show me some evidence, evidence, and evidence

Originally posted by 0mega Spawn
😆 really i thought it was lack of belief 😆

You put faith in the power of science, you imbecile. You use science to present the premise that God might not be real. Learn what the words you use mean, before you use them. Dear God in Hell, is this all the counter-party can muster?

Originally posted by 0mega Spawn
are you thinking before you type? LOL

religious side: no proof of gods existence

atheist side: no proof he doesn't exist

no proof god doesn't exist + no proof gods exist = non existent

to a mentally sound person anyway

Originally posted by Sadako of Girth
This is true.

This is a blunt example of just how bad a job you are doing, being the opposition of God.

A thousand years ago, it was impossible to prove that atoms existed. Today, you can do it almost with the snap of a finger. Does this mean they did not exist back then?

To say that it can not be proven means that it does not exist, is the greatest, most stupid argument an atheist can ever bring to a table. It is one of the reasons I am almost ashamed to not believe in God. Because of fools like you who think it is a legitimate argument and believe it is actually a case.

Again. Calling believers of science! This is weak.

Originally posted by RE: Blaxican
I'm pretty sure asking a religious individual for proof of God's existence is hypocritical.

Originally posted by Rogue Jedi
No. A scenario I have witnessed many times over.

You really dont wanna start a conversation like that.

(IE the repeated scenarios shown by the religious....cause that'd just be embarrassing for you... and to be honest unlike you, I hate to generalise)

Originally posted by 0mega Spawn
how

For they claim to need no proof.

Originally posted by 0mega Spawn
how

Originally posted by 0mega Spawn
how

Originally posted by RE: Blaxican
Because no proof has ever been presented that would indicate that there is no God.

Originally posted by 0mega Spawn
how

Because you assume your understanding of the situation is greater, when you question their faith. You do not need to prove, to verify the truth in your position, but you expect them to do so.

Hypocritical. Pathetic. Weak.

I like that word. Weak.

You put faith in the power of science, you imbecile. You use science to present the premise that God might not be real. Learn what the words you use mean, before you use them. Dear God in Hell, is this all the counter-party can muster?

i put faith in science to premise that god isnt real[sigh] ...are you phucking retarded? i don't use science as a tool to say god doesn't exist i use the fact that theres no evidence you really must be slow.

counter argument? im asking for proof which i STILL haven't seen

Originally posted by Super Marie 64
[b]Because you assume your understanding of the situation is greater, when you question their faith. You do not need to prove, to verify the truth in your position, but you expect them to do so.

Hypocritical. Pathetic. Weak.

I like that word. Weak. [/B]

Because the truth is that most religious claims can be proved to be false, but strangely, that seems to be a one way dynamic, it seems.

I think the anger behind God even being questioned in some people is a huge denoter of the insecurity about their faith.
(No great shock:

Spoiler:
Even Mother Theresa was an atheist.

Sorry to hear that the truth hurts you so.

Originally posted by Sadako of Girth
Because the truth is that most religious claims can be proved to be false,

Care to extrapolate on that?

Originally posted by RE: Blaxican
Because no proof has ever been presented that would indicate that there is no God. Asking someone to provide proof for their side of the argument when you have no proof for your own is hypocritical.

if i were to prove god doesn't what proof would that consist proof of? anti god matter? 😆 not hypocritical at all

Originally posted by 0mega Spawn
WOW JUST WOW

i put faith in science to premise that god isnt real[sigh] ...are you phucking retarded? i don't use science as a tool to say god doesn't exist i use the fact that theres no evidence you really must be slow.

counter argument? im asking for proof which i STILL haven't seen

Originally posted by 0mega Spawn
i don't have proof god doesn't exist? besides the fact hes nowhere to be found huh? unless of course you found him?

if i were to prove god doesn't what proof would that consist proof of? anti god matter? 😆 not hypocritical at all

"Absence of proof is proof of absence" actually contradicts the Scientific method. So that's not science you're using, that's your own flawed logic.

c'mon sadako lets search for some anti god matter Jumpy

Originally posted by Sadako of Girth
Nope all it takes ia a rejection of the absurd claims made by religion. 🙂

LOL Blanket clinging... The core of religion.

Again with rejecting a case made, through weak questioning of position. Can't you bring anything useful to the table?

You can not prove Julius Caesar. Period.

You cling to a blanket right now. Your position of security. Science. Quit the hypocritic bullshit and start making a case for yourselves. You look like idiots, so I suggest you pick up the pace or you will continue doing so.

Originally posted by Sadako of Girth
Except I actually forwarded an argument, so you'd sound silly..

So did I, with you replying to me. See my point? I did not actually bring anything to the table with that reply of mine, yet there's a discussion going on right now, right here. You telling me you forwarded an argument.

You do not have to contribute anything (Which you haven't) in order to justly claim you forward something.

Originally posted by RE: Blaxican
"Absence of proof is proof of absence" actually contradicts the Scientific method. So that's not science you're using, that's your own flawed logic.

magic ninja man says hello

Whelp, I see that I'm not dealing with anyone of Digimark level intelligence here, so I'm out.

Also Atheism isnt on trial here.
Its just choosing not to believe fairy tales.

You faithful are all atheists.
You just believe in all other religions except your own....
Yet you attack those who are atheistic to your relgion. Hows THAT for hypocrisy and weakness?

Originally posted by 0mega Spawn
my flawed logic? religious buff telling me about flawed logic 😆 now thats comedy

magic ninja man says hello

Religion is not flawed logic. Learn the meaning of flawed and the meaning of logic before trying that stunt again.

Originally posted by Sadako of Girth
Also Atheism isnt on trial here.
Its just choosing not to believe fairy tales.

Classic way to avoid proving your case.

You can not prove Julius Caesar. Period.

you comparing god to caesar lol