Originally posted by abhilegend
Yeah, your thinking is so relevant it overrules what's written in the comic./sarcasm
That literally makes no sense whatsoever. Try harder Abhi.
Originally posted by abhilegend
Unfortunately thorbaggery induces stupidity and its incurable too despite mindset's efforts.
lol. Well now it's more than obvious that this was never intended to be personal.
Originally posted by abhilegend
Yeah, go on about how Thor meant something else when he said explicitly how he called upon the power of odin to defeat galactus. Unfortunately thorbaggery induces stupidity and its incurable too despite mindset's efforts.Yeah, I checked its release date and you're right. It was released in November 1989, doesn't changes anything though.
Thor said the power of Odin. I'm assuming he's referring to the attack he used against Galactus. You're arguing that what we saw wasn't what happened at all. I think my stance is more logical and requires a lot less off panel speculation. Sorry mate, but dumb opinions are invalid.
Nope. That comic had the "final say" so as it stands, Thor did use the God Blast against Galactus. The retcon was retconned. 🙂
Originally posted by abhilegend
Thor saying "In the Odin's name" means he was channeling Odin's power is one of the stupidest thing I've ever heard. In Thor 161 he was explicitly channeling his life-force, in the retcon he explitly states he only defeated galactus by calling upon the power of Odin. I don't know why its so hard to grasp.
Again its more akin to praying when he said Odin's name in Thor#161.Kinda like when Wonder Woman often mentions "Hera give me strength" when she's doing a strength feat.So Thor mentioning the power of Odin to defeat Galactus is just him being humble in the scan you posted.Instead of just giving credit to himself, he also gives credit to Odin on why he beat Galactus.
Again, its not much of a retcon.Just you misinterpreting said scan.
Originally posted by Igniz
Again its more akin to praying when he said Odin's name in Thor#161.Kinda like when Wonder Woman often mentions "Hera give me strength" when she's doing a strength feat.So Thor mentioning the power of Odin to defeat Galactus is just him being humble in the scan you posted.Instead of just giving credit to himself, he also gives credit to Odin on why he beat Galactus.
👆
Originally posted by Damborgson
That literally makes no sense whatsoever. Try harder Abhi.lol. Well now it's more than obvious that this was never intended to be personal.
Don't take it too seriously, I was just responding to rage in the language he actually understands.
Originally posted by Rage.Of.Olympus
Thor said the power of Odin. I'm assuming he's referring to the attack he used against Galactus. You're arguing that what we saw wasn't what happened at all. I think my stance is more logical and requires a lot less off panel speculation. Sorry mate, but dumb opinions are invalid.Nope. That comic had the "final say" so as it stands, Thor did use the God Blast against Galactus. The retcon was retconned. 🙂
That's not much of a re-retcon, thor was just boasting.
uhuh
Originally posted by abhilegend
😂Don't take it too seriously, I was just responding to rage in the language he actually understands.
Yeah, who is speculating now? Thor says in no uncertain terms that he defeated galactus by calling upon the power of odin, not that "I called upon power of odin and mixed and shaked it up by mu own power" and fired it upon galactus.That's not much of a re-retcon, thor was just boasting.
uhuh
Shut up. No you weren't. You're just a butthurt, incurable dumb hater who likes to tickle my bum. This close away from a ban.
You don't understand. I'm saying that Thor performed an energy blast, and it was simply powered by Odin (If you assume it was a retcon that is, could clearly be interpreted as what Damborg was saying). If we assume anything else, it will just be complete speculation.
This went up from another pointless off-topic derail to the 10th level of retard very quickly. This post:
Originally posted by TheGodKiller
Well, seeing how the Odinforce used to be desribed as the very lifeblood of all Asgard during those times, and how Mimir explained that Odin gave all Asgardians their life-force, technically speaking it would be a portion of Odin's power.
In light of the way Odinpower was treated during that era(and probably still is now) the notion of a definite retcon surrounding what Thor did to Galactus has to be one of the most desperate attempts to downscale/degrade a feat I have ever read on this forum.
Oh, common V, are you trying to appeal to popularity, when you have factual evidence that one attack can make a hole in reality and the other can seal it?
Somehow a wielding tool does not have enough power to seal a crack in metal, just because there was another wielding tool on the other side sealing the same crack. That is genious, somehow the wielding tools cannot seal a crack in metal individually, just because they did it at the same time???
Like i said, appealing to popularity, does not change the evidence, that both attacks could rip or seal a hole in reality.
SOme people clearly have no clue about Juggs... Juggs has been written without a shield or even being able to call upon one. So this notion that with the shield he's so much more uber than without is without basis. Juggs has just as good durability feats without the shield than with. True, there are a tad more low showings without than with, but higher showings are about the same.
Originally posted by KuRuPT Thanosi
SOme people clearly have no clue about Juggs... Juggs has been written without a shield or even being able to call upon one. So this notion that with the shield he's so much more uber than without is without basis. Juggs has just as good durability feats without the shield than with. True, there are a tad more low showings without than with, but higher showings are about the same.
Do you just thrive on being proven wrong or something? Lol, I'm sorry but Juggernaut is clearly far more durable with his force field. The fact that you'd contest that is clear evidence that you don't know what you're talking about.
Going back all the way to his original days, Juggernaut's invulnerability was attributed to his shield. Without it, he's been hurt plenty of times. Almost every-time he appears without it, or close to it. Some are just plain embarrassing and others he takes about as well as you'd expect a Top Tier too. With it? He just walks through everything.
Originally posted by Rao Kal ElYou were the one who overconfidently declared that "the OP got his answer" over the course of this thread. Now all of a sudden the overwhelming response the OP received is irrelevant? Classic quaneuver. Godblast held up the sagging Marvel Mutiverse structure. I don't know why you've ignored that for six months now in favor of holding onto shared feats and juvenile virgin insults like they were security blankets.
Oh, common V, are you trying to appeal to popularity, when you have factual evidence that one attack can make a hole in reality and the other can seal it?
But, given that the mods are letting it go, why would you stop? This single topic has obviously subsumed your mind for the past six months, after all.
Originally posted by Rao Kal ElIs this in response to somebody else's post? This makes no sense. Cows eat hay and chew. This is about as relevant as what you typed.
Somehow a wielding tool does not have enough power to seal a crack in metal, just because there was another wielding tool on the other side sealing the same crack. That is genious, somehow the wielding tools cannot seal a crack in metal individually, just because they did it at the same time???
Originally posted by Rao Kal ElNo you're right, common sense amongst people doesn't change the evidence that your Superman/Orion shared feat is still vastly overshadowed by Thor's shared godblast feat of literally supporting the Marvel Multiverse from collapsing.
Like i said, appealing to popularity, does not change the evidence, that both attacks could rip or seal a hole in reality.
Also... is it March already? You take 45 days (on average) trying to draft responses like clockwork. Looks like I need to reset my calendar.
Originally posted by KuRuPT Thanosi
SOme people clearly have no clue about Juggs... Juggs has been written without a shield or even being able to call upon one. So this notion that with the shield he's so much more uber than without is without basis. Juggs has just as good durability feats without the shield than with. True, there are a tad more low showings without than with, but higher showings are about the same.
...
This is the difference between having shields and not having them:
then...
how you came to the conclusion that having impenetrable shields somehow still puts juggernaut at the same level of durability is...hard to see anyway.
Originally posted by abhilegend
Don't take it too seriously, I was just responding to rage in the language he actually understands.
Yeah, no. But whatever.
Originally posted by ODG
You were the one who overconfidently declared that "the OP got his answer" over the course of this thread. Now all of a sudden the overwhelming response the OP received is irrelevant? Classic quaneuver. Godblast held up the sagging Marvel Mutiverse structure. I don't know why you've ignored that for six months now in favor of holding onto shared feats and juvenile virgin insults like they were security blankets.But, given that the mods are letting it go, why would you stop? This single topic has obviously subsumed your mind for the past six months, after all. Is this in response to somebody else's post? This makes no sense. Cows eat hay and chew. This is about as relevant as what you typed. No you're right, common sense amongst people doesn't change the evidence that your Superman/Orion shared feat is still vastly overshadowed by Thor's shared godblast feat of literally supporting the Marvel Multiverse from collapsing.
Also... is it March already? You take 45 days (on average) trying to draft responses like clockwork. Looks like I need to reset my calendar.
Who is the guy in your sig?