Originally posted by Spire`
It's not. At all. The Superman feat has nothing to do with the Thor feat. It's just an attempt to derail the point: Thor's feat.Retardation. Derailment.
Also, you still need to show me where it was that I brought up/used Superman's feats.
Honestly, don't let him nor carver troll you. Ignore them, it's not a discussion anymore, they just try to annoy you. 😉
Originally posted by Zeuodin
Execpt the in the Supermanfeat, the bleed ground was cracking beneath them. We dont' know what the ground was made of, but i obvious moving the book from it's suspended place was dangerous. Thor's ground wasn' sinking. Also the fact that an infinite memory thingy had to be used so the book could be read let's us know it had infinite pages.
What? What's your point here? First of all, we don't know what the ground Thor was on was made off either. They were on a planet in space that they came by when Thor was on his quest searching for Odin.
It was an unknown planet, and we don't know what the ground was composed off either.
And the ground on the planet was sinking to an extent.
Originally posted by Spire
No my stance is an object having infinite weight will be pulled under the ground. In other words, what was stated in the book. That was the whole point of multiplying one's mass.The point of focus is the ground, not Thor, or Bob, or Frank, or a chair, a car, a cup, a shoe, a pencil, a Thor fan in denial.
Also, let's completely ignore the word 'moment' which was used twice.
Very, very simple to understand. Seriously.
That should how it would work in real life, which was stated in the book that because their weight was multiplied too such a degree they were being pulled under the ground. Everyone except Thor was almost completely under.
What do you mean moment?
Originally posted by Juntai
Your stance is funny. . . . OK, I'll agree. . he was his peer because he hit Superman. . . . until Superman stopped his ending blow, overpowering him from a position with less leverage, made him go bug eyed and call him mightier than anyone in the nine worlds, and then knocked him out. Even to where he was still contemplating it issues later.
And then at the end of the story, when Thor realized he wasn't the man for the job, because it was a job for. . .
Because if Thor was Superman's peer, he would have cut swathe through the villains and smashed open the barrier.
He isn't a peer just because he hit Superman. His a peer because he rocked his world, knocked him on his ass twice and was going toe to toe with Superman. And the fact Thor apparently one shotted Doomsday in the same arc along with Solomon Grundy, and was taking on beings like Amazo and Despero on his own.
After Thor waded through a blast of heat vision, which clearly affected him to a degree in that issues context. We'll that is true if we ignore beings like Odin. Contemplating it? Aquaman brought it up. And Superman brought up the instance later as well. He himself stated that he beat Thor, but just barely. Simply based on that you can come to the conclusion that Thor and Superman are peers for the most part.
It was pretty clear to me that in that arc they intended them to be physical rivals with them being so close something as heat vision can give Superman the edge to put down Thor.
😆
Ignore the fact that Thor was taking on Amazo, Despero, and other multiple villains alone while fighting like a brick for god sakes. If that doesn't show that Thor was meant to be a physical peer and rival of Superman in that crossover then I don't know what will.
Thor was busy taking on multiple villains and saw that Superman could not breach the barrier hence he lent him Mjolnir to give him the power necessary to do what needed to be done as he lacked it.
Originally posted by SpireBoth feats don't prove anything really. To just focus and try to take down Thor a peg is really showing a huge level of bias in you. It's quite apparent you want to apply a double standard in virtually every thread which concerns Thor and Superman.
It's not. At all. The Superman feat has nothing to do with the Thor feat. It's just an attempt to derail the point: Thor's feat.Retardation. Derailment.
Also, you still need to show me where it was that I brought up/used Superman's feats.
The point is you wanted to focus on Thor's feats when I stated neither feat proved necessarily anything. Please try and keep up.
Originally posted by quanchi112
Both feats don't prove anything really. To just focus and try to take down Thor a peg is really showing a huge level of bias in you. It's quite apparent you want to apply a double standard in virtually every thread which concerns Thor and Superman.The point is you wanted to focus on Thor's feats when I stated neither feat proved necessarily anything. Please try and keep up.
Retardation. Not only as a response, but in bringing the topic back up and reminding everyone.
Also, I'm not putting up with your bullshit and your pathetic tactics anymore, it takes too long and it's the holidays. Show me where it was that I brought up/used Superman feats, or it's concession and you can GTFO.
Originally posted by SpireFlaming. It's what weak minded individuals who repeat themselves over and over fall back on. It's something I expect you can't even refrain from doing at this point.
Retardation. Not only as a response, but in bringing the topic back up and reminding everyone.Also, I'm not putting up with your bullshit and your pathetic tactics anymore, it takes too long and it's the holidays. Show me where it was that I brought up/used Superman feats, or it's concession and you can GTFO.
I never stated you did I said both feats really don't prove anything and you continued on your anti Thor crusade. Not on my watch, sir.
Originally posted by quanchi112
Flaming. It's what weak minded individuals who repeat themselves over and over fall back on. It's something I expect you can't even refrain from doing at this point.I never stated you did I said both feats really don't prove anything and you continued on your anti Thor crusade. Not on my watch, sir.
Originally posted by quanchi112
You are using shared feats as proof of Superman's strength.
Originally posted by quanchi112
Next time don't be foolish enough to use feats a character only accomplished with help.
Concession accepted.
Originally posted by quanchi112
What exactly have I lied about? You go back and forth with me so don't act like I just keep responding to myself and you are completely innocent in this manner. I don't get bitter here that often.
👆 Concession on the trolling part.
Originally posted by quanchi112
I never stated you did I said both feats really don't prove anything and you continued on your anti Thor crusade. Not on my watch, sir. [/B]
Originally posted by quanchi112
You are using shared feats as proof of Superman's strength.
Originally posted by quanchi112
Next time don't be foolish enough to use feats a character only accomplished with help.
Originally posted by quanchi112
You really think you of all people can ge inside my head. Hahaha. Try harder. Don't you dare ever try to downplay Thor again.
Says the liar who bumps up old threads from from two weeks ago so you can respond to me. Don't you ever try to downplay your lying and trolling again.
Originally posted by SpireI didn't just respond to you I responded to other arguments I haven't been able to respond back to. It's what I have always done. You are some new guy around here.
Says the liar who bumps up old threads from from two weeks ago so you can respond to me. Don't you ever try to downplay your lying and trolling again.
Originally posted by quanchi112
I didn't just respond to you I responded to other arguments I haven't been able to respond back to. It's what I have always done. You are some new guy around here.
So in other words, you responded to my post two weeks later, as a personal choice. However, I'm not in your mind.