Originally posted by psycho gundam
hopefully you are seeing how fuktarded this all is
Oh no, this isn't even the stupidest thing he's done power wise. How about punching reality? Or sealing a hole in reality with his heat vision? Or taking on the power of an abstract (see the Sun dipped Superman vs Thor with Power Gem thread)?
This character is starting to annoy the xxxx out of me now.
Originally posted by Philosophíai can't speak for them
You're right, ODG's post was trolling - Newjak's was a random personal attack.
Originally posted by zopzopthor and hulk have stupid shit like that also
Oh no, this isn't even the stupidest thing he's done power wise. How about punching reality? Or sealing a hole in reality with his heat vision? Or taking on the power of an abstract (see the Sun dipped Superman vs Thor with Power Gem thread)?This character is starting to annoy the xxxx out of me now.
Originally posted by Parmaniac
Tell me you're not talking about Siege.
No, I'm talking about Avengers 304 I think it was. He withstood Vector going all out while being bombarded full force by X-ray and didn't move or cry out in pain. He then went on to pwn them both. And what happened during Siege?
And Vector also Repelled reality in the 616 earth realm too.
What issue?
Originally posted by zopzop
Oh no, this isn't even the stupidest thing he's done power wise. How about punching reality? Or sealing a hole in reality with his heat vision? Or taking on the power of an abstract (see the Sun dipped Superman vs Thor with Power Gem thread)?This character is starting to annoy the xxxx out of me now.
Originally posted by zopzopNo, I'm talking about Avengers 304 I think it was. He withstood Vector going all out while being bombarded full force by X-ray and didn't move or cry out in pain. He then went on to pwn them both. And what happened during Siege?
What issue? [/B]
I would not call that a good showing for Thor considering he could not advance and it looked to be taking all he had just to hold his ground.
Originally posted by Philosophía
Expand on why.
if you are asking what value would be considered larger than X, you need a reliable understanding of what X is
else, you can either argue about what X is, or say "X+1", that is, argue about Superman's indeterminate feats, or say "thor's greatest strength feat +1 pound". Given that these "greatest strength feats" are almost entirely subjective as in how much strength would actually be required, this option again just falls into arguing over the value of X needed for your question.
or, put as a simile, its like you are trying to fly a plane, yet you haven't assembled the pieces. The thing you want is contingent upon this other thing that is entirely nebulous at best...
make sense?
Originally posted by zopzopSM didnt really beat it down, just pushed warwolrd through a portal opened by luthor. nova prime shoved the sphynx with two ka stones through a portal he opened himself and he wasnt amped to do it. is he abstract level because of it?
No Imperiax (or how ever you spell it).
Re: Theoretical feats contest
Originally posted by Philosophía
What feats would a character have to do, at bare minimum, baring direct comparisons (and also, assume they're from different companies, so ABC comparisons don't exist either), in order to think him as:a). Being stronger than Thor.
b). Being stronger than Thanos.
c). Being fast enough to speedblitz Silver Surfer to a knockout, before Silver Surfer'd be able to mount any kind of counter-attack/defense.
d). Being fast enough to speedblitz Thor to a knockout, before Thor'd be able to mount any kind of counter-attack/defense.
e). Being fast enough to speedblitz Thanos to a knockout, before Thanos'd be able to mount any kind of counter-attack/defense.
a) be able to move something half of the moons weight
b)be able to move 5/8 moons weight
c)move at 1/2 speed of light instantly
d)move at multiples speed of sound
e)move at multiple speed of sound
Originally posted by inimalistI understand perfectly what you're saying - that there exist unquantifiable feats of strength, and that you can't accurately state how much strength they require, thus you can't state what would be needed in order to be stronger, no? (these are, of course just 2/5 questions that you try to hold on to as "unanswerable", but then again, the others involve Surfer)
if you are asking what value would be considered larger than X, you need a reliable understanding of what X iselse, you can either argue about what X is, or say "X+1", that is, argue about Superman's indeterminate feats, or say "thor's greatest strength feat +1 pound". Given that these "greatest strength feats" are almost entirely subjective as in how much strength would actually be required, this option again just falls into arguing over the value of X needed for your question.
or, put as a simile, its like you are trying to fly a plane, yet you haven't assembled the pieces. The thing you want is contingent upon this other thing that is entirely nebulous at best...
make sense?
If that's the case, would you say it's impossible to prove that a character is stronger than Thor, if the aforementioned character is from a different universe altogether and there are no direct encounters, or indirect comparisons pertaining to other characters? Based on your stance, of course.
🙂
Originally posted by Black bolt zYes, you normally do.
I fail