Ninjitsu vs Kung fu

Originally posted by FrothByte
wow, really brave of you.

Originally posted by iceman24567
🤨 shut up

😮‍💨 i was never talking i am just typing

Originally posted by Face Inc.
Back on topic . Jujitsu for the win. 😛

jujitsu is an overated crap that bought the fat and lazy UFC fans that sit there ass at home and think BJJ is god himself

Originally posted by valtiz
😮‍💨 i was never talking i am just typing

Originally posted by valtiz
jujitsu is an overated crap that bought the fat and lazy UFC fans that sit there ass at home and think BJJ is god himself

Originally posted by iceman24567
Well your fingers need to be smashed by hammers made of jagged rocks 😮‍💨

you cant do it because i practice the iron fingers style biatch 😮‍💨

Originally posted by iceman24567
Jujitsu is one of the most fluid arts out there top of the food chain wtf are smoking?

😆 seriously stop

when will people realize that there isnt such thing as the best form of fighting its all about the fighter ... but people today are too braiwashed they are walking like zombies saying "muay thai and bjj" "muay thai and bjj" i guess that why gracie lost so much against wrestlers and sambo fighters 🙄

Originally posted by valtiz
😆 seriously stop

Originally posted by iceman24567
You claim to know something about martial arts but you don't 😆 . Laugh at the many samurai during the feudal ages that were flipping armored dudes around then neutralizing them in seconds 😆 yeah funny 😐

wtf does any of this have to do with bjj?

Originally posted by valtiz
wtf does any of this have to do with bjj?

Originally posted by iceman24567
the many samurai during the feudal ages that were flipping armored dudes around then neutralizing them in seconds 😐

first of all it got nothing to do with bjj, second of all if something then fighting many people is more effective with more of a stand up fighting like boxing and muay thai because bjj isnt effective at all against more then 1 opponent, samurai fighters back then used aikido and basic bone breaking methods that were in ninjitsu thats all but if they tried to grapple in the middle of a sword fight with someone they would lose there arms and legs because grappling is the dumbest thing to do when fighting someone with a cold weapon or more then 1 person

Originally posted by iceman24567
He said he liked Jujitsu then you started ragging on Jujitsu. Jujitsu >>> Brazilian JiuJitsu

oh then my mistake i thought he was talking about brazilian jiu jitsu for some reason 😂

Originally posted by valtiz
first of all it got nothing to do with bjj, second of all if something then fighting many people is more effective with more of a stand up fighting like boxing and muay thai because bjj isnt effective at all against more then 1 opponent, samurai fighters back then used aikido and basic bone breaking methods that were in ninjitsu thats all but if they tried to grapple in the middle of a sword fight with someone they would lose there arms and legs because grappling is the dumbest thing to do when fighting someone with a cold weapon or more then 1 person

Originally posted by iceman24567
You have no clue what you are talking about a samurai would kick your ass 😆

actually i do have a clue what i am talking about and a samurai without his sword wouldnt be too much to handle since they knew back then aikido and basic bone breaking moves they didnt have any solid defence or a formed technique of fighting they relayed on the sword and once they lost it.... they could only beat some "kung fu drunkie" but not a solid fighter

Originally posted by valtiz
actually i do have a clue what i am talking about and a samurai without his sword wouldnt be too much to handle since they knew back then aikido and basic bone breaking moves they didnt have any solid defence or a formed technique of fighting they relayed on the sword and once they lost it.... they could only beat some "kung fu drunkie" but not a solid fighter

its you who doesnt know crap and think samurai back then were some kind of dragon ball z fighters flipping beating anyone around them, a samurai could do it back then to foriegen soldiers who didnt knew any fighting but putting a samurai against someone today who train in martial arts? a 16 year old could beat a samurai

Originally posted by valtiz
its you who doesnt know crap and think samurai back then were some kind of dragon ball z fighters flipping beating anyone around them, a samurai could do it back then to foriegen soldiers who didnt knew any fighting but putting a samurai against someone today who train in martial arts? a 16 year old could beat a samurai

😬

Originally posted by iceman24567
Aikido is a defensive style 😬.

and again you show that you know nothing you just embarrass yourself, aikido got nothing to do with defence its channelling and using your enemy movement and energy against him but its not defence at all, now me and anyone who knows something about martial arts can understand you dont know anything you just argue because you like it

Well if the style focuses on counters, controlling the oppenent without causing harm, and is considered to be "harmonious", I think that qualifies as a defensive style.