Theoretical feats contest

Billy and Superman struggled to lift it.. and superman ASKED for help. Come on PR.. clearly those two things are mutually inclusive of one another via the writers intent.

Looking at the comic right now.

Aren't they only holding like 5 pages? Thats what is looks like.

Wow.

Well, this thread had potential but then devolved into a Superman feat deconstructing event. As far as that specific feat with Marvel goes, Superman's got way better, consistent, quantifiable, and less sketchy strength feats under his belt. I wouldn't hang on to that feat and use it as a selling point for strength for Kal.

As far as the thread's intent/question, probably a high end and high stakes "everything to lose" or amped Superman could do it.

Originally posted by JakeTheBank
Wow.

Well, this thread had potential but then devolved into a Superman feat deconstructing event.

Did you really not think that that would happen?

Originally posted by jalek moye
Did you really not think that that would happen?

I hoped it wouldn't, to be honest.

Originally posted by jalek moye
Did you really not think that that would happen?

Originally posted by Omega Vision
What, with all the intelligent posters in this forum?

Originally posted by Omega Vision
What, with all the intelligent posters in this forum?

Originally posted by Nihilist
Thats what happens as soon as Thor is mentioned in any thread.

Or Superman.

Or Thanos (this isn't an attack on you, btw, so don't take it the wrong way, please)

Or Silver Surfer.

They all have ardent supporters and have people lowball them to various degrees and people on the opposite side of the spectrum who use high feats only. That much I think we -should- all agree on.

Originally posted by JakeTheBank
Or Superman.

Or Thanos (this isn't an attack on you, btw, so don't take it the wrong way, please)

Or Silver Surfer.

They all have ardent supporters and have people lowball them to various degrees and people on the opposite side of the spectrum who use high feats only. That much I think we -should- all agree on.

NO-LIMITS FALLACY!!!

RABBLE!

Happens with pretty much any popular character here, or if not popular with a devoted fanbase

Originally posted by zopzop
It should be noted, that if Superman really did lift a book with infinite pages (and hence infinite mass) he's upper tier abstract level (Eternity/Infinity).

Point of no return.

Originally posted by JakeTheBank
Or Superman.

Or Thanos (this isn't an attack on you, btw, so don't take it the wrong way, please)

Or Silver Surfer.

They all have ardent supporters and have people lowball them to various degrees and people on the opposite side of the spectrum who use high feats only. That much I think we -should- all agree on.

Originally posted by Nihilist
No offense taken Jake, i completely agree, but the Thor fans have long had a problem with Superman being considered greater than him after Clark ko'd Thor.

👆

I don't really have an issue with it at all, to be frank. I like Thor more than Superman, but given that:

A.) It was a crossover and treated as non-canon for the purposes of the board (at least last time I checked)

B.) It was a good fight with Clark conceding Thor's about the toughest guy he's ever faced.

C.) Losing to Superman isn't some bad showing that some pretend it is.

D.) Thor generally has epic second winds/re-matches anyway.

I'm cool with it going down as it did. I don't think that fight should be the "be all/end all" of how they would fight and come out 10/10 times, but that's just me. They've both defeated people far more powerful than the other anyway. *shrug*

Originally posted by Rage.Of.Olympus
There is no quantifiable feat that a character can do that would place them above Thor strength wise in of itself.

Originally posted by psycho gundam
a mod should have closed the thread after this, cause that's the answer he's looking for

everyone quote it and have a nice day

Originally posted by Newjak
This thread is obviously a massive bait thread for sure.

So that is my reply to this obvious thread designed to try to enforce one person's biased perceptive need to make their own favorite such and such power character appear that much better than another high end ridiculously overpowered character or because they dislike such and such character to the point they want to downplay such and such character as much as possible.

Originally posted by OneDumbG0
No feats necessary. All you have to apparently do is:

a). be Superman
b). be Superman
c). be Superman
d). be Superman
e). be Superman

Superman is one of, like two characters who gets lowballed after all. ermmhappy

---

7 pages in, and people are ignoring the topic and instead choose to discuss Superman lifting the book for pages on end. Really now?

deconstructing the questions = trolling

also, this bickering over the indeterminate power levels you are questioning was the exact thing I and newjak (and others) predicted, given the bait questions you asked.

you really can't complain when people participate in the thread you make

How are you deconstructing the question?

showing that the underlying qualities in the questions are, themselves, so contentious that your questions essentially become either a debate about those qualities (bickering about superman), or are just straight out invalid/self evident.

Expand on why.

Originally posted by Philosophía
No, what I'm looking for goes beyond Superman, but nice to see the butthurt crew is in full force:

i thought you were trying to make a point about superman again without actually having to state it; the posters in the thread would do it, namely the ones who usually oppose those same arguments in other threads giving you the opportunity to say "told you so" and they all say:

and then you lol