Originally posted by Dr McBeefington
Uh, based on what evidence exactly?
Evil Never dies. the Sith King's betrayers gave the holocron to the new Dark Lord as a gift and it was passed down until it was lost in the Great Hyperspace War
Good job LS, you provided a quote. Now we know either Vader or Palpatine had it. Do we know if they studied it or are we just going to assume one of them did?
You are aware that Palpatine was, again, the one behind the Mecrosa order? They answered to him? Palpatine is described as strictly controlling Vader's access to Sith holocrons, by the way.
And if Palpatine had it, he didn't study it? Seriously? Mr. "Knowledge is everything?"
IF you have a holocron, you don't keep it as a paperweight
Nothing is clearing stating that he mastered it LS. Being the gatekeeper doesn't require mastery of the holocron but a certain level of skill or successful initiation by the previous gatekeeper. Stop reaching.
Of the greatest Sith Holocron out there? For starters, unless it judges you worthy, you can't access it. Becoming the representation of the knowledge is a different thing/.
Not only that, but Palpatine is the one describing everything in the Holocron, and indicates he has much, much more in store
Yes, I get it. Your last gasp quote that has been called hyperbole since your disappearance from this forum. This one isn't going to get you out of the jam that you're in.Strawman x5. Is this what you do when you get overwhelmingly defensive? Come up with a bunk conclusion from the other party and attempt to challenge it?
Uh, what strawman? That's not a strawman.
Where?
In Jedi vs. Sith. He says all the knowledge was imparted to Nadd and Kun as a result of Sadow's generosity, and they freely shared all they knew as well. He says since neither ended well, he'll keep the majority of Sadow's knowledge to himself
Because you come back years later with the same petty, tiresome, debunked arguments (symbolized by your Palpatine DE quote). If you at least attempted to hide your rampant PT fanboyism, others would engage you in debate more often. Otherwise, you're a lost cause.
I'm sorry, direct canonical quotes are somehow not valid when they don't support you?