Sorry, was updating my profile to include that gem.
DS
Not sure Gideon understands what a pawn is.
Merriam-Webster
one that can be used to further the purposes of another
Nephthys
Nothing credible suggests it, pardon my french.
👆
That Revan betrayed the Emperor and attempted to stop him upon regaining his memories and changing his allegiance doesn't preclude the idea that he was a pawn of the Emperor.
Spoiler:
Though you have no idea how hilariously ironic it is to see you argue against the credibility of a Jedi historian. 😂
I would assume Kreia would be a more credible source in these matters as she actually knows Revan.
However, Revan was already a Dark Jedi before the Emperor just "sithized" him. Then he and Malak turned on the Emperor planning to create their own Empire. And, as Revan's action seem to indicate, he was preparing the galaxy to wage war against the True Sith Empire.
Originally posted by Turr_PhennirAnother example of your convenient used of proposed canon. Also, revan created his own sith empire long before his memory were wiped.
Sorry, was updating my profile to include that gem.👆
That Revan betrayed the Emperor and attempted to stop him upon regaining his memories and changing his allegiance doesn't preclude the idea that he was a pawn of the Emperor.
Spoiler:
Though you have no idea how hilariously ironic it is to see you argue against the credibility of a Jedi historian. 😂
ares834
I would assume Kreia would be a more credible source in these matters as she actually knows Revan.
I'm not speaking of Revan's conversion, I'm speaking of their respective credibility in general. Neph has defended Kreia's breadth of knowledge to the extent that the idea that Ulic Qel-Droma knows something she doesn't angered him severely; and while I'm certain the fact that Kreia is, by his own admission, his favorite character has absolutely nothing to do with this, one wonders why Gnost Dural is incredible in this regard. mmm
Though the fact that she knows Revan could very well be used as an argument against her credibility. "Heart of the Force" indeed.
ares834
However, Revan was already a Dark Jedi before the Emperor just "sithized" him.
Ah, so Revan's allegiance was to the dark side and he was not merely a renegade Jedi? There is a fundamental difference.
ares834
Then he and Malak turned on the Emperor planning to create their own Empire. And, as Revan's action seem to indicate, he was preparing the galaxy to wage war against the True Sith Empire.
So because Vader turned on Palpatine, he wasn't a pawn of the Emperor's? What about Dooku, since he desired to do the same?
Originally posted by Turr_PhennirWhile giving him nothing and holding back an invasion for 300 years. Please explain the pawn part again.
Creating your own empire doesn't retroactively change the past, DS, nor does it change the future, in which Revan is imprisoned and used to fuel the Emperor's devices, going mad in the process.
Originally posted by Turr_Phennir
I'm not speaking of Revan's conversion, I'm speaking of their respective credibility in general. Neph has defended Kreia's breadth of knowledge to the extent that the idea that Ulic Qel-Droma knows something she doesn't angered him severely; and while I'm certain the fact that Kreia is, by his own admission, his favorite character has absolutely nothing to do with this, one wonders why Gnost Dural is incredible in this regard. mmm
I argued this because Kreia was actually a Jedi Historian at the time when Ulic shared this knowledge with the Jedi order. Dural is talking about something that happened hundreds of years ago outside of Republic space. Theres no way for him to have any strong evidence for his claim, nor any way for him to be sure of Revans alliegences, especially given that his version of events contradict Revans own actions and words.