Omega Red vs the Warrior Three

Started by OneDumbG028 pages

Originally posted by Starscream M
the warrior three is not thor

what thor has fended off does not prove that the warrior three would as well

yes, in the end, its all speculation from both sides.

the warrior three is not colossus

what colossus has succumbed to does not prove that the warrior three would as well

yes, in the end, its all speculation from both sides.

Originally posted by OneDumbG0
the warrior three is not colossus

what colossus has succumbed to does not prove that the warrior three would as well

yes, in the end, its all speculation from both sides.

I agree

Originally posted by Starscream M
the warrior three is not thor

what thor has fended off does not prove that the warrior three would as well

yes, in the end, its all speculation from both sides.

They are the same race and Thor's ability to resist isn't based on his powers but rather his physiology, which the Warriors Three share to varying degrees.

Originally posted by OneDumbG0
Colossus has been absorbed, multiple times. You trying to invoke PIS in that regard would be like me showing Fandral getting killed by death spores ten times and me arguing the one time they didn't work should control. Irony.

And Thor has no sold Corruptor's pheremones, which are more potent. You want to make this about godly natures no-selling mutant powers in general randomly, or about godly natures no-selling pheremones randomly? Either way is still a negative proof fallacy.


He also Withstood her absorption as well. I not trying to invoke anything. I saying Rogue is inconsistent, always has been, always will be. Her inconsistancy have no baring on omega red.

You trying to pretend mutant powers operate the same and no selling one equates to no selling the other. When this is simply wrong. Rogue being inconsistent with her showings does not equate over to all mutants.

Originally posted by OneDumbG0
tyes, in the end, its all speculation from both sides.

Except one side is making an educated guess based on the data and hand and the other side is taking a run at the grand canon and hoping they can clear the jump because the Warriors Three "are gods."

^ Whereas you're trying to bridge your gap by equating Asgardians with Colossus. Who's trying to prove more? Me or you? There's a reason the burden's on you more.

Originally posted by Dum Dum Dugan
You trying to pretend mutant powers operate the same and no selling one equates to no selling the other. When this is simply wrong. Rogue being inconsistent with her showings does not equate over to all mutants.
You trying to pretend mutants and Asgardians operate the same and one of them succumbing equates to the other succumbing. When this is simply wrong. Omega Red being inconsistent with his showings even over mutants does not equate over to being consistent over all mutants AND Asgardians.

Originally posted by OneDumbG0
the warrior three is not colossus

what colossus has succumbed to does not prove that the warrior three would as well

yes, in the end, its all speculation from both sides.

Yes we get that.

However in are opinions, Omega red ability to absorb individuals like colossus suggest he should have little trouble doing it to the warrior three. And that them being gods should have little baring on the matter.

Originally posted by srankmissingnin
He isn't base line human. He is psychic energy. It's a pretty cut and dry distinction.

He's a human that developed the ability to survive as phychic energy, which BTW is a type of energy that all telepaths have. are you saying that all telepaths have the ability to resist OR's spores?

Originally posted by OneDumbG0
. Omega Red being inconsistent with his showings even over mutants does not equate over to all mutants AND Asgardians.

Except he not inconsistent. He failed once against a being made of pure energy. That far from inconsistent.

Originally posted by Dum Dum Dugan
However in are opinions, Omega red ability to absorb individuals like colossus suggest he should have little trouble doing it to the warrior three. And that them being gods should have little baring on the matter.
Except when ignoring that mutant powers get no sold by godly natures on-panel. Multiple times, multiple powers, including life absorbing ones. Oops.

You can rely on Colossus = Warriors Three only so many different ways. In the end, that's your argument. You're free to that weak rationale. Because I can easily rebut it by saying Colossus =/= Warriors Three.

Originally posted by Silent Master
He's a human that developed the ability to survive as phychic energy, which BTW is a type of energy that all telepaths have. are you saying that all telepaths have the ability to resist OR's spores?

He doesn't have physic energy. He is psychic energy. He is not a physical entity. He is not human.

Originally posted by srankmissingnin
He doesn't have physic energy. He [b]is psychic energy. He is not a physical entity. He is not human. [/B]

So you're saying that pyschic energy blocks his ability to drain life-force?

Originally posted by OneDumbG0
Except when ignoring that mutant powers get no sold by godly natures on-panel. Multiple times, multiple powers, including life absorbing ones. Oops.

You can rely on Colossus = Warriors Three only so many different ways. In the end, that's your argument. You're free to that weak rationale. Because I can easily rebut it by saying Colossus =/= Warriors Three.


except your problem is your using a single character who inconsistent with mutants as well as if it pertains to omega red when it does not.

What better about warrior three that makes them immune to the life drain?

silent master he is pure pychic energy......

Originally posted by Dum Dum Dugan
There zero way to get absolute prove until he fights a god and he dead now so that doubtful.

However what makes warrior 3 different from colossus that makes them immune.

If Daken powers work effortlessly on Ares, and they are also pheramone based, seems to suggest Omega reds would as well.

so in all his appearances, nobody has any record or scan of omega red fighting any sort of magical or godly being and using his spores on them?

Originally posted by srankmissingnin
I know, they work better. Colossus requires no food. Asgardians do. He requires no sleep. Asgardians do. He requires no air. Asgardians do. He doesn't require periodic digestion of the Golden Apple to sustain his longevity. Asgardians do. He has limitless stamina and energy. Asgardias don't.

But I forgot, none of that matters because they are "gods".

getting snarky about it is only going to make me close the thread quicker.

Originally posted by Silent Master
So you're saying that pyschic energy blocks his ability to drain life-force?

He is pure energy. He doesn't have a life force. HE IS PSYCHIC ENERGY. That is what he is. He is MADE OF ENERGY. Omega Red CANNOT SIPHON PSYCHIC ENERGY, ONLY LIFE FORCE.

Christ, the world must be a frightening place for you. How do you get out of bed in the morning?

Originally posted by Dum Dum Dugan
except your problem is your using a single character who inconsistent with mutants as well as if it pertains to omega red when it does not.
except your problem is your using a single character who inconsistent with mutants as well as if it pertains to the warriors' three when it does not.
Originally posted by Dum Dum Dugan
What betetr about warrior three that makes them immune to the life drain?
Congrats. You're baiting me into proving a negative again as if my not proving the negative somehow bolsters your own arguments. Hint: it doesn't.

Originally posted by srankmissingnin
He is pure energy. He doesn't have a life force. HE IS PSYCHIC ENERGY. That is what he is. He is MADE OF ENERGY. Omega Red CANNOT SIPHON PSYCHIC ENERGY, ONLY LIFE FORCE.

Christ, the world must be a frightening place for you. How do you get out of bed in the morning?

Where is it stated that he doesn't have a life-force?

Originally posted by Silent Master
Where is it stated that he doesn't have a life-force?

Deductive reasoning that someone stated to be made of pure psionic energy, couldn't also be made of a second type of energy...

Originally posted by srankmissingnin
Deductive reasoning that someone stated to be made of pure psionic energy, couldn't also be made of a second type of energy...

IOW, you're making it up.