Rambo versus Endor

Started by Rogue Jedi21 pages

Originally posted by Sadako of Girth
Where are these Admirals coming from...?

We only see AT-AT commanders on the ATATs.
Their orders are issued from command stations via Hologram.

So you're saying that AT AT commanders are more efficient than someone like, say, Veers? Ozzel?

Re: Rambo versus Endor

Originally posted by Rogue Jedi
2 AT-AT's
10 AT-ST's
The entire 501st legion of Stormtroopers (Let's say 500 in number)

Lol wat?

Yup.

Originally posted by Rogue Jedi
So you're saying that AT AT commanders are more efficient than someone like, say, Veers? Ozzel?

Maybe...all I know is that the films are saying that they are all very efficient, yet Vader is extremely intolorant of the guy immediately under him.
That poor guy takes it in the arse for the whole fleet.

Respect for this keeps all the guys under that guy in line, and that keeps the guys under THEM in line etc.

Originally posted by Sadako of Girth
Maybe...all I know is that the films are saying that they are all very efficient, yet Vader is extremely intolorant of the guy immediately under him.
That poor guy takes it in the arse for the whole fleet.

Respect for this keeps all the guys under that guy in line, and that keeps the guys under THEM in line etc.

Mhm, the films also say the stormtroopers are deadly and efficient, and.......well........yeah.....

Originally posted by Rogue Jedi
OK, Rambo exits the AT AT, approaches the second, limping as if wounded, carrying a dead admiral, claims he killed Rambo, the door opens.......raaaaaaaaaaaaaape.

Few things:

The AT-ATs are likely communication linked, as this is an active battle, so the second AT-AT will likely hear what happened in the first and would be highly suspicious, after all, this one man has just killed 500 troopers, 2 AT-STs and an AT-AT.

Rambo's "Ah, Aye, Ah Oh" manner of speaking comes back into play.

Again, all this happening as you claim seems plausible to you?

Originally posted by Robtard
Few things:

The AT-ATs are likely communication linked, as this is an active battle, so the second AT-AT will likely hear what happened in the first and would be highly suspicious, after all, this one man has just killed 500 troopers, 2 AT-STs and an AT-AT.

Rambo's "Ah, Aye, Ah Oh" manner of speaking comes back into play.

Again, all this happening as you claim seems plausible to you?

This is where the RPG and the weak neck come into play.

The troopers get in the AT-AT's and burn the forest down.

/thread?

RPG just bounces off of its shielded armour. It lacks anchorage and focus of energy.

Prove otherwise.

Originally posted by Nephthys
The troopers get in the AT-AT's and burn the forest down.

/thread?

FTW

Originally posted by Rogue Jedi
This is where the RPG and the weak neck come into play.

You really need to make up your mind, you went with Rambo donning trooper gear and entering an the AT-ATs cos the "rpg to the neck" was a fail. But now it's back? No.

Originally posted by Robtard
You really need to make up your mind, you went with Rambo donning trooper gear and entering an the AT-ATs cos the "rpg to the neck" was a fail. But now it's back? No.
Lulz, dude. The weak neck argument is win. You dismissed it, so I brought in donning their gear. That's 2-0, RJ.

Originally posted by Rogue Jedi
Lulz, dude. The weak neck argument is win. You dismissed it, so I brought in donning their gear.

That's 2-0, RJ.

No. You've yet to prove that an RPG will destroy an AT-AT, neck hit or otherwise.

More like: 2-0, insanity/delusional. Reason and Logic are taking a serious beating in this thread.

Originally posted by Robtard
No. You've yet to prove that an RPG will destroy an AT-AT, neck hit or otherwise.

More like: 2-0, insanity/delusional. Reason and Logic is taking a serious beating in this thread.

+1

Making it 3-0 to insanity/delusional. 😛

No, thats 0-2 RJ. Honestly dude, you have no clue what your arguing about, or else you woulnt ignore whatever contradicted it in a "nu uh" post.

RPG lacks the explosive force to take out an M1A2 Abrams MBT. Thats only a couple inches of steel in reactive armor, but it barely dents it. And RPG-7 is an anti emplacement/armor weapon, but its not on par with a MILAN or LAW rocket, as it cant take out a MBT. An AT-AT is a futuristic MBT with more armor, and stronger armor.
Also, the claymore pellets might not get through Stormies armor, as it was made to deflect shrapnel. It would go through the body suit, but not all would penetrate the armor itself.

Originally posted by Pwned
No, thats 0-2 RJ. Honestly dude, you have no clue what your arguing about, or else you woulnt ignore whatever contradicted it in a "nu uh" post.

RPG lacks the explosive force to take out an M1A2 Abrams MBT. Thats only a couple inches of steel in reactive armor, but it barely dents it. And RPG-7 is an anti emplacement/armor weapon, but its not on par with a MILAN or LAW rocket, as it cant take out a MBT. An AT-AT is a futuristic MBT with more armor, and stronger armor.
Also, the claymore pellets might not get through Stormies armor, as it was made to deflect shrapnel. It would go through the body suit, but not all would penetrate the armor itself.

See..? Pwned knows wizard magic too, RJ.

"Argumentus rapium" in effect. 😛

Originally posted by Pwned
No, thats 0-2 RJ. Honestly dude, you have no clue what your arguing about, or else you woulnt ignore whatever contradicted it in a "nu uh" post.

RPG lacks the explosive force to take out an M1A2 Abrams MBT. Thats only a couple inches of steel in reactive armor, but it barely dents it. And RPG-7 is an anti emplacement/armor weapon, but its not on par with a MILAN or LAW rocket, as it cant take out a MBT. An AT-AT is a futuristic MBT with more armor, and stronger armor.
Also, the claymore pellets might not get through Stormies armor, as it was made to deflect shrapnel. It would go through the body suit, but not all would penetrate the armor itself.

They're called "tankbusters." Why is that?

The claymores would **** a stormtrooper up and good, dude. Explosions>>>>>>>>>>>>>>.Stormtrooper armor.

Originally posted by Robtard
No. You've yet to prove that an RPG will destroy an AT-AT, neck hit or otherwise.

More like: 2-0, insanity/delusional. Reason and Logic are taking a serious beating in this thread.

The neck is a weak point. Can you prove it is not so weak that an RPG will fubar it?

Yes. A grenade, no matter how rocket proppelled lacks the concentration of energy, that blasters have....(and blasters were useless against that shielded armour until it was on the floor, shields disabled) and lacks the anchorage to do damage.

Thats why Luke proposed they went for the legs...!!!!

AND

Gravity is not gonna be on that round's side either, most likely, having to shoot directly up at the neck (which he'd have to be at fu*king close range in order to do..)

There. Thats your neck attack in smithereens.

Originally posted by Sadako of Girth
Yes. A grenade, no matter how rocket proppelled lacks the concentration of energy, that blasters have....(and blasters were useless against that shielded armour until it was on the floor, shields disabled) and lacks the anchorage to do damage.

Thats why Luke proposed they went for the legs...!!!!

AND

Gravity is not gonna be on that round's side either, most likely, having to shoot directly up at the neck (which he'd have to be at fu*king close range in order to do..)

There. Thats your neck attack in smithereens.

Movie grenades, duder, NOT real life grenades. After all, 9mm gunfire does not throw people back ten feet in real life.

Originally posted by Rogue Jedi

The neck is a weak point. Can you prove it is not so weak that an RPG will fubar it?

Few things:

-It's for you to prove it can. Not you get to say whatever improbable thing and then people have to dispel it or it's correct, just cos.

-An RPG is designed to take out barriers and light-armoured vehicles.

-An AT-AT is a heavily armoured war-machine from an advanced civilization.

-It took a fall to the face and then a snow-speeder's blaster fire to destroy one. (though as I said, it wasn't a neck shot).

So from that we know above, it's likely not happening, unless you can show that an RPG can at least replicate the damage of a snow-speeder's blaster fire, that for a start would be nice; you've avoided this 5-6 times now.