Rage.Of.Olympus
Senior Member
Originally posted by darthgoober
Yeah he did, he specifically said that Thor was more dangerous than he was in their previous encounter, and we all know that in that particular fight he was in the grips of Warrior Madness.And I'm not saying that the vagueness does make it more reliable, I'm just pointing out that I'm not making the claim you think I am.
1) The memory argument.
2) A pissed off Thor is more dangerous than a Warrior Madness Thor. Warrior Madness for like 99% of the time doesn't amp Thor's strength.
3) During his fight with Him, Thor fought solely like a a brick, throwing only punches. During his fight with Warlock and Surfer, Thor fought like a God. Energy projection, flying and so on was in full swing. Which would explain why Warlock believed Thor was more dangerous than he remembered.
Originally posted by darthgoober
Read my post to ODG.An amp is an amp. Lightray's amp from insanity was internal as well, but we still don't consider "bloodlusted Lightray" to be the same as "insane Lightray".
Read it. Doesn't prove anything.
Well, isn't that too bad for Lightray? I however don't doubt Thor could replicate what he did during Blood and Thunder if he were pissed. Thor has high end feats greater than what he did in this story. His high showings in this particular arc however have to be invalidated in some way as said high showings revolved around Thor raping Surfer.
Call it an amp if it helps you sleep better at night. I personally don't care. But don't assume the stance -at least where it was heading- that what Thor did during Blood and Thunder isn't something applicable to him due to a mythical amp. You can call it as outside of his norm if you like. That's fine.