Thor (without Mjolnir) VS Wolverine

Originally posted by #1110
Wolverines claws could probably cut a locomotive. But what happens when Wolverine is standing on the train tracks and a Locomotive is speeding towards him at 100mph?

Thor could hit him that hard.

The difference in strength and durability is far too great for skill to be a factor. Its like a Kung Fu master trying to fight an Elephant.

It's not even remotely similar. The anatomy of an Asguardian is the same as a humans, only his muscles/bones are denser. Thor has heart, he has a brain, he has a jugular, has any number of places where he can be hit that will put him down instantly. Thor isn't a train.

I was thinking about this fight and reading other post that made sense by srankmissingnin plus a few others. Thor doesn't have a HF like the Hulk does and is slower in battle...Logan wins.

It's saying alot about old i can cut through anything in the universe when hulk can one-shot ares and she-hulk but it take's this much to put down wolverine.

I've kind got an impression that Thor has some kind of superspeed even when he doesn't have the hammer? True or false? Is it more like Surfer's or Superman's? (Ie. He can run at very high speeds, but his combat speed/attacking speed isn't THAT high.)

Originally posted by srankmissingnin
In Uncanny 138-140 (somewhere I round there), Wolverine's berserker rage is described as the equivalent of days worth of combat pushed into minutes. It amps all Wolverine's abilities to the nth degree.

...yeah and Sentry has the power of a million exploding suns.....

Originally posted by Soljer
Do you earnestly believe that, even an angry, Thor can match Wolverine for speed or skill?

Or do you think that Thor would be impervious to Logan's claws?

I will say this though when push comes to shove sometimes he can really move. Moongoose a speedster was beating the crap out of Thor but Thor then used speed to get rid of him

Originally posted by Alfheim
...yeah and Sentry has the power of a million exploding suns.....

Originally posted by Battlehammer
differences is this is stated as fact in the text and then shown.

Examples? 😐

this is ridiculous.

It is highly controversial whether Superman can beat Thor yet people think Wolverine can beat Thor?

I dont care if berserker amps Wolverine 100x, he still shouldn't be a problem for Thor.

Thor would resort to lightning to fry Logan.

Originally posted by Alfheim
Examples? 😐

fight with wendigo. clearly states that and Logan then shows it, by putting wendigo down for the count.

Originally posted by Master-Borg
this is ridiculous.

It is highly controversial whether Superman can beat Thor yet people think Wolverine can beat Thor?

I dont care if berserker amps Wolverine 100x, he still shouldn't be a problem for Thor.

Thor would resort to lightning to fry Logan.

read the dam stipulation before talking.

Originally posted by Master-Borg

Thor would resort to lightning to fry Logan.

This is the thing.....I just dont want to be a Wolverine hater. Thor should be fast enough to hit Wolverine with lightning several times and is good enough to stop himself from being stabbed straight away....I dunno man...think im going to change my mind.....

If there was no lightning Wolverine would defintely win.

Originally posted by Battlehammer
fight with wendigo. clearly states that and Logan then shows it, by putting wendigo down for the count.

...thats not his first appearnce is it? At any rate obvoulsy if somebody goes beserk they can be more dangerous....but that still doesnt mean its equal to a days combat. Cant see any difference between that and werewolf Wolverine.

Originally posted by Battlehammer
read the dam stipulation before talking.

Originally posted by Alfheim
...thats not his first appearnce is it?

Originally posted by Battlehammer
nope

I edited my post.

Originally posted by Master-Borg
the stipulation says he can use lightning

lol I guesses the threads were merged or the stipulations were changed later any ways.

the debate is this.

Were going by if thor had no hammer and could only go melee.

if thor had his hammer there be no debate.

Originally posted by Battlehammer
lol I guesses the threads were merged or the stipulations were changed later any ways.

the debate is this.

Were going by if thor had no hammer and could only go melee.

if thor had his hammer there be no debate.

but Thor can still use lightning without the hammer I believe (not 100% sure)

Originally posted by Alfheim
...thats not his first appearnce is it? At any rate obvoulsy if somebody goes beserk they can be more dangerous....but that still doesnt mean its equal to a days combat. Cant see any difference between that and werewolf Wolverine.

well if it states it equal to a day of combat in the text.........there really no debating it. Since it was not word of mouth of Logan, but straight from the writer.

difference with werewolf wolverine. was the fact capt said it not the text.
Logan ahd the mind of a werewolf which means he could no be berserker since he need his own mind to do so. Capt never seen berserker wolverine he simply heard about it. Capt was guessing with no prior knolwedge and did not know Logan had the mind of a werewolf. It completely different

Originally posted by Master-Borg
the thread states NO HAMMER

but Thor can still use lightning without the hammer I believe (not 100% sure)

He can't to my knowledge and ever one else is debating this as melee combat.

Originally posted by Battlehammer
He can't to my knowledge and ever one else is debating this as melee combat.

I just dont get how people think Thor can handle Superman's speed but can't handle Logan's speed