YouTube video
Originally posted by Wei Phoenix
Elaborate.
Superman is stronger, faster, more powerful (which is an understatement), and has a better set of morals.
Batman is more willing to break the law when necessary, meaner, smarter, lacks weaknesses Clark has, and more prepared for anything to the point in which he can be considered unbeatable (see Tower of Babel).
They both have superior qualities than the other, which can trade off during situations.
Batman can't defeat Darkseid, and Superman can't solve a case quick enough to save lives. Both have been proven.
Originally posted by Mr. Rhythmic
Superman is stronger, faster, more powerful (which is an understatement), and has a better set of morals.
Batman is more willing to break the law when necessary, meaner, smarter, lacks weaknesses Clark has, and more prepared for anything to the point in which he can be considered unbeatable (see Tower of Babel).They both have superior qualities than the other, which can trade off during situations.
Batman can't defeat Darkseid, and Superman can't solve a case quick enough to save lives. Both have been proven.
Smarter is debatable.
Being meaner doesn't really mean anything, not necessarily good or bad but I can guarantee you that people would be more wary of pissing off Superman than Batman.
Yeah Bruce has weaknesses that Superman doesn't have like human durability, human speed, the need to eat, sleep and breathe.
Breaking the law is also not necessary for Superman to get the job done.
Originally posted by Wei Phoenix
Smarter is debatable.Being meaner doesn't really mean anything, not necessarily good or bad but I can guarantee you that people would be more wary of pissing off Superman than Batman.
Yeah Bruce has weaknesses that Superman doesn't have like human durability, human speed, the need to eat, sleep and breathe.
Breaking the law is also not necessary for Superman to get the job done.
Superman needs to breathe, too, I thought. (Tries to remember a comic, PC.)
Originally posted by LLLLLinkYou act like Clark couldn't ride on Nimbus. Or that Gokou wouldn't be able to be controlled by Poison Ivy's powers. Or be mind controlled. They are pretty much equal when it comes to this. Which is kind of strange for Gokou since he also has the saiyan lust for fighting.
Proof please. Has Superman ever been mind controlled for evil or something like that? At the very least, Goku has the Flying Nimbus as proof of pure-heartedness.
Originally posted by LLLLLink
Proof please. Has Superman ever been mind controlled for evil or something like that? At the very least, Goku has the Flying Nimbus as proof of pure-heartedness.
Being mind controlled has nothing to do with morals. Look at what Superman does day in and day out he is absolutely pure of heart. His no kill policy, the fact that he has died for Earth, the fact that he would do anything to protect one life. Yes he has been mind controlled but that doesn't mean anything against his heart.
Originally posted by Wei Phoenix
Being mind controlled has nothing to do with morals. Look at what Superman does day in and day out he is absolutely pure of heart. His no kill policy, the fact that he has died for Earth, the fact that he would do anything to protect one life. Yes he has been mind controlled but that doesn't mean anything against his heart.
If Supes had the darkness in his heart pulled out by Babidi's magic, would he turn? Goku wasn't even a candidate for it.