Darth Maul vs. Darth Vader

Originally posted by Nephthys
Well Qui-Gon was like, 3 times Mauls age.

This is still going? Vader is easily superior and would crush Maul.

Originally posted by playa1258
This is still going? Vader is easily superior and would crush Maul.

Originally posted by quanchi112
Yoda is a lot older yet he wasn't gassed in the films. Think for a second, noob.

Yoda is considerably more powerful than Qui-Gon.

Originally posted by Nephthys
Yoda is considerably more powerful than Qui-Gon.

Not old age, older age. Maul is both younger and more powerful than Qui-Gon. So it's only natural that he tires slower. The Force empowers their bodies, so a more powerful person will tend to last longer than a weaker one.

Originally posted by quanchi112
Based on ?

Originally posted by Nephthys
Not old age, old[b]er age. Maul is both younger and more powerful than Qui-Gon. So it's only natural that he tires slower. The Force empowers their bodies, so a more powerful person will tend to last longer than a weaker one. [/B]

So you agree age doesn't matter at all and that comment was useless.

Originally posted by playa1258
His battle against Obi-wan, and numerous ones against Dooku. His feats from the TCW, ROTS.

Point proven.

It comes down to who was better trained..

Maul or Vadar..

Sidious said himself he was well trained and the Jedi would be no match for him.

Vadar was trained by Obi Wan.

Sideous>Obi Wan

Its not a large leap to think Maul could take Vadar.

Maul definitely wins. Far more athletic and dangerous with a saber than crybaby Vader.

Originally posted by quanchi112
Vader lost skill wise against Obi whereas maul beat him.

Point proven.

No he didn't. He lost because of he was blinded by his rage and made arrogant move.

Originally posted by playa1258
No he didn't. He lost because of he was blinded by his rage and made arrogant move.

That is funny. I remember Maul tumbling down the shaft in two pieces. What you are failing to factor in is, Obi-wan being uniquely qualified to combat Vader. Being his trainer and mentor.

Maul will not have that same advantage and is just one of any reasons Maul will be killed.

Originally posted by Time Immemorial
It comes down to who was better trained..

Maul or Vadar..

Sidious said himself he was well trained and the Jedi would be no match for him.

Vadar was trained by Obi Wan.

Sideous>Obi Wan

Its not a large leap to think Maul could take Vadar.

Captain America has trained Tony Stark in hth combat. Is Tony a better fighter than Batman?

Originally posted by playa1258
That is funny. I remember Maul tumbling down the shaft in two pieces. What you are failing to factor in is, Obi-wan being uniquely qualified to combat Vader. Being his trainer and mentor.

Maul will not have that same advantage and is just one of any reasons Maul will be killed.

Maul wins over the psychologically compromised Vader.

Originally posted by quanchi112
Due to taunting. Skill wise he disarmed and had Obi beaten. I remember Vader being burned alive and pouting sounding like Robtard screaming, I hate you.

😆 😆 😆