The 300 million gigawatts figure was for the light turbolasers whereas the 2.4 million megatons figure was for the heavy turbolasers figure. Why did they use different units? IDK, but it's still canon, and you're still dodging the point.
Proof?...And not from stardestroyer.net...I want proper evidence because you were adamant the old figure was the heavy guns before.
Maybe, but they still could have attacked from much farther away. Also, starships from Star Trek tend to miss other large sharships, so it isn't accurate to say that they'd be able to hit smaller and faster Star Wars starfighters, especially since the former aren't prepared for that.
The Jem Hadar ships were as small and agile as starfighters. You also seem to have forgotten a major point regarding this thread (as had I until earlier today)...Battlestar Galactica/Cylons also have a large number of fighters.
I said a neutron star. Read the post.
Apologies...But it also makes your point even weaker because a black hole has far more destructive power than a neutron star.
I don't think you understand the technology difference. Star Wars vs Star Trek is like the USA vs Imperial Britain.
I don't understand the difference?...really?....REALLY REALLY?...You're the one who has completely forgotten and disregards the following
Iconian Gateway...
Dyson's sphere
multi kinetic neutronic mine
Dreadnought intelligent WMD
Krenim time ship
Perfect cloaking technology
Planetary cloaks
Magnetometric guided charges
Shield draining weapons
Ability to fire weapons at warp
transwarp
planet destroying single man ships
Chroniton torpedoes
Polaron Torpedoes
Quantum torpedoes
Transphasic torpedoes
Isokinetic cannon
Faulty logic. The sun crusher is a single starfighter sized ship, and it can destroy a star system. Using your own logic against you, Star Wars has the superior firepower.
A MKNM is smaller than a sun crusher and can destroy an areas hundreds of thousands of times as big.
2.4 million megatons vs 1160 megatons
Why are you still giving (faulty) figures...Especially for that of a photon torpedo as if it's representative of the power of the ST galaxy. I've clearly shown weapons that are massively more powerful than anything star wars has yet every time I do you answer with a wrong figure for a photon torpedo (a weapon which I haven't even discussed because I know it's not powerful compared with other ST weapons)
Actually, Star Wars has black hole creating weapons that they can launch from a distance.
I love it when you make a claim but don't even name the weapon or show any evidence for it.
I already covered this.
Yeah...Your faulty "the shields will stop it" argument and your even more ridiculous "it erased itself from existence so it doesn't count" argument...Both of which are total nonsense.
Exactly. You do realize that there are more sentient species in Star Wars than the borg have ever assimilated, right? It took the borg what; thousands of years to assimilate hundreds of thousands of species, and yet you're claiming that they can assimilate millions of species united and far more advanced that any they've ever encountered in a matter of years (or however long the war would last)?
How are tuscan raiders or jawas or ewoks or any of these huge number or generally useless species more advanced than, for example, Guinan's species. You realise it was hinted that Guinan could actually defend herself against Q yet the Borg all but destroyed her species.
The only argument you've got to keep you hundreds of quadrillions of citizens is that the Borg would deem most of them unworthy of assimilation?
By that logic, Star Wars uses nanotechnology to wtf pwn Star Trek cause nanotechnology sounds cool.
This is where you're supposed to give examples of SW nanotech has done that matches being able to assimilate biological and technological species/tech within a few minutes.
In fact, since the borg seem to have similar DNA due to their constant assimilating, Star Wars could use a nanovirus (which they have used) to kill all of the borg.
This is where you have to prove that the borg all have similar DNA...Odd you would claim that given that they're made up of hundreds of thousands of different species.
Those were targeted at infantry, not starships, and thus wouldn't be at full power.
Will you ever stop making bullshit excuses up on the spot?
No you haven't. Jedi in Stealth X's would be untraceable to sensors even when they fire their shadow bombs, because the bombs are activated by the Jedi using the Force. These shadow bombs can cripple 70 trillion gigawatt shields in a few attack runs, so logic would dictate that they could easily cripple shields that get crippled by a few 1160 megaton weapons.
They're proton torpedoes guided by the force...
And where are you getting this 70 trillion gigawatt shield info from?
What ship was it?
Proof please.
There are spaceports in almost every major Star Wars planet, even remote ones, and it is stated multiple times that there is a lot of traffic and lots of civilians docking. A ship in Star Wars actually isn't that expensive, costing about 50,000 credits. Luke, who despite being famous isn't really rich, apparently not having a salary, has a large and powerful ship, the Jade Shadow. Space traffic is shown often. Basically, it's about as common as we today own cars.
That's not proof...That's nonsensical conjecture...Figures...Not nonsense.
Exactly. A watt is derived from 1 joule per second. 200 trillion gigawatts vs 15 billion gigawatts. Both use gigawatts; one is not "total" (what do you mean by "total" gigawatts), both are joules per second.
No they're not joules per second...A watt is only equivalent to joules per second...You don't have to express watts in reference to time...If you say a generator gives out a certain amount of power in watts then that's the total wattage that generator can give out either in it's life time or until it's fuel runs out...Which is what the SW ship is stated in because it has no time unit attached. The ST figure IS given with a time indicator rather than it's total output. I showed the calculations on here quite a few pages ago.
I'm not sure about the Thrawn figure, but I'm pretty sure that by "on screen" you mean using some vague quote that Han Solo made when they were at the remains of Alderaan, right?
Well I am sure about the Thrawn figure because I own and have read the novels several times. And yes...I am referring to when Han (who's business relies on him knowing the strength and whereabouts of the empire's fleet) stated that there wasn't a weapon capable of destroying a planet and that it would take "1000 star destroyers with more firepower than is possible" (paraphrased)
The security in Coruscant was stated to be able to identify people in a planet of trillions by tracking how they walk.
An old ST ship can do that from orbit.
Jedi piloting Stealth X's can detonate the shadow bombs using the Force. It is specifically stated in several novels that this prevents sensors from tracking the Stealth X's when they fire. They were called the stealthiest things in the Galaxy.
Yet the wookipedia entry says they give their position away when firing weapons or sending out transmissions...
There are 100 quadrillion citizens in Star Wars. It is considered in Star Wars to be normal to have a ship. Even if only one in a million had a ship that would still be 100 billion ships, most more powerful than the Enterprise D.
So you make up these ships in your mind and then state that these made up ships are more powerful than the enterprise?...What kind of ****ed up logic is that?
Speculation.
haha...see above.
And Luke Skywalker is a person and was capable of resisting the pull of a supermassive black hole.
Context?
No, it would not, because solar systems are light years apart, and inhabited solar systems in Star Wars are even more light years apart.
Just because our solar system is light years from another star doesn't mean that all are...Look at Tatooine....It's a binary system.
You also realise your argument means that you're admitting there is less star systems and therefor less planets in SW than ST because both galaxies are approx 120,000 across.
Really? Because Centerpoint station and the other things you mentioned did indeed exist in Star Wars in universe history, yet the krenim timeship erased itself from history so that it never existed at all.
Was it seen on screen?...Yes...Therefor can it be used in this debate...Yes...So stop talking utter ****ing bollocks.
Except that none of these would affect an AT-AT.
Yeah...A weapon that can devastate a world through tectonic displacement can't damage an AT-AT that was brought down by a piece of cable...Ok.
Lets look at some of the other forms of SW ground weapons...The AT-ST...Blew to pieces when hit with a couple of logs.