Superman's Hardest Punch vs Thor's Hardest Mjolnir Slam

Originally posted by Rage.Of.Olympus
If Thor can charge his hammer with energy, he hits harder.

I think he meant that the energized hit is harder than a non energized hit.

Originally posted by Diesldude
I think he meant that the energized hit is harder than a non energized hit.

I don't know, but if that's the case then he is admitting that superman hits harder than Thor with the hammer as long as it isn't charged.
Oh well I'd like to hear his reasoning though.

Thor's hammer hits harder.

Originally posted by TheGodKiller
Just another ignorant fanboy spouting nonsense by mixing up things here and there from canon and non-canon sources, and adding a bit of his own fanfic to it.

Originally posted by TheGodKiller
He's used to mostly posting random sh1t on the OFT, and most of his posts on the GDF don't make any sense either. He's averse to reading forum rules from the looks of it.

😐

You won't find any of THAT crap on KMC!

😆

Superman can hit harder. However, I'm sure Thor can charge his hammer that adds all kinds of other effects to the raw damage.

Originally posted by Silent Master
Since you're adding stips, what if the person being hit absorbs kinetic energy, wouldn't that make Thor's charged strikes millions of times more damaging than Superman punches, seeing as the strikes would contain more than just kinetic energy?

Originally posted by h1a8
charging the hammer wouldn't make him STRIKE HARDER.

Originally posted by h1a8
Depends on who's it hitting. I don't see the charge doing much (if anything) to a being that absorbs energy naturally or resistant to energy (especially lightning).

Not sure if serious.

Also, lol. Thor's done more damage to Galactus with charged strikes, the personification of energy absorption/consumption. What an unrealistic circumstance.

Originally posted by h1a8
Correct. But I'm taking the OP to mean who strikes harder. Who can do more damage depends on what is being struck and thus unanswerable.

It's only "unanswerable" because you don't want to admit that a charged hammer shot is more powerful than uncharged hammer shot.

BTW, still waiting for you to post scans in this thread
http://www.killermovies.com/forums/showthread.php?threadid=577594&pagenumber=7#post14267208

Originally posted by Rage.Of.Olympus
Not sure if serious.

Also, lol. Thor's done more damage to Galactus with charged strikes, the personification of energy absorption/consumption. What an unrealistic circumstance.

You should see some of the things "A being" has done.

😂

Thor wins, no contest.

Originally posted by Sabro
Thor wins, no contest.

Of course it's a contest.

Originally posted by Rage.Of.Olympus
Not sure if serious.

Also, lol. Thor's done more damage to Galactus with charged strikes, the personification of energy absorption/consumption. What an unrealistic circumstance.

I'm sure it was the Uru that did the damage to Galactus and not the charge. How do I know? I don't but neither do you. No one can prove how much did the charge actually affect Galactus.

I was referring to beings who's main power is absorbing energy (including attack energy) on contact without trying. Galactus doesn't absorb attack energy on contact without trying (look at his history). Thanos blasting him is a prime example.

But again, more damage doesn't mean strike harder. I'm arguing who strikes harder and not who can do more damage (since damage depends on what is hit).

This thread is about which is more powerful, not which "strikes harder".

Originally posted by Silent Master
This thread is about which is more powerful, not which "strikes harder".

Join the rest of the world for once.

Originally posted by Dampyre
Thor's hammer hits harder.

Indeed, just ask Sif.

Originally posted by h1a8
Yet everyone and their mama has being arguing which one strikes harder for over 3 years now. Duh

Join the rest of the world for once.

No, they're arguing which does more damage.

Originally posted by h1a8
I'm sure it was the Uru that did the damage to Galactus and not the charge. How do I know? I don't but neither do you. No one can prove how much did the charge actually affect Galactus.

I was referring to beings who's main power is absorbing energy (including attack energy) on contact without trying. Galactus doesn't absorb attack energy on contact without trying (look at his history). Thanos blasting him is a prime example.

But again, more damage doesn't mean strike harder. I'm arguing who strikes harder and not who can do more damage (since damage depends on what is hit).

No, I can't tell you how much percentage of the damage came from the charging but it is clear that charging Mjolnir has always allowed him to strike with greater power.

You're a moron, charging Mjolnir with energy specifically augments it's might (How much depends on the writer and the amount of energy put in). Off the top of my head, here's a scene:
http://s38.photobucket.com/user/RageOfTheGod/media/Thor/ThorvsSurtur3.jpg.html

Do you believe the writer didn't intend to have Mjolnir hit with significantly greater power? Thor specifically attributes the potency of his hammer to the energy it's generating.

I'd like to see such a being.

Christ, what a silly and irrelevant distinction. The only time a strike from a charged hammer blow would do less damage due to its nature against an opponent would be in such specific, extenuating circumstances, that they have absolutely not reflection on how things would normally go. Not to mention it's never happened, like ever.