Originally posted by Letum Lettow
Dumbledore was a douchebag who had some wacko form of Autism that made him a good guesser.He still only barely managed to overcome the severe idiocy of the Wizard's.
NO KILLING. NOT EVEN IN SELF-DEFENSE. Everything else is just flavor.
Then again, it may just be Britain, as I doubt any Texan wizard would have tolerated the Death Eaters for too long without calling the original Boyz in the Hood to bring shotguns for enchantment so they can slaughter the dumbasses.
WAT? haermm
Only because my consciousness exists on a higher intellectual plane than where your mind frequents. I cannot lower myself to your level in order to fathom the unconventional wavelengths of your thought patterns. It would be condescending. And I am a benevolent entity who does not engage in such malevolence.
Originally posted by Slash_KMC It is not an indication of anything.
What canonical depictions? Give me a combat scenario in which Revan is actually fighting someone and in which not only the outcome is given. Maybe Malak got overconfident like Maul and was caught by surprise. He could've used medpacs, he could've managed to use the captive Jedi for himself, mines, grenades, weird Force powers that distracted Malak, he could've had a special lightsaber, ...
Bottom line is that we don't know how the fight went. We can only conclude that Malak was beaten and that Revan stood there with a lightsaber, Revan probably beat Malak with a lightsaber, but it isn't conclusive at all.
Btw, stop ignoring my posts.
Originally posted by Red Nemesis
S_W_LeGenD! You'r back! Welcome!
Would you like to rectify the lie you told in the original thread? (You know, the one that had you leave the forum for a lot of months, then show up again for a few posts until TJ asked you to go back to the last thread.)
Originally posted by Enyalus Dunno. Revan defeating Mandalore the Ultimate with a blaster would make him pretty uber. 😛
Originally posted by Letum Lettow This.It's kinda sad when a newb (or old guy returned from death) makes better sense than SWLegend.
To all the Revan lovers out there:
No fights using Unknowns. Unknowns are characters that we have had too little or no evidence of their powers, abilities, or skills. This applies to characters that have not had screen-time, or characters who only show their powers in gameplay.
Yes, I can feel your anger! Now strike me down and your journey towards the Dark Side will be complete!
Originally posted by S_W_LeGenD
It is an indication of Revan using the Force in aggressive situations.
I think everyone is aware that Revan can use the Force. But do we know that he only uses the Force? Obi-Wan also primarily uses the Force and a lightsaber, but how did he defeat Grievous?
Originally posted by S_W_LeGenDAsk Lucas Arts to provide such material to you. Seriously! Many of the characters in expanded universe are known from comics and games. And it is not difficult to evaluate them fairly in the larger picture. From the available data, it is clear that Revan defeated a well prepared Dark Lord of the Sith and that too in a place steeped with the dark energies. Malak even admitted that Revan was stronger than he anticipated.
This is not the first time you tell me to ask the creators for more facts. As long as they haven't given the information, it doesn't exist.
Most characters from the comics and games are well developed. Galen Marek has a novel supporting the Force Unleashed in which a lot more details are given than anything that supports Revan's battles.
Originally posted by S_W_LeGenDWhile we do not know the full details, we do have a hint that Lightsabers were used (Shadows and Light) and that Malak was draining energies from Jedi captives (Star Wars databank) during the duel. And the outcome of the battle is clear. However, if this is not enough that ask Leeland Chee or Drew Karpyshyn to release a graphic comic on Revan's exploits in the Star Forge. They might listen.
We do not know the full details, we do not know any details. The draining of the Jedi is not a detail nor is the outcome of the battle.
Originally posted by Gideon
Dumbledore's cool, but came off like such a Gary Stu in the friggin' books. He's essentially all-powerful, omniscient, and he's the moral heart of the fvcking books. Meanwhile, Voldemort came off looking like a gigantic ass.
Either you missed the last two books of the series, or you didn't pay attention to what you were reading. Worst character analysis ever (with the exception of your Sidious essay). 😛
Originally posted by Borbarad
Either you missed the last two books of the series, or you didn't pay attention to what you were reading. Worst character analysis ever. 😛
Agreed. Dumbledore in his youth was trying to become the ruler of all muggles together with his friend. And he definitely doesn't know everything. The great amount of knowledge he does have is explained by his years of experience.