Wizard, Death Eater, Jedi or Sith?

Started by Rogue Jedi7 pages

Originally posted by Lord Shadow Z
Jedi's are not strict monks, that is only the PT stereotype. That structure dissolved with the OT movies and in them Luke is liberated from that 'old order'.

Even then I could go by the Star Wars EU where Luke is free to have a relationship with Mara Jade easily enough.

Well, truth be told, I had the PT Jedi in mind when I made this thread.

Originally posted by Rogue Jedi
Well, truth be told, I had the PT Jedi in mind when I made this thread.

Ah.

Originally posted by Rogue Jedi
Think about what you're saying.....

You claim you'll be more powerful than Dumbledore, Voldemort, the Death Eaters and the OOTP combined. Dumbledore is the most powerful in HPverse, Voldemort a close second. That's double Dumbledore's powers. Ass on 15-20 Death Eaters, then another 15-20 OOTP members.

You claim you would be more powerful than all of them combined. That kind of power does not exist in HPverse. So right there, your argument falls flat on it's face.

You call it PIS, I call it going by their rules. You must go by their rules. No exceptions.

Originally posted by dadudemon
I would not because the only curse that I would use, if I wanted to, would be imperio and no wizarding army would be powerful enough to take me down because I don't fall subject to the PIS that the characters, in universe, do.

haermm MAN......You do know what "no exceptions" means, right?

Death Eater

You're hot.

Man, the RJxDDM relationship gays up another thread.

I hate you guys.

Originally posted by Grate the Vraya
Can a lightsaber deflect avadakedavera?
It's a srs question...

Originally posted by Grate the Vraya
It's a srs question...

It can be blocked/stopped by doors, tombstones and such, iirc. So lightsabre blocking is arguable.

Originally posted by Robtard
It can be blocked/stopped by doors, tombstones and such, iirc. So lightsabre blocking is arguable.
K...hmmm I think I would be a sith then. Are there really any rules/restrictions for them?

Originally posted by Grate the Vraya
K...hmmm I think I would be a sith then. Are there really any rules/restrictions for them?

They strive for power; have little or no qualms who they step-on, use or crush along the way.

The closest thing that comes to mind would be modern religious Republicans.

So, they can't not strive for power and they can't have qualms? It's better than suckin moldy voldy's dick all day long so yeah...i'm thinkin sith.

Originally posted by Grate the Vraya
It's better than suckin moldy voldy's dick all day long so yeah...

RJ disagrees, he's loves that cock. It's well documented.

The cock or Rj's love of it?

lulface

Originally posted by Grate the Vraya
It's a srs question...

And the serious answer is "no one knows".

Originally posted by Bardock42
And the serious answer is "no one knows".

Na, it's simple logic:

lightsabre > door

door > death spell.

ergo we can safely conclude that lightsabre > death spell

Originally posted by Robtard
Na, it's simple logic:

lightsabre > door

door > death spell.

ergo we can safely conclude that lightsabre > death spell

That's sadly not a thorough logical derivation.

Originally posted by Bardock42
That's sadly not a thorough logical derivation.

Prove it isn't!

Originally posted by Bardock42
That's sadly not a thorough logical derivation.
Sure it is, it's the transitive property of...better than...or something.