forgetting that it was as much a display of skill and power from Obi Wan as much as it was a momentary lapse from Maul.
Malak had a 10+ second lapse according to you, if your theory is true. Which means it's CIS or simply PIS to you, which somewhat diminishes Revan's eventual victory.
Originally posted by Advent
Malak could have very easily killed Revan, Bastila, or Carth. If it weren't for Bastila, Revan would have died. It is an extremely potent attack.
He could've? Why didn't he? This is the guy who was deathly afraid of Revan, no reason why he wouldn't have killed him in the time he had, unless he thought that force stasis wasn't going to get him anywhere. Even before Bastila shows up he has the time.
Originally posted by Advent
Yes, Carth Onasi would know. Bastila knew. Revan knew. And Malak himself knew it.
Addressed above, I don't think it even classifies as CIS, knowing Malak's fear of Revan.