A Magnaguard vs. Darth Nihilus (Sabers only)

Saber-only fight.

Who takes this, a Magnaguard or supposedly the most powerful Sith Lord evah?

Setting: Mos Eisley Cantina

Discuss.

Even if Nihilus isn't the strongest at sabers, he's still not going to be taken down by a single Magnaguard. Nihilus wins 10/10.

Make it more than one and there's a danger.

Hm.. interesting though. How about all 5 copies of IG-88?

Originally posted by Q99
Make it more than one and there's a danger.

I can't imagine Nihilus doing worse than her against them... 😕

Originally posted by Q99
Make it more than one and there's a danger.

Alright.
I change it to Ahsoka vs. Nihilus.
Sabers only.
Who wins?

Ahsoka.

yeah, all sabers only fights are going to go to known characters..

Nihilus easy.

I don't see how Nihilus would pose a threat with a lightsaber to a magnaguard?

If Nihilus was simply a dark side spirit before his death, how was he killed by the Exile and co.?

wasn't his spirit woven into his clothing? Which can be destroyed. (and how do you know he WAS killed by Exile and Co? he just ceased to be a threat to the galaxy, i believe that mask was still alive, was it not?

tj
wasn't his spirit woven into his clothing? Which can be destroyed. (and how do you know he WAS killed by Exile and Co? he just ceased to be a threat to the galaxy, i believe that mask was still alive, was it not?

The Ravager exploded, tho.

the death star exploding didn't kill Sidious's spirit. Luke could feel, it years later.

tj
the death star exploding didn't kill Sidious's spirit. Luke could feel, it years later.

Right, but if the spirit was contained in the armor and the armor was destroyed, wouldn't that destroy the spirit too? If it wouldn't, why place it within the armor at all?

Palpatine's spirit wasn't anchored to anything, unlike Nihilus or Ragnos or whomever.

I think Nihilus was still a physical being when KotOR II was released, and he was made in to a spirit some time afterward. Inconsistency in Star Wars. Never heard of that before...

Lucien
Never heard of that before...

The damn ambiguity of Canadian sarcasm!

We had to develop it to put up with you machismo, in-your-face 'Mericans.

Lucien
We had to develop it to put up with you machismo, in-your-face 'Mericans.

It's best that you did. It's the only reason we tolerate the existence of you French-lites.

Spoiler:
Once we expunge China, you'll be next.

I figured as much. Though the French thing is quite hurtful. Most of us up here are ashamed of our Separatist brethren. We're one more senatorial kidnapping away from a full-blown Clone Wars of our own. And we've been establishing good relations with New Zealanders just in case.

Originally posted by Zampanó
Let me give you an analogous situation.

Two soccer teams are facing off, let's say Manchester United and Galaxy. If I were to tell you that Manchester United has a terrific defense, say 27 average steals by the defense per game (this is where I reveal how little I know about sports) and that they have perfected a 1/3/0 defense, and that their offense has had only one offsides call this season and that they have a relatively good average of points scored vs. shots taken, [b]who would you say wins the match?

If your answer is anything other than "I don't know" then you're doing it wrong. The answer to an unknown match is "I don't know."

Unknowns don't automatically lose. [/B]