Sauron vs Snape

Yeah, I always thought it would have fit well for the movies. In the books it really wouldn't make sense but the movies seemed to be building up to it. Plus it would have looked awesome! 😄

I think Gollum made for a better final boss.

Maybe, could have been a bit... Sosuke Aizen though.

Gollum? Pff the Mouth of Sauron was teh boss.

"Ahhh Old greybeard. I have a token I was bidden to show thee. The halfling was dear to thee, I see. Know that he suffered greatly at the hands of his host. Who would've thought one so small could endure so much pain? And he did, Gandalf, he did. "

"And who is this? Isildur's heir? It takes more to make a King that a broken Elvish blade"

Gollum worked in the sense that he was the Ring's greatest victory. That and the fact there's no way Sauron was going down a second time. 😖hifty:

The very notion that a spell won't work on a ****ing Wand is absurd, if Ron's fat ass could break it, the spell that heated Aragorn's sword certainly could.

Originally posted by EvilAngel
Maybe, could have been a bit... Sosuke Aizen though.

Gollum? Pff the Mouth of Sauron was teh boss.

"Ahhh Old greybeard. I have a token I was bidden to show thee. The halfling was dear to thee, I see. Know that he suffered greatly at the hands of his host. Who would've thought one so small could endure so much pain? And he did, Gandalf, he did. "

"And who is this? Isildur's heir? It takes more to make a King that a broken Elvish blade"

*Proceeds to get head lopped off like a punk*

uhuh

Originally posted by NemeBro
The very notion that a spell won't work on a ****ing Wand is absurd, if Ron's fat ass could break it, the spell that heated Aragorn's sword certainly could.

Considering it's a magical wand and magic spells are often designed to do only certain things, it's not absurd.

What's absurd is the no limit fallacies thinking such as: "With King exploded Gandalf's staff, ergo the Witch King can explode anything."

Originally posted by Robtard
Considering it's a magical wand and magic spells are often designed to do only certain things, it's not absurd.

What's absurd is the no limit fallacies thinking such as: "With King exploded Gandalf's staff, ergo the Witch King can explode anything."

I don't see any diffrence between blowing up a magic staff and blowing up a magic wand except for the amount of material being blown up.

Originally posted by Robtard
Considering it's a magical wand and magic spells are often designed to do only certain things, it's not absurd.

What's absurd is the no limit fallacies thinking such as: "With King exploded Gandalf's staff, ergo the Witch King can explode anything."

So logically, if the Witch King could destroy a Wizard's wand if he was magically more powerful.

Whether that is or is not the case is arguable.

^ exactly. It harkens back to what Gandalf did to Saruman. It shows magical superiority.

So it breaks down to Witch King exploded Gandalf's staff; Gandalf made Aragorn's sword heat up therefore Sauron explodes and/or burns Snape's wand. Clearly, that makes perfect sense.

Also, Sauron can shoot fireballs from his mouth and lightning bolts from his ass. Why? Cos I said so and he's powerful, so it fits. Prove he can't, I dare you.

The ability to break the staff of a Wizard directly depends on you having greater magic than he does.

The notion that the Witch King possesses powers that Sauron, who gave him his power, does not, is absurd.

Originally posted by NemeBro
The notion that the Witch King possesses powers that Sauron, who gave him his power, does not, is absurd.

👆

This forum is full of bizarre leaps of logic. Yoda can telekinetically grip metal but not human flesh?

Originally posted by Turr_Phennir
This forum is full of bizarre leaps of logic. Yoda can telekinetically grip metal but not human flesh?

Movie feats only.

Lol.

What?

He can certainly grip human flesh.

Not that Sauron has any. He's more like a droid.

Edit: Wait why are we talking about Yoda?

Why wouldn't we be talking about Yoda? 😐

Originally posted by NemeBro
The ability to break the staff of a Wizard directly depends on you having greater magic than he does.

The notion that the Witch King possesses powers that Sauron, who gave him his power, does not, is absurd.

Probably.

No, not really. A lacky having an ability a master hasn't isn't beyond reason.

Not if your power literally comes from them.

Originally posted by Turr_Phennir
This forum is full of bizarre leaps of logic. Yoda can telekinetically grip metal but not human flesh?