Originally posted by lil bitchinesssomeone had to notice to run tests obviously
How exactly did we find this out? Did it just randomly dawn on someone 600 years ago?
We didn't know it before we measured it, and if we did know it before we measured it, why the hell did we know it when we had no proof?
Originally posted by StyleTime
Person 1: Prove God.Person 2: I can't. I still believe in him
Person 1: That's cool. I don't.
Person 2: You still playing Tekken 6 tonight?
Person 1: Hells yeah! See you at 8:00.
Really guys, all this debate about something that is so simple?
I am more in it for the debating than the outcome. I am debating in favor of the religious, even though I am more atheist than those two ever will be. That should say something about my presence here 😉
Originally posted by RE: Blaxican
I love how you guys have been repeating what I said like two pages ago. uhuhAll the females in this thread owe me a kiss.
No, you owe me!
Originally posted by 0mega Spawn
someone had to notice to run tests obviously
So run some tests on religion yourself, since you seem to have noticed something no one else has.
Originally posted by 0mega Spawn
don't try to worm your way out... lack of evidence cant point to the existence you clown
I did not worm out. You are the one that did not answer MY question. I answered yours. It can also not point to the non-existence of God.
Allow me to demonstrate with an example you might understand:
Is this pencil green or yellow?
Originally posted by 0mega Spawn
LOL you believe less in god than me not believing in god 😬 LOL you troll
You can not even present legitimate reasons for not believing in God. You are an embarassment to proud atheists. I do not believe less in God, I am more atheist.
It is not, though. You could not prove the atom existed a thousand years ago. Today, you know that we would not exist without it.
"Anti-God Matter" is not the same thing as "proof that God does not exist".
Again you avoided answering my question. Now you instead resorted into "I believe this. It doesn't matter what anyone else says".
Weak.
Originally posted by 0mega Spawn
Is this pencil green or yellow? blue... & not comparable in the slightestproof of god : evidence
proof of no god : would consist of no evidence of his existence
& there is no evidence of god... and being asked to find evidence of something that isnt there is retardedsimple
You just answered that question in the same way as I answered your question. Neither of the options were true, so I made a third. Not "proof of non-existence" nor "proof of existence" is true, so the answer is "Neither", same as the answer to the pencil question is "Blue" when I presented the options "Green" and "Yellow"
You just do not know that he does not exist. That does not mean that he does not, nor does it mean that others has not found him.
The cavemen knew that the sun existed, that doesn't mean that they knew what purpose it served, nor could they prove it. They lacked the resources to do so. Not being able to prove something, is no reason to say it does not exist.
You are shaming good atheists out there. Stop now.
Originally posted by 0mega Spawn
no phucking evidence of him you retard you're blocked
That does not make you less wrong, nor does it make my truth go away. You can hide, you can run, but you're no less weak than you were seven pages ago.
Originally posted by StyleTimeit is simple isnt it but retards like to complicate things
Person 1: Prove God.Person 2: I can't. I still believe in him
Person 1: That's cool. I don't.
Person 2: You still playing Tekken 6 tonight?
Person 1: Hells yeah! See you at 8:00.
Really guys, all this debate about something that is so simple?
no evidence no god... gimme some evidence i'll gladly believe
Originally posted by Rogue Jedi
OK then, you for me to prove God's existence, right? I now ask you to DISPROVE his existence. Show me hard core definitive evidence that he does NOT exist.You can't. I can't. This is where faith comes into play. I have faith that God exists, that's all I need. There is literally no way to prove or disprove Gods existence.
That isn't how evidence works.
That's like saying "prove unicorns don't exist". Even if you checked under ever rock, nook, and cranny, you couldn't do it all at the same time etc.
The burdon of proof is on one's shoulders to prove that evidence DOES exist, not the other way around.
You can't prove a negative.
Originally posted by 0mega Spawn
it is simple isnt it but retards like to complicate thingsno evidence no god... gimme some evidence i'll gladly believe
Intellectually complicating things is actually suggesting that the individual is not a retard. I know you can not read this, but felt like saying it anyway.
Originally posted by jinzin
😐
You use the same methods to prove Julius Caesar as you shoot down during a discussion about God. There are writings and sculptures that prove Julius Caesar. Nothing more. There is the Bible and sculptures that prove God.