Originally posted by SpireOk, but you have fifteen minutes and responded well before the time limit was up. It was just another flame anyways.
Well you already replied and I was jumping back between surfer darkseid...
Ok, let me ask you a question. If Superman is a 100 in strength what would you rate Thor in terms of strength by number?
Originally posted by quanchi112
Ok, but you have fifteen minutes and responded well before the time limit was up. It was just another flame anyways.Ok, let me ask you a question. If Superman is a 100 in strength what would you rate Thor in terms of strength by number?
I'm aware.
It wasn't a flame.
You still need to address it.
Originally posted by quanchi112
What did I say that wasn't true?Then I'll respond and you can. Be brave.
Originally posted by quanchi112
Next time don't be foolish enough to use feats a character only accomplished with help.
When did I do that? Hint: I didn't.
I even told Rage I didn't care about it when he brought it up here:
Originally posted by Rage.Of.Olympus
Do I think he did? Why not it's a comic. Just like I think Superman lifted a book of infinite pages.Do I think either of them can lift that much on average, unless the plot demands it and that they both have infinite strength? Hell no. That's just stupid even by comic standards.
My point was that, if he actually believes that Superman did lift that book and it was infinite, then go on and state that the Thor incident was hyperbole and should not count in the same breath, then his just plain hypocritical.
You can't accept one but ignore the other.
Originally posted by Spire
I don't care about any of that, as context obviously separates the two feats.I was just asking about the Thor feat.
What makes you think he was resisting infinite weight?
Originally posted by SpireI am saying you saying one feat is perfectly acceptable while the other is not is ignoring the context of the said feat. Thor did his feat on his own while Superman didn't.
Lol.What does that have to do with you said I used/brought up Superman feats when I didn't?
So now you have 2 things to address.
Originally posted by quanchi112
I am saying you saying one feat is perfectly acceptable while the other is not is ignoring the context of the said feat. Thor did his feat on his own while Superman didn't.
And I'm saying that you saying that I brought up/used Superman feats is wrong.
Also, if you had actually read the thread and had taken time to think about what was being stated you would understand that the Superman feat has NOTHING to do with the Thor at all.
Originally posted by quanchi112
He doesn't answer questions he just reposts himself and engages you in a circular debate. Never seen a guy quote himself more.
Funny seeing as how you refuse to answer questions and pretend that your bullshit just.... goes away if you talk about something else or dodge a point with derailments and distractions.
For example, right now in an attempt to salvage your position after you called me biased, you dodged and brought up Superman feats and said that I brought them up.
Originally posted by SpireI am saying you disregarding a thor feat while acting as if superman's feat is valid is laughable and biased.
And I'm saying that you saying that I brought up/used Superman feats is wrong.Also, if you had actually read the thread and had taken time to think about what was being stated you would understand that the Superman feat has NOTHING to do with the Thor at all.
Originally posted by SpireRespond in one post. It's like you just want to increase your post count. Earlier you responded twice to one post of mine. LOL.
Funny seeing as how you refuse to answer questions and pretend that your bullshit just.... goes away if you talk about something else or dodge a point with derailments and distractions.For example, right now in an attempt to salvage your position after you called me biased, you dodged and brought up Superman feats and said that I brought them up.
Bringing them up is immaterial the point is dismissing Thor's feat and acting as if Superman's is all fine and dandy is being biased. "Hey, Marvel help me lift this up."
Spire's reaction,"Superman lifted infinite weight on his own. He is the strongest one there is."
Originally posted by ZeuodinIyo. What have I dodged?
Um, that would be you.
Originally posted by quanchi112
I am saying you disregarding a thor feat while acting as if superman's feat is valid is laughable and biased.
It's not. At all. The Superman feat has nothing to do with the Thor feat. It's just an attempt to derail the point: Thor's feat.
Originally posted by quanchi112
Bringing them up is immaterial the point is dismissing Thor's feat and acting as if Superman's is all fine and dandy is being biased. "Hey, Marvel help me lift this up."
Retardation. Derailment.
Also, you still need to show me where it was that I brought up/used Superman's feats.