Originally posted by OneDumbG0
If you really want to track this discussion's progress... I brought up Surfer sitting inside a star as a rebuttal to your electricity-immunity argument. Remember when you started surmising that Surfer was vulnerable to this heat vision ionization technique because nobody could prove Surfer was immune to electricity?Obviously, simply being surrounded by ionized molecules doesn't render Surfer powerless as he's stood inside stars. Accordingly, non-immunity to electricity =/= vulnerability to heat vision ionization technique. Then you tried remedying that by suggesting that Superman's heat vision is incalculable, hotter than stars even, so maybe it is plausible. Well Superman wasn't using this incalculable heat in either of those scans. So incalculable heat wasn't responsible for the ionization-disruption effect.
This entire tangent is deflection. Superman's used intense heat vision a lot. We don't see people's powers being cut off. It also once broke someone's teleportation device. Apparently, it once managed to disrupt the transmission of Jimmy's and Lois' energy into a robot. Arguing it's viable against Surfer and will cut him off from the Power Cosmic -- Surfer who flies through stars and combats Firelord -- is folly. I don't believe it would. Surfer can nonchalantly sit inside a star. And he's been flooded by Firelord's cosmic flames, which are hotter than any star.
This is your interpretation. I believe it is otherwise. Superman uses his HV a lot of times vs different opponents, but not in such a manner to Ionize molecules. When He does the Ionization He does that by targeting the molecules arround someone, thus pausible.