BT Thor vs Lord Marvell

Started by quanchi1125 pages

Originally posted by Rage.Of.Olympus
Yes they do. Making baseless claims doesn't mean they don't count. Claiming Thor was never a threat and couldn't hurt Odin/Surtur is a blatant lie. Thor also never prayed while fighting Glory -he couldn't- and took him on solo. For the record, Glory was compared to Zeus taking all of the Olympians and becoming one in regards to power.

Surfer made the statement while Thor effortlessly shattered a cosmic barrier.

I'm not going to waste any more time here. Once again, if you want to continue this discussion I'll battle zone you.

That's no argument and I don' care.

If you attempt to ignore Thor being injured, I'll ignore Thanos being weakened. Which makes the showing valid for Thanos vs. threads. Stay consistent.

So what? That doesn't detract from the irony.

I understand that it's not standard gear but you claimed it obviously helped him against Surfer. I want to know why you'd even make such a claim as the only think those suits do is provide flight and protection from space which is something Thor showed to posses by his lonesome.

Don't make baseless claims.

What question do you want me to answer? I must have missed it.

Mar-Vell isn't superior to Thor. At least not this Thor.

Skill and sufficient power could put Thor down. At least at that point but by the time he was wrecking the Infinity Watch, no one short of Thanos had a chance to put him down straight up. No, not even Bill. Herald level attacks just seemed to be annoyances at that point.

Whatever you say. Concession accepted.

Thor was never ever a threat in bringing Odin or Surtur down under his own power. It's not a lie. Thor's also fled from his dear old dad before.

Hyperbole aside Glory was all lip service. Glory can't beat Zeus nor has he. You have to put up or shut up I tire of your exaggerations.

What does it matter anyways since Thor's strength didn't put the Surfer down despite him really going balls to the walls against the Surfer who tried reasoning with him.

Ok, so you agree Surfer is more formidable. We are finally getting somewhere.

Thor had a battle suit on while Thanos was defeated via plot device similar to Iron Man's satellites outside Drax's own power.

So if you admit it aided Thor's flight in space you admit it aids Thor. According to this writer Thor needs it to battle the Surfer in space. I am glad you are agreeing with me. I'm proud of you.

How isn't he superior to a Thor who was down and acting crazy to Beta Ray Bill. Give me anything to suggest BrB can do the same to Mar-vell.

Thor had the power gem against the watch hence the reason he was winning but he doesn't have the power gem here. Context.

When you abandon this thread you concede. I don't start screaming battlezone in threads demanding they cease arguing. Put up or remain silent.

Originally posted by quanchi112
Thor was never ever a threat in bringing Odin or Surtur down under his own power. It's not a lie. Thor's also fled from his dear old dad before.

That's not what you said Quan. You claimed he was never a threat and has never been capable of causing them harm. Which is an outright lie.

Originally posted by quanchi112
Hyperbole aside Glory was all lip service. Glory can't beat Zeus nor has he. You have to put up or shut up I tire of your exaggerations.

It doesn't matter what you think. Glory was intended to be a Skyfather plus being and was Glory's most powerful lieutenant.

Nothing I posted is an exaggeration.

What does it matter anyways since Thor's strength didn't put the Surfer down despite him really going balls to the walls against the Surfer who tried reasoning with him.

Originally posted by quanchi112
Ok, so you agree Surfer is more formidable. We are finally getting somewhere.

I never said anything of the sort.

Originally posted by quanchi112
Thor had a battle suit on while Thanos was defeated via plot device similar to Iron Man's satellites outside Drax's own power.

So if you admit it aided Thor's flight in space you admit it aids Thor. According to this writer Thor needs it to battle the Surfer in space. I am glad you are agreeing with me. I'm proud of you.

There's not even any indication the armor made him faster than before. At best it let Thor exert less energy in some venues as flying -not that it was tiring before- but it's no comparison to Thor's injury.

Originally posted by quanchi112
How isn't he superior to a Thor who was down and acting crazy to Beta Ray Bill. Give me anything to suggest BrB can do the same to Mar-vell.

Why would he be? Mar-Vell can wreck Heralds but so could Thor. That's the best point you've made so far but unfortunately I think Thor had reached a point where Herald level attacks were simply incapable of putting him down after he got up.

For the record, we never saw Mar-Vell's durability tested. He got knocked down by Thanos but doesn't tell us much except he's not as tough as Thanos.

Originally posted by quanchi112
Thor had the power gem against the watch hence the reason he was winning but he doesn't have the power gem here. Context.

Not that fight.

Originally posted by quanchi112
When you abandon this thread you concede. I don't start screaming battlezone in threads demanding they cease arguing. Put up or remain silent.

I don't stop debating with you nowadays because I concede, I stop debating with you because I tire of your shtick.

In a battle zone you won't have an unlimited number of posts where you can just drag shit out for no real reason.

I'm pretty much bored at this point. You want to debate this further, PM and I'll battle zone you. Debating for large lengths of time has never been a problem for me, keeping interest has been.

And watching you squirm as I systematically destroy you would be interesting.

"Is Blood and Thunder Thor's highest showing?", " How powerful was Surfer in comparison to Thor in their first battle?" etc. are all topics I'd love to do.

Originally posted by Rage.Of.Olympus
That's not what you said Quan. You claimed he was never a threat and has never been capable of causing them harm. Which is an outright lie.

It doesn't matter what you think. Glory was intended to be a Skyfather plus being and was Glory's most powerful lieutenant.

Nothing I posted is an exaggeration.

What does it matter anyways since Thor's strength didn't put the Surfer down despite him really going balls to the walls against the Surfer who tried reasoning with him.

I never said anything of the sort.

There's not even any indication the armor made him faster than before. At best it let Thor exert less energy in some venues as flying -not that it was tiring before- but it's no comparison to Thor's injury.

Why would he be? Mar-Vell can wreck Heralds but so could Thor. That's the best point you've made so far but unfortunately I think Thor had reached a point where Herald level attacks were simply incapable of putting him down after he got up.

For the record, we never saw Mar-Vell's durability tested. He got knocked down by Thanos but doesn't tell us much except he's not as tough as Thanos.

Not that fight.

I don't stop debating with you nowadays because I concede, I stop debating with you because I tire of your shtick.

In a battle zone you won't have an unlimited number of posts where you can just drag shit out for no real reason.

I'm pretty much bored at this point. You want to debate this further, PM and I'll battle zone you. Debating for large lengths of time has never been a problem for me, keeping interest has been.

And watching you squirm as I systematically destroy you would be interesting.

"Is Blood and Thunder Thor's highest showing?", " How powerful was Surfer in comparison to Thor in their first battle?" etc. are all topics I'd love to do.

A threat is someone who can best you that's what I meant. Thor can never beat either and isn't a true threat to either.

Glory doesn't have the showings to prove anything other than a villain whose sole purpose is to lose to Thor. That's it.

Thor's strength can't beat the Surfer so it's irrelevant to Mar-vell especially if it hasn't shown the ability to down the new surfer.

So you just flip flopped. You said no argument there and now want to take it back.

You admit it aided Thor so you agree. It balances everything else out and the fact Surfer was trying to reason with Thor most of the time.

Thor can also be beaten by heralds unlike Mar-vell. That's the entire point. Mar-vell was never tested by anyone save Thanos because everyone else he went up against was nothing to him unlike Thor who got drummed by BrB.

The other fight wasn't impressive.

I told you I don't have the time nor the desire to battlezone every petty disagreement here and there. Just don't respond so you can begin the healing process.