Originally posted by Uriel005It's not so much "broken implications" as it is "stretched fabrications." These "broken implications," for the most part, have little to do with the comics and don't merit serious consideration.
CIS doesn't work like that for most character but characters like FLash and Zoom have some really broken implications.
Originally posted by Galan007I know you're picking that randomly as an example, but there's a lot of context to the "saved the omniverse" feat.
In some cases, you're right - ex. just because Superman saved the omniverse by vibrating one time, doesn't mean he'll ever do it again. However, I think as long as the 'points' made regarding speedsters are provable (and by "provable", I mean they can be substantiated by on panel showings), then there is no reason to doubt their validity....But I really couldn't tell you if the points made in this thread are valid or not, as I haven't read any pages aside from this one.
Proper substantiation should find confirmation within the comics, that much I agree. And if there is little to no affirmation within the comics present, that's an indication that liberties are being taken.