Originally posted by Rage.Of.OlympusYou could look at the statement "and the galaxy was swept clean" a few different ways -- I'm not gonna argue semantics, though.
He cleansed an entire Galaxy and destroyed around 3 Solar Systems. And like I pointed out to Kurupt, I don't think he was nearly as weakened as people point out because I'd wager he was leeching the Power Cosmic from those canisters.At the time of that fight, Celesitals were considered to be superior to everyone else. Including Galactus. At least in the Thor offices of Marvel.
Was it ever stated on panel that Galactus was leeching power from any external sources while being held captive? I don't recall such. In fact, this scan suggests the complete opposite:
http://img141.imageshack.us/i/betaraybill03p08.jpg/
If you go by what was shown on panel, Galactus was taken by T&A sometime around Annihilation Day +206, and didn't break free until until Annihilation Day +222. Also consider that a.) we have no idea the last time he fed before being taken -- b.) he expended a lot of power vs. T&A -- c.) while being held captive, his energies were also being used to power the planet-busting 'Galactus Gun' (and per the above scan, so much energy was taken from Galactus that he had to draw on the reservoirs of his very being to survive).
So anyway, despite all the power G used without receiving any sort of replenishment in the process, he was STILL able to unleash such a potent blast. Impressive, imo.
Originally posted by leonidasOk, since you want to be downright slow about this. Galactus almost killed Thanos with the aid of his shields with one blast whereas Odin blasted him without shields for an entire fight showing an enormous power spike for Galactus as opposed to Odin against the same foe.
so you have no proof g>odin, (in fact, odin likely has the greater on-panel feats) let alone g>>>>odin? and yet you still just assume g>>>>odin? that seems like a pretty illogical stance to take.....anyway, you keep quoting how much more powerful the current ss is--what proof do you have that he was actually upgraded power-wise? just because he took a couple shots from t and a? what actual outputs of power has he shown that definitively demonstrate he has been upgraded as much as you seem to believe?
Thanos called his power lilliputian at the time and disputed Odin's superiority. That's on panel proof and I don't respect feat debaters at all. It's weak and actually ignorant imo. Odin has greater feats than abstracts but would get worked by them. More appearances usually means more feats. I'd think with all the time on here you'd get it by now.
Crushing BrB and tanking power shots from these two who beat Galactus. I have stated this numerous times so please actually read the debate don't ask me to repeat myself again.
Originally posted by TheLordofMurderSurfer's been upgraded since the Odin fight. Laughs.
Whoo-hoo!!!Quan is gonna s**t a brick and go into "Hyper-Quan" mode when he reads that!!
😂
His response might be so frantic and desperate that it features no punctuation whatsoever...
💃
Originally posted by Rage.Of.OlympusGood you have conceded most of the debate so it won't be long now until you finally concede the rest.
The rest of your garbage isn't worth effort, but this stuck out to me.I love how you harp on the fact that Odin brought out Gungnir yet don't find it important that the only reason Thanos defeated Thor was because of the weapon he brought out. Oh, and beaten down to your knees and bleeding isn't unfazed. At least in my book.
Oh! So that's why you were claiming Drax with the Power Gem couldn't be defeated physically or knocked out even though Thor clearly did so. Because Thanos couldn't make any headway against Thor wielding the Power Gem, and if Thanos couldn't make any headway, there has to be some excuse.
facepalm
For the rest of your post, just look at my previous post and adjust as necessary.
Thanos needed the weapon since Thor had the power gem. He's smart and knows you can't beat Thor physically but took him on anyways because he was no real threat to him despite this huge amp.
A bloody nose isn't fazing him much at all considering the attacks he hit him with the and relative ease he beat down strange, the watch, and the surfer. This shows how durable and powerful thanos is.
Thor knocked out the gem from his stomach in fact when he took him on prior to being kicked out of the goddess' regime he was told he can't beat him physically right on panel. Context, kiddo. He can lose if he takes the gem off of him and is at a huge advantage since Drax is an idiot but even subconsciously tapping into it he can't beat him physically with the gem.
All stated on panel and it's clear Thor was a much more dangerous threat than Drax ever was yet Thanos easily beat him when he chose to anyways.
You always back down to me.
Originally posted by quanchi112
Ok, since you want to be downright slow about this.
😆
wow, someone's panties are all knotted. stress of having everyone know you're wrong and having to fight everyone finally getting to you? 😖hifty:
Galactus almost killed Thanos with the aid of his shields with one blast whereas Odin blasted him without shields for an entire fight showing an enormous power spike for Galactus as opposed to Odin against the same foe.
cute and all but g was pretty fully fed. i'd agree actually that a well-fed g>odin. still a weak showing for g though. welld fed and still has to use so much to get through shields? tsk-tsk. poor writing. and then there's the fact that thanos did a lot more damage to g with a blast then he did to odin with a blast. meh. no one can change your mind regardless. if all the writers and stan lee himself told you they were equal you wouldn't believe. in fact, i've never seen you change your stance in any debate ever. it's why no one respects you. you refuse to acknowledge that any interpretation but your own may be correct. in a sense you're right--you're undebateable, because no amount of evidence, logic or patience can sway you.
Thanos called his power lilliputian at the time and disputed Odin's superiority.
so now you're not only ignoring feats, but are using spoken words of a known braggart? nice....
That's on panel proof and I don't respect feat debaters at all. It's weak and actually ignorant imo.
everyone is aware of your opinions. problem with your thought process is this: when discussing feats of such magnitude, they cannot be ignored. when odin destroys galaxies and shakes the multiverse, those rea feats that must be looked at. when someone's feats are so impressive, so consistent and in many cases DWARF the feats of others, ignoring them, downplaying them or simply refusing to acknowledge them are what is really ignorant.
Odin has greater feats than abstracts but would get worked by them. More appearances usually means more feats. I'd think with all the time on here you'd get it by now.
lol
true, but odin and g's appearances aren't that far apart i'd wager. common sense and other feats would say that odin is not greater than eternity though eternity doesn't have his feats. you've gone too far the other way. but again, none of this will matter to you. i assure you, i've taken great amusement reading your debate in this thread so far, so i'd be disappointed if you DID change your mind.
Crushing BrB and tanking power shots from these two who beat Galactus. I have stated this numerous times so please actually read the debate don't ask me to repeat myself again.
lol again.
quasar has taken multiple shots from galactus. the INVISIBLE WOMAN has shielded from g. if i looked, i bet even ben grim has withstood a shot. i KNOW others have. so...... whoopee! you have no proof of increased power output. but you've made clear your stance on needing evidence to justify your stance..... no. carry on carrying on my good man. doing so without the insults would be cool though. 😄
Surfer's been upgraded since the Odin fight. Laughs. [/B][/QUOTE]
Originally posted by leonidas[/B][/QUOTE] No, asking me to repeat myself multiple times is annoying. The fact you are arguing Odin's more powerful based off of feats alone is laughable as well.
😆wow, someone's panties are all knotted. stress of having everyone know you're wrong and having to fight everyone finally getting to you? 😖hifty:
cute and all but g was pretty fully fed. i'd agree actually that a well-fed g>odin. still a weak showing for g though. welld fed and still has to use so much to get through shields? tsk-tsk. poor writing. and then there's the fact that thanos did a lot more damage to g with a blast then he did to odin with a blast. meh. no one can change your mind regardless. if all the writers and stan lee himself told you they were equal you wouldn't believe. in fact, i've never seen you change your stance in any debate ever. it's why no one respects you. you refuse to acknowledge that any interpretation but your own may be correct. in a sense you're right--you're undebateable, because no amount of evidence, logic or patience can sway you.
so now you're not only ignoring feats, but are using spoken words of a known braggart? nice....
everyone is aware of your opinions. problem with your thought process is this: when discussing feats of such magnitude, they cannot be ignored. when odin destroys galaxies and shakes the multiverse, those rea feats that must be looked at. when someone's feats are so impressive, so consistent and in many cases DWARF the feats of others, ignoring them, downplaying them or simply refusing to acknowledge them are what is really ignorant.
lol
true, but odin and g's appearances aren't that far apart i'd wager. common sense and other feats would say that odin is not greater than eternity though eternity doesn't have his feats. you've gone too far the other way. but again, none of this will matter to you. i assure you, i've taken great amusement reading your debate in this thread so far, so i'd be disappointed if you DID change your mind.
lol again.
quasar has taken multiple shots from galactus. the INVISIBLE WOMAN has shielded from g. if i looked, i bet even ben grim has withstood a shot. i KNOW others have. so...... whoopee! you have no proof of increased power output. but you've made clear your stance on needing evidence to justify your stance..... no. carry on carrying on my good man. doing so without the insults would be cool though. 😄
Surfer's been upgraded since the Odin fight. Laughs.
He was well nourished and of course him well fed is far greater than Odin. Odin weakened needs to take an odin nap and has never had the showings Galactus has while weakened as being anywhere near as impressive.
That's how impressive his shields are. Saying poor writing is what delusional people say when they can't accept what the writers give us. Odin fought Thanos without his shields and still was unable to do anything past mildly singing his clothes. I gave you a direct comparison and your response is meh. What a copout. Except neither has done so and since we debate based on their histories and comparative showings I'd say the answer is crystal clear.
I can be swayed and have been in the past and I care not for the love of my fellow posters. I'm a killer shark in every thread I enter and you're my prey. Get in my way again and I'll tear you apart again. I take no prisoners and go for the throat and am relentless. That's me love me or hate me it's who I am.
Thanos acknowledges superior power when he sees it and feels it. He isn't a fool by any means and was Odin's peer whereas he wasn't even close to Galactus back then. I argue by what the writer gives me and always will coupled with logic and reason.
Odin's feats are more impressive than Celestial feats outside Scathan that I know of so more feats equals more appearances most often. I can tell the power differences without seeing Galactus affect the multiverse and by this logic Seth is more powerful than Galactus as well since their combined powers did so. Galactus and Tyrant also destroyed galaxies when they fought the first time iirc.
Collateral damage doesn't make an argument it's an impressive feat but doesn't somehow prove Odin's more powerful than those who hasn't done so on panel. I go by portrayal which all should first and foremost not using a feat to incorrectly abuse how these characters are portrayed on panel by a few high feats.
I don't ignore feats I simply don't place higher stock on feats rather than on portrayal.
Galactus does have the feats to beat Odin. I mean the guy has wrecked galaxies through narration, 3 star systems and counting while weakened to defeat an army that was beating the 616 universe into submission, yet you think Odin is in his league ?
This is absurd.
Galactus can also defeat them easily when he wants to. Surfer taking on two beings superior to Odin shows he has been upgraded. Invisible Woman has also easily been owned like most of earth against a severely weakened Galactus. Iw also had aid it wan't like Galactus was just facing off against her his attention is always usually against multiple foes especially when she's involved.
Beating BrB down in a few easy shots proves it to me. You can pretend this isn't the case but I've cited appearances as to why I think so.
He has. Odin's been defeated by ants with his entire army at his back yet you compare him to Galactus who while weakened decimated the annihilation fleet, killed a watcher, etc.
Originally posted by Galan007Lol @ your sig.
You could look at the statement "and the galaxy was swept clean" a few different ways -- I'm not gonna argue semantics, though.Was it ever stated on panel that Galactus was leeching power from any external sources while being held captive? I don't recall such. In fact, this scan suggests the complete opposite:
http://img141.imageshack.us/i/betaraybill03p08.jpg/If you go by what was shown on panel, Galactus was taken by T&A sometime around Annihilation Day +206, and didn't break free until until Annihilation Day +222. Also consider that a.) we have no idea the last time he fed before being taken -- b.) he expended a lot of power vs. T&A -- c.) while being held captive, his energies were also being used to power the planet-busting 'Galactus Gun' (and per the above scan, so much energy was taken from Galactus that he had to draw on the reservoirs of his very being to survive).
So anyway, despite all the power G used without receiving any sort of replenishment in the process, he was STILL able to unleash such a potent blast. Impressive, imo.
Originally posted by Galan007
You could look at the statement "and the galaxy was swept clean" a few different ways -- I'm not gonna argue semantics, though.
I'm pretty sure various good guys were in the Galaxy at the time of the cleansing and survived including the planets their were on.
Originally posted by Galan007
Was it ever stated on panel that Galactus was leeching power from any external sources while being held captive? I don't recall such. In fact, this scan suggests the complete opposite:
http://img141.imageshack.us/i/betaraybill03p08.jpg/
You misunderstood me, I'm not arguing that Galactus was satiating himself with other power sources while being held captive.
I'm aware of that scene as well. My argument isn't that Galactus was restored after he leeched on the canisters, my argument is that he leeched on them to aid him in unleashing the "Herald My Rage" attack. Here's the scene I'm referring to:
http://img440.imageshack.us/img440/2237/galactus1.jpg
http://img717.imageshack.us/img717/2527/galactus2.jpg
Granted, I misremembered Annihilus statement. I thought it was more conclusive.
Originally posted by Galan007
If you go by what was shown on panel, Galactus was taken by T&A sometime around Annihilation Day +206, and didn't break free until until Annihilation Day +222. Also consider that a.) we have no idea the last time he fed before being taken -- b.) he expended a lot of power vs. T&A -- c.) while being held captive, his energies were also being used to power the planet-busting 'Galactus Gun' (and per the above scan, so much energy was taken from Galactus that he had to draw on the reservoirs of his very being to survive).So anyway, despite all the power G used without receiving any sort of replenishment in the process, he was STILL able to unleash such a potent blast. Impressive, imo.
See above. We weren't on the same page.
Originally posted by quanchi112
Good you have conceded most of the debate so it won't be long now until you finally concede the rest.
I haven't conceded anything. It'd take me no more than 4 minutes to reply to your post.
Originally posted by quanchi112
Thanos needed the weapon since Thor had the power gem. He's smart and knows you can't beat Thor physically but took him on anyways because he was no real threat to him despite this huge amp.
Thanos needed the weapon because Thor was a threat to him.
Originally posted by quanchi112
A bloody nose isn't fazing him much at all considering the attacks he hit him with the and relative ease he beat down strange, the watch, and the surfer. This shows how durable and powerful thanos is.
He was fazed:
http://i38.photobucket.com/albums/e139/RageOfTheGod/Thor/ThanosvsThor7.jpg
http://i38.photobucket.com/albums/e139/RageOfTheGod/Thor/ThanosvsThor8.jpg
Originally posted by quanchi112
Thor knocked out the gem from his stomach in fact when he took him on prior to being kicked out of the goddess' regime he was told he can't beat him physically right on panel. Context, kiddo. He can lose if he takes the gem off of him and is at a huge advantage since Drax is an idiot but even subconsciously tapping into it he can't beat him physically with the gem.
One shot ko while Drax possessed the Gem:
http://i38.photobucket.com/albums/e139/RageOfTheGod/Thor/InfinityWatchvsThor1fight2.jpg
I don't give a shit what Moondragon was saying while attempting to coerce Thor into abandoning the battle. She was clearly proven wrong in her assessment.
Originally posted by quanchi112
All stated on panel and it's clear Thor was a much more dangerous threat than Drax ever was yet Thanos easily beat him when he chose to anyways.
He beat Thor with a weapon. Because he couldn't do shit on his own.
Originally posted by quanchi112
You always back down to me.
Gtfo. Quan, if choosing not to reply is backing down, then you've got your ass kicked twice by me recently. Their is still an non replied to post in this very thread as I recall.
Originally posted by Rage.Of.OlympusThus you have conceded.
I haven't conceded anything. It'd take me no more than 4 minutes to reply to your post.Thanos needed the weapon because Thor was a threat to him.
He was fazed:
http://i38.photobucket.com/albums/e139/RageOfTheGod/Thor/ThanosvsThor7.jpg
http://i38.photobucket.com/albums/e139/RageOfTheGod/Thor/ThanosvsThor8.jpgOne shot ko while Drax possessed the Gem:
http://i38.photobucket.com/albums/e139/RageOfTheGod/Thor/InfinityWatchvsThor1fight2.jpgI don't give a shit what Moondragon was saying while attempting to coerce Thor into abandoning the battle. She was clearly proven wrong in her assessment.
He beat Thor with a weapon. Because he couldn't do shit on his own.
Gtfo. Quan, if choosing not to reply is backing down, then you've got your ass kicked twice by me recently. Their is still an non replied to post in this very thread as I recall.
Thor brought his own weapon and the only reason Thor was a threat was th epower gem whereas Thanos used his own tech. The power gem was an outside power source Thor didn't create. Thanos owned him nonetheless.
Thos scans are prior to Thanos smiling only with a bloody nose proving Pip wrong on panel as he thought Thanos was really taking a beating to which he wasn't. He toyed with Thor and ended him when he grew bored.
Drax isn't ko'd he's only down. LOL. Drax also wasn't citing as accessing the power gem and is known for his stupidity. When he did it was stated on panel Thor cannot beat him by Moondragon.
Nope, it depends clearly on accessing the power gem and the reason Drax was given this gem was because he was stupid. I shouldn't have to explain the obvious to you over and over again.
Thor brought his own amp outside his own gear whereas Thanos beat him with his own tech you hypocrite.
I think you're wrong as I have replied to every post I have seen. If I missed one it's only due to a mistake on my part as something I overlooked. What page ?
Originally posted by quanchi112
[QUOTE] No, asking me to repeat myself multiple times is annoying. The fact you are arguing Odin's more powerful based off of feats alone is laughable as well.He was well nourished and of course him well fed is far greater than Odin. Odin weakened needs to take an odin nap and has never had the showings Galactus has while weakened as being anywhere near as impressive.
That's how impressive his shields are. Saying poor writing is what delusional people say when they can't accept what the writers give us. Odin fought Thanos without his shields and still was unable to do anything past mildly singing his clothes. I gave you a direct comparison and your response is meh. What a copout. Except neither has done so and since we debate based on their histories and comparative showings I'd say the answer is crystal clear.
I can be swayed and have been in the past and I care not for the love of my fellow posters. I'm a killer shark in every thread I enter and you're my prey. Get in my way again and I'll tear you apart again. I take no prisoners and go for the throat and am relentless. That's me love me or hate me it's who I am.
Thanos acknowledges superior power when he sees it and feels it. He isn't a fool by any means and was Odin's peer whereas he wasn't even close to Galactus back then. I argue by what the writer gives me and always will coupled with logic and reason.
Odin's feats are more impressive than Celestial feats outside Scathan that I know of so more feats equals more appearances most often. I can tell the power differences without seeing Galactus affect the multiverse and by this logic Seth is more powerful than Galactus as well since their combined powers did so. Galactus and Tyrant also destroyed galaxies when they fought the first time iirc.
Collateral damage doesn't make an argument it's an impressive feat but doesn't somehow prove Odin's more powerful than those who hasn't done so on panel. I go by portrayal which all should first and foremost not using a feat to incorrectly abuse how these characters are portrayed on panel by a few high feats.
I don't ignore feats I simply don't place higher stock on feats rather than on portrayal.
Galactus does have the feats to beat Odin. I mean the guy has wrecked galaxies through narration, 3 star systems and counting while weakened to defeat an army that was beating the 616 universe into submission, yet you think Odin is in his league ?
This is absurd.
Galactus can also defeat them easily when he wants to. Surfer taking on two beings superior to Odin shows he has been upgraded. Invisible Woman has also easily been owned like most of earth against a severely weakened Galactus. Iw also had aid it wan't like Galactus was just facing off against her his attention is always usually against multiple foes especially when she's involved.
Beating BrB down in a few easy shots proves it to me. You can pretend this isn't the case but I've cited appearances as to why I think so.
He has. Odin's been defeated by ants with his entire army at his back yet you compare him to Galactus who while weakened decimated the annihilation fleet, killed a watcher, etc. [/b]
to recap--
so we've established you seem unable to debate without belittling and insulting.
we've established you put less credence in feats than in your own opinion of a character.
and we've established you don't even NEED feats or can extrapolate hugely based on very limited feats.
we've also established that it IS pointless to debate with you. i give you feats like IW withstanding g's blasts, and you..... give me lowball IW feats??? 😂 yet i'm copping out. way to stick to your guns 'shark'.
i wonder how weak you think g would have to be for odin to beat him. as regards your ss conclusions--you have zero proof anything has changed in his powerset. no increased output, nothing more impressive now than before. 2 feats off the top of my head that were more impressive than the t and a feats are overpowering mephisto one-on-one in hell--something even g himself couldn't do, and taking shots from mu AT HALF STRENGTH--mu who was a peer or according to him (which should be good enough for you) more powerful than g and then ss actually DEFEATED him. there are other feats that are comparable as well. those feats alone are at least as good as the t and a feats. if not, they are damn close. close for any logical person to wonder whether it was just a change of attitude that g unleashed in norrin. if a corresponding power amp went with it, it certainly doesn't seem like it would have been much, especially without ANY evidence of increased power output. ss's also taken shots from stranger.
as far as your feats issue--logic and 'opinion' only carries so far. when you discuss such levels of power, it is only logical to assume characters are peers. it's not like odin has only a 'couple' feats. he has dozens. you like to highlight his low feats, yet a group of heroes nearly KILLED g. Alpha flight COULD have killed him after his power was expended in another universe. g's power runs out VERY quickly. we've seen odin fight for LONG periods of time. and he needs sleep??? 😑
g needs to eat planets or dies. and he needs to feed FREQUENTLY. odinsleep only happens VERY rarely (rage prolly knows how often exactly, but i forget). so....... great point. 😐
and something i find funny--g NEVER broke quasar's shields during their battle. quasar's shields>thanos's apparently. cool.
well done shark. i'm guess i was just devoured again. 😂
The Odin sleep usually occured once a year but it's not a limitation. IIRC, King Thor didn't go into the Odin Sleep for a decade.
Originally posted by quanchi112
Thus you have conceded.
I did no such thing.
Originally posted by quanchi112
Thor brought his own weapon and the only reason Thor was a threat was th epower gem whereas Thanos used his own tech. The power gem was an outside power source Thor didn't create. Thanos owned him nonetheless.
Thor used Mjolnir as a melee weapon. Thanos was the coward who resorted to imprisoning his foe instead of fighting him like a real man.
So what?
Thanos is nothing but a coward, and a loser. Masterson Thor kicked his ass even when he had the Infinity Gauntlet.
http://i779.photobucket.com/albums/yy73/R-O-G/Thor/ThorvsThanos1.jpg
Lol. What a limp wrist ******.
Originally posted by quanchi112
Thos scans are prior to Thanos smiling only with a bloody nose proving Pip wrong on panel as he thought Thanos was really taking a beating to which he wasn't. He toyed with Thor and ended him when he grew bored.
http://i38.photobucket.com/albums/e139/RageOfTheGod/Thor/ThanosvsThor9.jpg
How does Thanos getting a kick out of being knocked around prove that he was unfazed?
Originally posted by quanchi112
Drax isn't ko'd he's only down. LOL. Drax also wasn't citing as accessing the power gem and is known for his stupidity. When he did it was stated on panel Thor cannot beat him by Moondragon.
Stop lying. We saw Drax's limp body being dragged up two pages later.
So what? At that point unless it's stated otherwise, Drax is accessing the Power Gem when enraged or worked up. Which he was:
http://i38.photobucket.com/albums/e139/RageOfTheGod/Thor/InfinityWatchvsThor1fight1.jpg
Point to me where it was stated Thor was accessing the Power Gem in his fight with Thanos.
Originally posted by quanchi112
Nope, it depends clearly on accessing the power gem and the reason Drax was given this gem was because he was stupid. I shouldn't have to explain the obvious to you over and over again.
So what if his stupid? He accesses the Power Gem subconsciously when worked up.
Originally posted by quanchi112
Thor brought his own amp outside his own gear whereas Thanos beat him with his own tech you hypocrite.
Irrelevant.
Originally posted by quanchi112
I think you're wrong as I have replied to every post I have seen. If I missed one it's only due to a mistake on my part as something I overlooked. What page ?
Well then I missed a post. I have no idea, look through the thread. It was about the Celestials mostly.
Originally posted by Rage.Of.Olympus
The Odin sleep usually occured once a year but it's not a limitation. IIRC, King Thor didn't go into the Odin Sleep for a decade.I did no such thing.
Thor used Mjolnir as a melee weapon. Thanos was the coward who resorted to imprisoning his foe instead of fighting him like a real man.
So what?
Thanos is nothing but a coward, and a loser. Masterson Thor kicked his ass even when he had the Infinity Gauntlet.
http://i779.photobucket.com/albums/yy73/R-O-G/Thor/ThorvsThanos1.jpg
Lol. What a limp wrist ******.
http://i38.photobucket.com/albums/e139/RageOfTheGod/Thor/ThanosvsThor9.jpg
How does Thanos getting a kick out of being knocked around prove that he was unfazed?
Stop lying. We saw Drax's limp body being dragged up two pages later.
So what? At that point unless it's stated otherwise, Drax is accessing the Power Gem when enraged or worked up. Which he was:
http://i38.photobucket.com/albums/e139/RageOfTheGod/Thor/InfinityWatchvsThor1fight1.jpgPoint to me where it was stated Thor was accessing the Power Gem in his fight with Thanos.
So what if his stupid? He accesses the Power Gem subconsciously when worked up.
Irrelevant.
Well then I missed a post. I have no idea, look through the thread. It was about the Celestials mostly.
yo, rage--how often does odin need the odinsleep? can't recall off-hand.
and the powergem/thor fight was good, but he likes to LOWBALL stuff. a couple of my personal faves include thanos getting knocked around by morg and even STARFOX in the past, or how, even with the IG he couldn't save the universe from anomaly.
personally, i don't put much stock in any of those instances, but since lowballing seems to be part of his m.o. (lowballing IW??? 😂 ) i thought i'd throw them out there just for fun. 🙂
Originally posted by leonidas
yo, rage--how often does odin need the odinsleep? can't recall off-hand.and the powergem/thor fight was good, but he likes to LOWBALL stuff. a couple of my personal faves include thanos getting knocked around by morg and even STARFOX in the past, or how, even with the IG he couldn't save the universe from anomaly.
personally, i don't put much stock in any of those instances, but since lowballing seems to be part of his m.o. (lowballing IW??? 😂 ) i thought i'd throw them out there just for fun. 🙂
Once a year as I believe.
Lowballing is like a hobby. I'm done debating with him. I'm just going to have fun with it.
Yeah, Thanos is a real pussy.
http://i779.photobucket.com/albums/yy73/R-O-G/Thor/ThorvsThanos5.jpg
http://i779.photobucket.com/albums/yy73/R-O-G/Thor/ThorvsThanos6.jpg
If he didn't have the Infinity Gauntlet, Masterson would have killed him.
Originally posted by Rage.Of.Olympus
Once a year as I believe.Lowballing is like a hobby. I'm done debating with him. I'm just going to have fun with it.
Yeah, Thanos is a real pussy.
http://i779.photobucket.com/albums/yy73/R-O-G/Thor/ThorvsThanos5.jpg
http://i779.photobucket.com/albums/yy73/R-O-G/Thor/ThorvsThanos6.jpgIf he didn't have the Infinity Gauntlet, Masterson would have killed him.
lol
when you're food for the shark, all you CAN do is sit back and laugh....
Originally posted by leonidas
lolwhen you're food for the shark, all you CAN do is sit back and laugh....
Is that what he said? Lol.
Besides, we all know how the mightiest figure on Earth handles sharks.
http://i989.photobucket.com/albums/af17/RageOfOlympus/Thor/CreatesWhirpool.jpg
Quan's about as effective as Thanos.
http://i779.photobucket.com/albums/yy73/R-O-G/Thor/ThorvsThanos17.jpg
