Originally posted by MooCowofJusticeTreasonous cur.
Awwwww, you've relapsed.I was really rootin' for you too.
Originally posted by TheAuraAngelHe didn't train himself to be inhumanly strong. He also was stronger than any real life person but Bo wasn't some genetic freak either. That's the point as Link didn't stand out he just had help along the way to show him what skills to learn and what gear to possess.
You think you can train yourself to be inhumanly strong? And no, he isn't a genetic freak. A reincarnated hero but not a freak. That doesn't make him not physically strong enough to toss people around like their pebbles.Ahh, but evidence vs no evidence will always end in victory for those who give evidence in my book. And there isn't factual data to support Kratos in game is there. I don't recall any anyway. And what's it matter if they're ignorant? [b]Prove them wrong.
In a debate, no one really gives a shit what you believe. All that matters is what you can prove. And you haven't really proven anything.
Yes, we don't know hard facts. But that doesn't mean educated guesses are out of the picture. It's an assumption, just like the one you've given. But there really isn't a secret to having super strength, unless enhanced with an item, which isn't the case here.
Size doesn't matter. And I disagree on that point. In OoT, I distinctly remember seeing an awesome cutscene about the creation of Hyrule, which is a nice enough feat for the goddesses. But yeah, not that anything Zeus does really matters. He can't be used in any threads and at best can only be used to make Kratos look strong.
If they can prove the MK fighters are incapable of hurting the Zelda team, you have no argument. None at all. The only thing you can do is prove they can OR find a flaw/contradiction in their arguments. You've really not done either.
Yeah, you can. But I can say that Link is portrayed as super strong just like you can say he isn't. Until one of us brings evidence to prove our side, it doesn't really matter.
Who did that again? That is actually a legitimately stupid argument.
Quan, if they didn't care if they were right, why would they post evidence and do the math that they do? [/B]
I have posted evidence but if someone debates vs. superman it isn't the job of the supporters of superman to prove he can fly. Ignorance isn't an excuse people shouldn't debate games they are ignorant of.
Kratos is portrayed as superhumanly strong and unlike Link is an exception the guy can kill gods who can solo armies and have done so in the game. Boom.
I have shown comparisons and listed reasons why Link isn't stronger than the other loz characters in the game.
The item is the only thing that makes the feat possible so if Link meets someone who weighs more than he needs to put on the boots to make up the difference which takes away his mobility. Either way he loses here in either approach.
If someone is carrying a mountain on their back size does matter. To suggest the guy isn't strong when he outweighs a mountain is ridiculous. We can't determine how strong Kratos is but his portrayal is consistent with he's the exception in the game not the norm like Link is.
They don't know enough about the mk fighters to even make an argument and boomerangs, plants, etc. all can hurt Link. To suggest missiles, lightning blasts, sledgehammers can't hurt Link is saying forget everything about the zelda game itself. Only a fool would claim mk fighters can take on modern day earth yet be unable to hurt Link. I don't even know how anyone could with a straight face utter something to silly and so ignorant. No offense but it's like talking to someone whose a child.
The math they do doesn't prove anything which backs up my point. They create a a guesstimation without any real evidence just to win a debate.
Link is stronger than a human but in his game he relies on skill because he isn't stronger than his peers. He's strong enough to get the job done as most heroes tend to be and this game hasn't made him the genetic exception just the hero of destiny.