Originally posted by His Airness
It's fairly obvious you've been absent for a lot of Thor's continuity otherwise you'd place your fanboyisim behind you and realize Mjolnir or not, Wolverine has absolutely no chance against Thor. However I see this isn't going to happen.
Fanboy? Riiiiight, because why again?
Because I didn't know that Thor survived in the sun and because I think that Wolverine can beat him in this fight with these stipulations? OF COURSE! Thinking a character can win in a fight against another severly depowered character! 😱 The OBVIOUS sign of a fanboy. 🙄
As for the change of an opinion, yeah you're right.
It's not going to happen if the debate on Thor's side doesn't evolve past the point of "he's a god" or "he's way stronger", because those simply are not good enough reasons for him to win.
I'm not being a fanboy. I've not yet stated one unreasonable thing that would put me into the category of a fanboy.. I've been stating facts.
And while I readily admit I'm no Thor expert, I don't collect his comics habitually, I DO however think I've seen enough of him from team books, crossovers, guest appearances, and two handfuls of his own books to have a decent understanding of the character... However, I also realize that it's easy to miss loads about a character with such a rich history.. Which is WHY I've been repeatedly asking for proof on behalf of the Thor supporters.. So far that proof has not been given, so there's been no reason for me to change my opinion on the battle.
Originally posted by His Airness
Yet at the same time, during the pinnacle of Thor's continuity he's consistently shown capable of fighting Surfer, Gladiator, etc on fairly even ground. Do Wolverines reflexes stack up? No.
Gladiator didn't have the reflexes to deal with Cannon Ball, where Wolverine has. Gladiator couldn't use his reflexes to keep from getting completely bludgened by Hulk.. Wolverine has.
Surfer, a guy with a 2 in the fighting ability department has not been fast enough to react to the carnage symbiote. He's been humilated by Spiderman, Daredevil, Black Panther. He wasn't fast enough to even react to the first half of his fight with Rhino. He's had trouble dealing with Sleepwalker (This means next to nothing, but in an alternate reality Wolverine killed him, and held off Gladiator for 6 days).
Why the comparisons? Well look no further than below.
Originally posted by His Airness
Would you use the same logic when debating against Superman? In all fights, Superman doesn't use his speed although it's obvious from previous showings that he's faster than his opponent. The same can be said for Thor, especially since it's been established on panel that both consistently hold back in fights.
The ideal that one character is brought up while the other is brought down to make an ideal or entertaining fight being your copout, kind of makes the whole using Silver Surfer and Gladiator as your standard for Thor's reflexes a bit... shall we say hypocritical...
Thor fighting characters doesn't really display to me any valuable proof of his speed or reflexes.. Which is why I... NEED... FEATS.... Something where his speed or reflexes can either be clearly seen or read stated upon.
Originally posted by His Airness
Now your assuming Mjolnir provides Thor with enhanced reflexes? More unnecessary speculation.
😕
He's done it before.
Originally posted by His Airness
Never claimed Thor couldn't be cut, only that no fatal wounds would be inflicted upon him. The sun feat should support this as it would take extreme durability to withstand the trillion upon trillions of tons of ripping pressure the core produces.
It's a baseless claim. Wolverine has cut people and stabbed people who've proven better durability than Thor..
While he might be able to take the Sun, it's not the same as him taking a bullet or a knife or an admantium claw... Most of those other characters have better durability to a bullet than Thor as proven. I don't get what's so hard about that.
Sun's a nice feat, different durability.
Originally posted by His Airness
With the exception of Thanos, Thor is superior to all the characters you mentioned. The Thanos feat is PIS as is and holds no credibility on these forums.
PIS is totally and utterly subjective.
And that's the thing, as long as evidence exists, if you don't like it, you ignore it with a claim to PIS. I'll ask you as I've asked so many others, give me proof that discredits it. Show me where admantium blades have failed to cut Thanos.. Not energy, or black holes, or class 100 punches, but something comparible.
Originally posted by His Airness
So all the characters you mentioned are able to stand in the core of the sun, take shots from Zeus, take shots from Celestials, etc? 😐
Maybe not, but almost all of them are able to deflect bullets with their epidermis. 😬
Originally posted by His Airness
The sun feat, and the Viking feat aren't considered evidence? 😐
No one said that.
Originally posted by His Airness
You still haven't explained how Wolverine's going to keep Thor from punting him into orbit.... 😕
Umm yes I have, several times infact.