Mass Effect 3

Started by CadoAngelus64 pages

Originally posted by dadudemon
[B]They didn't put the base IN the blackhole. Destroying solar systems may never be possible beyond using super novas (there are some people that think we could cause supernovas...which is possible). It is just not a logistical undertaking so humans will never work towards it.

The Collector base was still a formidable distance from the SMBH, but it was caught in a gravitational well, a Lagrangian Point around the SMBH which means it's stable and doesn't get affected by the gravity.

Yes, the near future. Ray Kurzweil's estimates put this at about 2-3 decades off with nanbots. The conservative estimates put this off at a bit before 2050 (unrelated to the technological singularity, by the way).

not hanging so so much on the nanobots, scientists are finding out - from birds - the genome that can tell how long an animal is going to live naturally - that's excluding any diseases or conditions that may develop later in life. With DNA altering, in theory this time span can be lengthened.

The Reapers' powers are described only partially in the games. I'm taking to believe that ME EU is canonical as Drew Karpyshyn is the author of the games and books. One thing you have to remember is that a "Reaper" is not just an AI, but a mass of AIs working in unison to create a single entity.

If we're talking about feasible technical advancements that the Reapers possess, few of them are viable. AI is a concept that many believe to be achievable, but AI to the philosophical level - which is what Reapers possess - is (in my opinion) impossible. I believe it isn't going to be possible for a Computer to become self-aware.

FTL travel is a theory that has been pulled apart to the best of our understanding, but there's nowhere near enough time or energy for the Human race to achieve it.

Remote viewing is technically possible with miniature-cameras and wireless data-transfer technologies (infra-red, bluetooth, WiFi), though not to the level that the Reapers demonstrate in both ME1 and Retribution. In ME1 it is demonstrated in the final boss battle (somewhat) when Saren is defeated and Sovereign then takes over the cybernetic implants in Saren, and in Retribution it is shown in Grayson being the "guinea pig" for The Illusive Mans experiments and physically becoming a vessel for Reaper Nano-bots to take over. But the remove viewing there is shown across hundreds of light years as the Reapers are still outside of the Milkyway.

The telepathy is arguable, as it is machines interacting on the subconscious level with organic matter, with the indoctrination and post-hypnotic suggestion. The closest we've come to this is in that computer chip some scientist fused to his nerves and tendons where he was able to control his arms movement over a network with computer controls - and similarly with the computer chip that other scientist put in his brain and used it to control a robotic arm half-way around the world.

Originally posted by CadoAngelus
not hanging so so much on the nanobots, scientists are finding out - from birds - the genome that can tell how long an animal is going to live naturally - that's excluding any diseases or conditions that may develop later in life. With DNA altering, in theory this time span can be lengthened.

Sure! We'd have to create a system that had a better immune system to help our bodies clean out bad cells that do not commit suicide.

We'd also have to solve the telomere conundrum. There were 2 other things that had to be solved. All 4 can be done with a perfected DNA system. All 4 can be directly addressed with nanobots.

If we're talking about feasible technical advancements that the Reapers possess, few of them are viable. AI is a concept that many believe to be achievable, but AI to the philosophical level - which is what Reapers possess - is (in my opinion) impossible. I believe it isn't going to be possible for a Computer to become self-aware.

FTL travel is a theory that has been pulled apart to the best of our understanding, but there's nowhere near enough time or energy for the Human race to achieve it.

Remote viewing is technically possible with miniature-cameras and wireless data-transfer technologies (infra-red, bluetooth, WiFi), though not to the level that the Reapers demonstrate in both ME1 and Retribution. In ME1 it is demonstrated in the final boss battle (somewhat) when Saren is defeated and Sovereign then takes over the cybernetic implants in Saren, and in Retribution it is shown in Grayson being the "guinea pig" for The Illusive Mans experiments and physically becoming a vessel for Reaper Nano-bots to take over. But the remove viewing there is shown across hundreds of light years as the Reapers are still outside of the Milkyway.

The telepathy is arguable, as it is machines interacting on the subconscious level with organic matter, with the indoctrination and post-hypnotic suggestion. The closest we've come to this is in that computer chip some scientist fused to his nerves and tendons where he was able to control his arms movement over a network with computer controls - and similarly with the computer chip that other scientist put in his brain and used it to control a robotic arm half-way around the world. [/B][/QUOTE]

Based on what we know, very few of them are not viable and the rest are within our grasp. Remote viewing, networked computers, etc. These are all things we know about and can do, in some form, already. We are already working on "syncing" particles so that we can transmit data between them. The Chinese have done it up to 8.

This is theorized as a way to communicate information faster than light. Not proven exactly, but it looks quite promising. Then there's just understanding things around you to the point that everything is boiled down to "probabilistic determinism". This is demi-God level AI and something we are slated to be on track for if we are not careful.

Also, we can create human-like AI, now. It would just take too much time and money for it to be done. Hell, we could have done it with the processing power we had in the 90s. It's just not feasible for us to do. As our processing power becomes more and more accessible, it is becoming easier and easier to create true AI. We have create VIs (if I can borrow from ME) quite well, already. We should see a human-like AI sometime in 2020-2030 based on current technological progressions. As I pointed out, some technological progressions may cause that date to be sooner...as we are supposed to go "commercial" with one of them in 2014: memristors.

It's actually fairly scary to me. SKYNET! RAAAAGE!

There are two major problems, one is fact, one is (my) opinion mixed with some fact.

#1: Moore's Law is a major factor in computer and computing device technology. Taking into account rapidly advancing computer technologies and resources, as well as our understand of micro-technologies and our adolescent understanding of nano-tech, Moore's Law dictates and predicts that the rapid advancements in computing technologies is actually going be the death of it - not literally killing off technology but significantly slowing down the eventual advancements in technology.

It says that due to the amount of space there is available on the surface of an Integrated Circuit Board and our limited ability to miniaturize every last part if a Circuit, and the ever increasing number of transistors on CPUs and Circuits within computing devices, our advancements in computer technology will come to a point where each new advancement will be few and far between.

#2: Intelligence is arguable. Philosophers and Scientists have argued for decades to try and come up with a single definition of Intelligence - look up the Turing Test and the Chinese Room. So what is Intelligence? Some believe it to be the ability to learn, which is fair enough, as computers are somewhat able to "Learn".

Some more spiritual people believe intelligence to be an unfathomable thing, linked with the consciousness of an individual - somewhat using the idea of Death as the end of an individuals "Intelligence".

But a lot of people believe Intelligence to be a matter of sentience. Being self-aware. And I personally share this view. I don't believe that a computing device can become self-aware. And some may argue against that belief, but take this analogy into account: In the hypothetical situation that a Computing Device had the ability to move and the high-processing ability that many assume to go with AI, if a Computer witnessed a Human jumping off a cliff and plummeting to their death - complete with floor pizza - would that computer be able to tell the difference between someone else jumping, and itself jumping, and when extrapolating the information from itself and someone else jumping in this situation, would the computer be able to tell that it would inevitably be smashed to bits at the bottom of this cliff?

http://www.joystiq.com/2012/01/11/play-mass-effect-3-and-reckoning-demos-unlock-in-game-items-for/

Sweet.

I can't wait for this game. Mass Effect has always felt like the "Star Wars" of this generation to me - fills me with the same wonder and joy every time I play it.

YouTube video

I was looking up Diana Allers and found out she's a news reporter. If she's really a new squad member and survives the Reaper invasion, Frank West is gonna eat his heart out.

YouTube video

Everytime I play the multiplayer, I'm so calling dibs on the Krogan.

Love these two trails, gives the game an epic feel. Can't wait to play Spec Ops with my friends, it's gonna be freakin' sweet.

And I love how they tie the multiplayer in with the single player by having Shepard brief you on the mission.

Chobot droolio

Originally posted by Zack Fair
Chobot droolio

She has some nice big cheeks doesn't she? 😖hifty:

Originally posted by Nemesis X
I was looking up Diana Allers and found out she's a news reporter. If she's really a new squad member and survives the Reaper invasion, Frank West is gonna eat his heart out.

Even if she dies Frank should eat his shoes at least.

I'm loving the all-star cast - even if some of them are carry overs from 1 & 2. It gives the game an epic feel that pairs up amazingly with the Story. I'm hoping there's some reference - if the Illusive Man is going to be a main character again as the Voice Cast trailer would suggest - to Retribution (book) seeing as it's set between 2 & 3 and the Illusive Man plays a big part in that book.

Hmmm, veeeeery suspicious. 😖trokeschin:

YouTube video

FemShep makes everything look 20% more awesome. Just saying.

Originally posted by Nemesis X
YouTube video

FemShep makes everything look 20% more awesome. Just saying.

While the MAN Shepard makes everything look 200% more awesome.

FemShep > MaleShep when she doesn't sound like she's half-asleep. That's why she sucked in ME2.

Only butthurt Jennifer Hale fanboys prefer FemShep.

Mark Meer's performance is ten thousand times better, trufax.

Originally posted by NemeBro
Only butthurt Jennifer Hale fanboys prefer FemShep.

Mark Meer's performance is ten thousand times better, trufax.

Jennifer Hale is pretty damn good, but in Mass Effect she's no better than Mark Meer. Anyway, the actual object of admiration should be this guy.

Dude looks like a skin head.

He's Canadian.