1:46 to 1:51 we can clearly spot that the ki blast is different from the one used in the Ganondorf boss fight.
The one in the boss fight is lightning based, but for gameplay reasons is slower than the "ki blast", I am offended by this term, for the record. >| We already have a cutscene of an inferior attack moving faster than the gameplay attack, too fast for them to bother letting us see it, infact. And the others cling to the gameplay speed. >_>
Why would Ganondorf purposely use a inferior attack? Well that's quite simple dear chaps: He isn't. He is trading speed for power here. Consider the fact that that ball of lightning energy is packing enough power to momentarily stun Ganondorf. That indicates quite a bit of power, wouldn't you agree LLLC? It would make sense that he would use it. His triforce is power so obviously super powerful magic attacks are his thing. He is not thinking Link is a threat, probably because of his ego. He underestimates Link, who fell to an inferior attack 7 years prior, though he was only a child.
=| So, lightning is stronger if you slow it down? No, that holds no water, whatsoever. Nothing ever suggests that, and that would infact require Ganondorf to use his magic to intentionally make the lightning slower. This is not a valid theory.
So there are two choices: Accept the gameplay video or accept the cutscene speed, which is significantly faster than the former. The attacks appear to be very different but on the whole they are essentially the same ki blast wise. It's unlikely the dev team cared either way.
Atleast you can see the cutscene, I think the others have simply scripted what they'd like to see and remembered that, instead. >=| I get so sick of the constant downplaying, man. After this thread, I retire again.
And would SOMEONE please for the LOVE OF GOD, post a ****ING FEAT FOR LLOYD?
Holy shit, guys. Do any of you even support him, or are you just here to give me grey hair constantly shooting down your oddball theories?! Greiver? Neph? Tac? Wtf. 😐
Note, Aura, your name's not there, your explanation atleast is within the realm of something rational, even if it's not really something that makes sense, it's not: "THERE MUST BE A TIMESLOW ANIMATION WHEN SOMETHING IS FAST."
holy shit. I am frustrated.